Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
.-') _ .-') _
( OO ) ) ( OO ) )
.-----. ,--./ ,--,' ,--./ ,--,'
' .--./ | \ | |\ | \ | |\
| |('-. | \| | )| \| | )
/_) |OO )| . |/ | . |/
|| |`-'| | |\ | | |\ |
(_' '--'\ | | \ | | | \ |
`-----' `--' `--' `--' `--'
lite.cnn.com - on gopher - inofficial
ARTICLE VIEW:
•
4 min read
King Charles’ royal train to be retired as palace cuts costs
By Lauren Kent and Max Foster, CNN
Updated:
7:25 AM EDT, Tue July 1, 2025
Source: CNN
The British royal family’s train will be retired by 2027, as part of
a cost-saving measure announced by Buckingham Palace on Monday after
“a thorough review into its use and value for money.”
The monarchy has been using its own rail travel since Queen Victoria
first boarded a specially built carriage from Slough, England, to
London Paddington Station in 1842. The current royal train, which has
nine carriages that include sleeping quarters and an office, was
introduced in 1977 for Queen Elizabeth II’s Silver Jubilee.
But the costs of royal rail travel rack up quickly, according to the
Royal Household’s annual accounts report, which showed that a visit
by the King to the English county of Staffordshire in February cost
£44,822 ($61,800). Another trip to the Cheshire headquarters of luxury
automaker Bentley last year cost more than £33,000 ($45,700). There
are also hefty costs associated with storing the royal train at a
secure facility in Wolverton, England.
The decision to decommission the train was partly due to “the
significant level of investment which would be required to keep the
Royal Train in operation beyond 2027,” the report said. Meanwhile,
two helicopters provide “a reliable alternative,” it stated. The
royals took more than 140 helicopter journeys over the year, with an
average cost per trip of around £3,370 ($4,600).
The announcement of the train’s retirement was part of the annual
financial statement released by the British Royal Household, which
revealed that the annual lump sum it received from the government
remained at £86.3 million ($118.50 million).
The sum, called the Sovereign Grant, pays for the upkeep of royal
palaces and the royals’ official duties and is funded by . In return,
the monarch hands over all profits from the Crown Estate — which
includes vast swathes of central London property, the Ascot Racecourse
and the seabed around England, Wales and Northern Ireland — to the
government, in an arrangement dating back to 1760.
The Sovereign Grant functions like an expense account for the monarch
and their representatives, covering the costs of their public duties,
including travel, staff, and upkeep of historic properties. Notably, it
excludes funding for security, which also incurs a high cost given the
royals’ numerous public engagements and events.
Royal family members undertook more than “1,900 public engagements in
the UK and overseas, while more than 93,000 guests attended 828 events
at Official Royal Palaces,” the annual Sovereign Grant Report said.
The total grant of £86.3 million ($118.50 million), which by law
remains the same as the three previous financial years, is comprised of
a £51.8 million ($71.1 million), core grant and £34.5 million ($47.4
million) to fund the refurbishment of Buckingham Palace.
Buckingham Palace, a top tourist attraction in central London, is
undergoing a major modernization project that will see upgrades to
electric cabling, pipework, elevators and accessible bathrooms.
The report also said the Royal Household will increase its use of
sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and continue the electrification of its
fleet of vehicles.
Last year, the Royal Household announced it aimed to transition to an ,
without providing a target date. Britain’s PA Media reported that the
King’s two Bentleys would be modified to run on biofuel.
The royal family’s are the Sovereign Grant, the Duchy of Lancaster
and Duchy of Cornwall estates and their personal property and
investments.
The level of funding for the British royal family has long fueled
criticism, with one anti-monarchy group calling for the Sovereign Grant
to be abolished and for the British public to keep all the profits of
the Crown Estate.
“The grant system is mad. Funding goes up not because of any need for
extra money, but because the grant is linked to government profits from
land managed by the Crown Estate,” Graham Smith, a campaigner for the
group Republic, said in a statement earlier this year. “The palace
has recycled the excuse of needing the money for refurbishment of
Buckingham Palace, an excuse used to double the grant ten years ago.”
“It’s time that half a billion pounds was put to good use, that
there was proper accounting for the cost of the monarchy and for that
cost to be slashed to just a few million pounds,” Smith added.
The Keeper of the Privy Purse, James Chalmers, said in a statement on
Monday as the report was released: “Soft power is hard to measure but
its value is, I believe, now firmly understood at home and abroad, as
the core themes of the new reign have come into even sharper focus, and
the Royal Family have continued in their service to the nation, Realms
and Commonwealth.”
<- back to index
You are viewing proxied material from codevoid.de. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.