Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
_______ __ _______
| | |.---.-..----.| |--..-----..----. | | |.-----..--.--.--..-----.
| || _ || __|| < | -__|| _| | || -__|| | | ||__ --|
|___|___||___._||____||__|__||_____||__| |__|____||_____||________||_____|
on Gopher (inofficial)
Visit Hacker News on the Web
COMMENT PAGE FOR:
People returned to live in Pompeii's ruins, archaeologists say
ggm wrote 1 day ago:
Volcanic ash is highly productive and at the very least you would think
latifundia would be there. If opportunistically you can find an old
water cistern and turn it into an oven, why not?
Modern day Indonesian and Philippines and Pac rim Island farmers don't
stay away from volcanoes any longer than they have to. Mud flows
different. Ash? That's plantable. And tuff forms, you can build with
it.
Intralexical wrote 19 hours 30 min ago:
I find this surprising, because my impression was that complex
biology requires pioneer species to spend some time making "fresh"
geology from the earth inhabitable first if there isn't already an
established ecosystem.
Why is volcanic ash so productive? Is it the result of coincidence?
Adaptation? Some resource cycle?
ggm wrote 3 hours 37 min ago:
Bio available trace elements and loose structure. Stuff you find in
fertiliser is typically rich in volcanic ash. And lack of
competition because its virgin soil. The coloniser species are what
happens without human intervention.
rg2004 wrote 1 day ago:
How would anyone be able to afford anything if all their possessions
were under hardened magma
downrightmike wrote 1 day ago:
Romans were known to take poor people and make them slaves, that's
one solution
lostlogin wrote 1 day ago:
It wasn’t magma, it was 4-6m of ash and pumice.
[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pompeii
cloudbonsai wrote 1 day ago:
I think I found the source paper (written in Itallian): [1] So the
archaeologists think that, after the destruction of 79 A.D., some
survivors returned to Pompeii and found their homes half-buried in ash.
They tried recover their belongings by digging underground, and some
apparently attempted to rebuild their lives in their old homes, because
they had nowhere else to go.
While their efforts ultimately proved to be futile, they did leave some
historical artifacts behind (e.g. bread oven entirely made of salvaged
materials), and the archaeologists recently unearthed them.
[1]: https://pompeiisites.org/e-journal-degli-scavi-di-pompei/la-ri...
lostlogin wrote 1 day ago:
It’s not hard to imagine people mining the ruins for valuables.
Drunkfoowl wrote 1 day ago:
We are doing it right now :).
aurizon wrote 1 day ago:
looters would dig holes at known rich villas?
inglor_cz wrote 1 day ago:
IIRC the first explosion of 79 AD didn't bury the Pompeii completely.
(It did bury Herculaneum, and much deeper so.) It was another explosion
around the time of collapse of the Western Roman Empire that finished
the job and hid the remaining structures from human view.
dboreham wrote 23 hours 39 min ago:
The 79 eruption buried the first floor. Upper floors (if they
existed) were still visible. Over time the upper floors were
demolished to scavenge the stones to build other villages in the
area. So when the site was "rediscovered " in modern times it was the
first floor that could be excavated.
benwills wrote 1 day ago:
For those interested, there's a new set of hour-long videos on the PBS
site that has more about the recent Pompeii excavations.
There are four so far. Not sure if there will be more:
[1]: https://www.pbs.org/show/pompeii-the-new-dig/
<- back to front page
You are viewing proxied material from codevoid.de. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.