Subj : Re: Quid Pro Quo - Joe
To : GREGORY DEYSS
From : TIM RICHARDSON
Date : Mon Jan 06 2020 02:21 am
On 01-03-20, DALE SHIPP said to GREGORY DEYSS:
-=> On 01-02-20 19:03, Gregory Deyss <=-
-=> spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Quid Pro Quo - Joe <=-
GD> Does that jog your memory? In addition did you watch the
GD> hearings that Adam was
GD> the chair in, he would not let the republicans a word in edge wise.
DS>Every member got their five minutes. If Schiff cut someone off it was
DS>because of their being out of time, or because they were attempting to
DS>violate established procedures, e.g. attempting to expose the
DS>whistleblower's identity in public. The Republicans had just as much
DS>time each as any of the Democrats had.
The republicans were denied their right to call witnesses.
The whole country saw that (and so did Shipp).
Schitt cut off every instance in which he thought a republican was going to
mention `the whistleblower'.
After pumping up the nation on the whistleblower being able to bring Trump
down....suddenly Schitt did everything he could to supress even the very
mention of the whistleblower!
Why?
Because it came out that this so-called `whistleblower' had ginned up his
story with Schitt's own aides! And who knows' what would have come out under
cross-examination!
This is a piss poor job of railroading. And its most likely to fail. Pelosi
can't deliver the articles of impeachment to the Senate. Because that means a
`trial'. In which Trump gets to call witnesses. Hello....whistleblower!
---
*Durango b301 #PE*
* Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)
