Subj : No routing of point addresses.
To   : Marc Lewis
From : Alan Ianson
Date : Tue Oct 27 2020 05:34 pm

> I have had to change my netmail routing to another node that doesn't exhibit
> this aberrant behaviour.

I haven't looked at the input .pkt so here is my guess.

> Any views on this?

Was the packet addressed to 1:261/38? The packet header I mean. The messages within the packet could have been echomail or netmail addressed to any node and those message will be forwarded on as usual.

Some tossers will toss any old packet you send there but most look for packets addressed to itself (1:261/38 in this case) and will then do what it needs to do with those messages. Some tossers can/will pass on packets as they are to another node if it is so addressed but that usually requires an agreement and extra configuration.

If that packet was addressed to 1:261/38 (the packet, not the messages inside) the tosser there will likely act on it as needed.

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-4
* Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.