Subj : Re: Pandemic
To : Gregory Deyss
From : mark lewis
Date : Mon Apr 06 2020 11:38 pm
Re: Re: Pandemic
By: Gregory Deyss to Dan Cross on Mon Apr 06 2020 19:23:14
GD> the Robert Mueller Investigation? Which produced a conclusion of No
Collusion
GD> & No Obstruction.
this is wrong and you've been told it is wrong ever since you started spouting
it... you are leaving out parts of it... very important parts...
https://www.politico.eu/article/mueller-refutes-trumps-no-collusion-no-obstruction-line/
[quote]
Former special counsel Robert Mueller pushed back against U.S. President Donald
Trump's characterizations of his 22-month investigation, telling lawmakers on
Wednesday that he did not evaluate 'collusion' with the Russian government, and
confirming that his report did not conclude that there was 'no obstruction' of
the probe.
[/quote]
HINT 1: did not evaluate 'collusion' with the Russian government
HINT 2: did not conclude that there was 'no obstruction' of the probe.
the above does NOT say there was no collusion at all... it says they didnt
evaluate it with respect to the russian government... quite the opposite of
what you're trying to say it says...
it also speaks only of the mueller probe in reference to "did not conclude 'no
obstruction'"... and if you know anything, you know you can take the two
negatives out and it says "did conclude 'obstruction'" meaning that there was
obstruction going on of the probe... this, again, is the exact opposite of what
you're trying to say it says...
either way, the report also *did not* say there was absolutely no collusion of
any kind and no obstruction of any kind... if you believe that, then you cannot
read what is written in plain english...
)\/(ark
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
* Origin: SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR (1:3634/12)
