Subj : Re: Pence-Harris Debate
To : IB Joe
From : Alan Ianson
Date : Sun Oct 11 2020 05:27 am
>> Barrett's view of abortion is not impartial. That could affect her
>> ability to interpret law.
> Can you show me where she has ruled in favor of her personal feelings and not
> followed the constitution...??
I know she signed an add that called Roe v Wade barbaric. The add was anti Roe v. Wade.
>> The supreme court does not govern in any way. It interprets law and
>> renders judgements, hopefully in an impartial way.
> There is no constitutional amendment giving a woman the right to have an
> abortion.
Do you want one?
> Some left-wing activist sitting on the supreme court in the 70's made it
> happen. The left know this and are worried that it may get over turned
> someday because the decision was not founded on solid constitutional
> grounding.
It was the supreme court that made that well respected ruling with 7-2 decision. No left-wing activists in that case.
If ya'll wanna go back to the abortion thing have at it, I'll watch.
The constitution doesn't care about abortion.
> Federal government should stay out of things, most things.
True enough. That law keeps it out of states hands too and they may like it that way.
> Let the states and their citizens make their way through things... Let the
> citizens of that state hold their elected officials accountable.
OK, if the states want it give it to them.
> Large and intrusive federal government sucks...
Yep, laws and laws and laws suck too.
I'm not sure what will suck more, I suspect if Roe v. Wade was overturned it would suck more but there is only one way to find out.
--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-4
* Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)
