Subj : Something new...
To : Richard Webb
From : mark lewis
Date : Wed Oct 14 2009 07:08 pm
RW> Much the same with binkley, the task number config parameter is
RW> important here I"m sure. ONly worked with one multinode
RW> setup and that was many moons ago. But, iirc. that's what
RW> we did was a config for each node. NOw mind you all three
RW> were pots.
shouldn't really matter as long as each node can be config'd specially for the
needs of that node...
RW> AS for routing, squish or his mail processor would handle
RW> that as Bink is a static mailer. SAme inbound/outbound dirs though
RW> pointed to by all versions.
hummm... therein lays the problem... can tossers handle multiple routings for
static mail bundles?? FD can because it is dynamic in building its outbound
stuffs but if a BSO style tosser cannot build multiple ?lo files indicating
different "status'" for the same static outbound bundles for separate nodes,
this may be a problem...
RW> Back in the day there was lots of help in this echo for
RW> getting multinode setups humming along nicely, especially
RW> with os2, so anybody who's got this echo archived way back
RW> could probably be quite a resource if you still have
RW> trouble.
agreed... sadly, though, my archiving is more like a "live feed" in that my set
up simply retains postings for a much longer time than others... currently
that's only one year :?
