Subj : Re: Robbing the Poor to Pay the Rich
To : Gregory Deyss
From : Jeff Thiele
Date : Sat Oct 08 2022 12:27 pm
On 08 Oct 2022, Gregory Deyss said the following...
GD> JT> I know because of my job, and I know that you are trying very hard to
GD> JT> insert two logical fallacies in this conversation:
GD> Wait a minute, A logical fallacy is an argument that can be disproven
GD> through reasoning. This is different from a subjective argument or one
GD> that can be disproven with facts; for a position to be a logical
GD> fallacy, it must be logically flawed or deceptive in some way.
As indeed were the two arguments that I pointed out.
GD> It was not my intention to be flawed or deceptive in anyway.
GD> You could of made your point without the sarcasm when you asked me if I
GD> was sleeping? I simply pointed out that Obama largely effected Welfare
GD> reduction act of 1996.
I could have, but where's the fun in that? Obama didn't affect welfare work
requirements to nearly the degree that you're suggesting he did, if at all.
GD> In fact I am glad that you have a job where you can help people and make
GD> a positive difference. In that regard, we are very similar.
