Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
.-') _ .-') _
( OO ) ) ( OO ) )
.-----. ,--./ ,--,' ,--./ ,--,'
' .--./ | \ | |\ | \ | |\
| |('-. | \| | )| \| | )
/_) |OO )| . |/ | . |/
|| |`-'| | |\ | | |\ |
(_' '--'\ | | \ | | | \ |
`-----' `--' `--' `--' `--'
lite.cnn.com - on gopher - inofficial
ARTICLE VIEW:
•
6 min read
The US economy added a stronger-than-expected 147,000 jobs in June and
the unemployment rate fell to 4.1%
By Alicia Wallace, CNN
Updated:
12:44 PM EDT, Thu July 3, 2025
Source: CNN
The US job market continues to chug along despite heightened
uncertainty about the economy and how President Donald Trump’s
tariffs could shake out.
The economy added a stronger-than-expected 147,000 jobs in June, and
the unemployment rate ticked down to 4.1% from 4.2%, according to
Bureau of Labor Statistics data released Thursday.
Last month’s gains, which landed above , marked a slight increase
from May’s total, which was revised up slightly (5,000 jobs) to
144,000. April’s job gains were revised higher by 11,000 jobs, for a
net gain of 158,000.
Those revisions and Thursday’s data bring the three-month average job
growth to 150,000.
However, despite the continuation of fairly solid monthly employment
gains, Thursday’s jobs report once again showed several potentially
concerning signs, including some fissures that may be spreading under
the weight of the Trump administration’s economy-shifting policies.
Less encouraging details emerge
Notably, job growth is not widespread, indicating that the biggest
opportunities are within a select few industries.
The vast majority of the month’s gains were in health care (+58,600
jobs), leisure and hospitality (+20,000 jobs), and state and local
government (+80,000 jobs*). [*The sharp increase here is likely
“artificial,” economists for Pantheon Economics cautioned. More on
that below.]
And when stripping out the public sector gains (the +80,000 was offset
slightly by a loss of 7,000 jobs federally), US private sector
businesses added 74,000 jobs in June, the smallest monthly gain since
October 2024.
“The tariff tax hike, restrictive monetary policy and worries about a
further intensification of the trade war are weighing heavily on labor
demand,” Samuel Tombs, chief US economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics,
wrote in an investor note on Thursday. “Private payrolls excluding
healthcare and education rose by just 23,000, well below the 50,000
average pace in the previous 12 months. Fundamentally, then, this is a
weak report.”
Tombs noted that the mathematical adjustments made by the BLS to smooth
out seasonal fluctuations (think: construction employment surging in
the spring and retail ramping up hiring in advance of Christmas) may
have made the overall numbers look a little more rosy. Education jobs
typically fall in the summertime; however, the decrease was not as
sharp this year, which the seasonal adjustment factor relayed as a
strong gain.
The labor force participation rate ticked down, while the unemployment
rate for Black workers surged by 0.8 percentage points to 6.8%, its
highest rate since January 2022.
The household survey, one of two that feed into the monthly jobs
report, often can have volatile monthly swings; however, rising
unemployment levels for Black workers has in the past served as an
indicator of impending economic weakness.
“There has been this thought that when the economy slows, Black
workers might feel the effects of that more quickly, because they might
be in situations that have less job security,” Daniel Zhao, chief
economist at Glassdoor, told CNN in an interview. “But the timescale
for that tends to be pretty short, and it is very dependent on which
industries are impacted.”
Workers’ wages overall increased at a slower pace than economists
expected. Average hourly earnings rose by 8 cents, or 0.2%, to $36.30
last month, bringing the annual rate to 3.7% from 3.9%.
The headline unemployment rate moving down to 4.1% also may be a
function of a declining labor force, economists cautioned.
“One gets the sense that the cumulative impact of tighter immigration
policy is on the margin beginning to impact the size of the labor force
and will impose a ceiling on any prospective increase in the
unemployment rate as the economy slows,” Joe Brusuelas, chief
economist for RSM US, wrote in a note on Thursday.
Layoff activity remains muted
Stocks were higher Thursday: The Dow rose by 365 points, or 0.8% by
mid-morning. The broader S&P 500 rose 0.8% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq
gained 0.9%.
Trump has introduced a bevy of sweeping policies that have the .
However, questions around how those actions will shake out —
particularly the size and scope of tariffs — have heightened
uncertainty and hampered hiring activity, to some extent.
For several months running, the labor market : Hiring activity is at
near 10-year lows and workers aren’t feeling confident enough to
quit; however, employers, for the most part, are holding on to the
workers they have.
Layoff activity hasn’t accelerated recently, according to a variety
of indicators, including weekly jobless claims data.
On Thursday, the latest batch of claims data showed that first-time
filings for unemployment insurance — considered a proxy for layoffs
— decreased to 233,000 for the week ended June 28 from 237,000 the
week before, according to a separate report released by the Department
of Labor.
While first-time claims aren’t steadily on the rise, people appear to
be having a harder time finding work when they’re unemployed.
Continuing claims, which are filed by people who have received jobless
benefits for at least one week, have been butting up against
three-and-a-half-year highs. During the week that ended June 21
(continuing claims data runs at a lag), those filings were unchanged at
1.964 million, according to the Labor Department report.
Thursday’s jobs report highlighted a similar trend: Job seekers are
staying unemployed for roughly six months, and the share of unemployed
workers who have been out of a job for 27 weeks or longer rose to
23.3%, edging closer to a three-year high, BLS data shows.
The Fed could remain on the sidelines
In periods of high uncertainty, economic data becomes all the more
important to get a grasp on any indications that a downturn could be in
the works.
That’s especially true for the data-dependent Federal Reserve, which
anticipated easing its decades-high interest rates this year but has
held off out of concern that could stoke inflation and and consumers.
“There’s nothing in this report that forces the Fed’s hands to
cut rates earlier than expected,” Zhao said. “It does look healthy
from a top-line view.”
However, there is some concern about how to interpret the number in an
environment where the labor force growth is significantly slowing and
the extent to which lower immigration flows could be contributing to
that, he said.
Ultimately, one of the biggest questions could be around the breakeven
employment growth level (amount of jobs needed to keep pace with labor
force and population growth).
Estimates for the breakeven level, which pre-pandemic was running about
70,000 to 100,000 jobs per month, sometimes soared north of 200,000
jobs in recent years because of heightened levels of immigration.
At this point, considering demographics, an aging workforce and a
slowdown in immigration that started in the mid-point of last year, the
breakeven level is likely closer to 100,000 jobs per month, Deutsche
Bank economists noted in a research report last week.
That could drop even lower, to around 50,000 jobs per month, depending
on whether the result in an outright decrease in the foreign-born
population, they noted.
“If the break-even level of jobs growth is falling, then 147,000 jobs
added might actually be inflationary,” Zhao said. “And if the
unemployment rate stays low or keeps falling and inflation stays high
— especially as tariffs make their way through the supply chain —
the Fed might be pushed to keep rates higher for longer.”
<- back to index
You are viewing proxied material from codevoid.de. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.