Subj : Re: Synchronet vs. Mystic
To : James Coyle
From : Jas Hud
Date : Wed May 04 2022 10:35 pm
|03Quoting message from |11James Coyle |03to |11Dan Clough
|03on |1104 May 22 10:28:14|03.
JC> DC> Mystic seems to be more preferred by the "scene" folks, for reasons t
JC> DC> escape me. I think SBBS appeals more to the "tinkerer" types. Also
JC>
JC> Mystic has been historically quite a bit more advanced in the way it handl
JC> ANSI and its user interface. While Synchronet has added these things in
JC> recent day/years, these features were often found in Mystic for decades be
JC> (which is enough time to build a following).
you arent trying to say mystic is better and more advanced than synchronet,
are you? because you might be retarded if you think that.
mystic is just a renegade knock off because the guys that took over from cott
lang told you to fuck off.
JC> And of course there is just preference. Some people prefer Pascal and Pyth
JC> over JavaScript and C++. Some people grew up using Renegade/Telegard and l
JC> Mystic for its similarities. Some people like Mystic's security. Some pe
JC> may choose Sychronet for all of those opposite reasons (they used Synchron
JC> in the 1990s, they want to write JavaScript, etc).
i'm a renegade and telegard guy and i cant stand mystic.
i'd rather run elebbs or anything else.
and i dont know of any current bbses users who ran synchronet in the 90s.
your examples are very poor.
... If you were an Armadillo, you'd worship trees, too!
