Subj : Re: No routing of point addresses.
To : Alan Ianson
From : Marc Lewis
Date : Wed Oct 28 2020 08:49 pm
Hello Alan.
<On 27Oct2020 17:34 Alan Ianson (1:153/757.2) wrote a message to Marc Lewis regarding No routing of point addresses. >
> I have had to change my netmail routing to another node that doesn't
> exhibit this aberrant behaviour.
AI> I haven't looked at the input .pkt so here is my guess.
> Any views on this?
AI> Was the packet addressed to 1:261/38? The packet header I mean. The
AI> messages within the packet could have been echomail or netmail
AI> addressed to any node and those message will be forwarded on as
AI> usual.
The mail bundle was addressed to 261/38 for forwarding purposes. The packet
would have been addressed to 2:333/808.7. In yet another case the mail bundle was again addressed to 1:261/38 and the packet would have been addressed to 2:221/360. Those two were never delivered until I resent them to a different node with international connections and a different tosser. Those were promptly delivered to their destinations by whatever group of intervening nodes.
[snip]
AI> If that packet was addressed to 1:261/38 (the packet, not the
AI> messages inside) the tosser there will likely act on it as needed.
If by packet you actually mean the mail bundle, then yes the affected bundles went to 1:261/38.
