Subj : Kermit
To   : Sean Dennis
From : Andy Ball
Date : Wed Oct 27 2004 02:08 am

2004-10-18

Hello Sean,

 SD> If that's the case, then why doesn't someone use the non-ACK
   > mode for telnet connections?  Every terminal program I've used
   > seems to use that, even those that are designed for telnet
   > (including ZOC, QModem Pro, HT)... doesn't make sense.

It's a while since I looked at the innards.  Doesn't Telnet work on the
assumption that TCP ensures a reliable connection, discarding broken datagrams
and acknowleging good ones?  Perhaps it does some of its own error checking
just in case someone decides to run it over UDP though.  Rather than speculate
I should check the source, which I don't have access to until I get home.

 SD> I was experimenting with Kermit when I was running Maximus/2 and
   > it seemed to have the uncanny ability to run wide open with
   > unlimited packet size.

Sounds like their "sliding window" feature: it can send a number of packets
without waiting for an ACK for each one (obviously it expects to receive the
ACKs eventually).  I hear that (among other talents) Kermit is great for high
latency links such as transfers to or from satellites.

- Andy Ball

* SLMR 2.1a *
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
# Origin: FamilyNet Sponsored by http://www.christian-wellness.net (8:8/2)
* Origin: BBS Networks @ www.bbsnets.com 808-839-6036 (1:10/345)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.