Network Working Group P. Hoffman
Internet-Draft VPN Consortium
Expires: July 2, 2005 January 2005
The gopher URI Scheme
draft-hoffman-gopher-uri-03.txt
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is subject to all provisions
of section 3 of RFC 3667. By submitting this Internet-Draft, each
author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of
which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of
which he or she become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
RFC 3668.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as
Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 2, 2005.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
Abstract
This document specifies the gopher1 Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)
scheme that was originally specified in RFC 1738. The purpose of
this document is to allow RFC 1738 to be made obsolete while keeping
the information about the scheme on standards track.
1. Introduction
URIs were previously defined in RFC 2396 [RFC2396], which was updated
Hoffman Expires July 2, 2005 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft The gopher URI Scheme January 2005
by draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis [2396bis]. Those documents also
specify how to define schemes for URIs.
The first definition for many URI schemes appeared in RFC 1738
[RFC1738]. Because that document has been made obsolete, this
document copies the gopher URI scheme from it to allow that material
to remain on standards track.
2. Scheme Definition
The gopher URL scheme is used to designate Internet resources
accessible using the Gopher protocol.
The base Gopher protocol is described in RFC 1436 [RFC1436] and
supports items and collections of items (directories). The Gopher+
protocol is a set of upward compatible extensions to the base Gopher
protocol and is described in [Gopher+]. Gopher+ supports associating
arbitrary sets of attributes and alternate data representations with
Gopher items. Gopher URLs accommodate both Gopher and Gopher+ items
and item attributes.
Historical note: The Gopher protocol was widely implemented in the
early 1990s, but few Gopher servers are in use today.
2.1 Gopher URL syntax
A Gopher URL takes the form:
gopher://<host>:<port>/<gopher-path>
where <gopher-path> is one of:
<gophertype><selector>
<gophertype><selector>%09<search>
<gophertype><selector>%09<search>%09<gopher+_string>
If :<port> is omitted, the port defaults to 70. <gophertype> is a
single-character field to denote the Gopher type of the resource to
which the URL refers. The entire <gopher-path> may also be empty, in
which case the delimiting "/" is also optional and the <gophertype>
defaults to "1".
<selector> is the Gopher selector string. In the Gopher protocol,
Gopher selector strings are a sequence of octets which may contain
any octets except 09 hexadecimal (US-ASCII HT or tab) 0A hexadecimal
(US-ASCII character LF), and 0D (US-ASCII character CR).
Gopher clients specify which item to retrieve by sending the Gopher
Hoffman Expires July 2, 2005 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft The gopher URI Scheme January 2005
selector string to a Gopher server.
Within the <gopher-path>, no characters are reserved.
Note that some Gopher <selector> strings begin with a copy of the
<gophertype> character, in which case that character will occur twice
consecutively. The Gopher selector string may be an empty string;
this is how Gopher clients refer to the top-level directory on a
Gopher server.
2.2 Specifying URLs for Gopher Search Engines
If the URL refers to a search to be submitted to a Gopher search
engine, the selector is followed by an encoded tab (%09) and the
search string. To submit a search to a Gopher search engine, the
Gopher client sends the <selector> string (after decoding), a tab,
and the search string to the Gopher server.
2.3 URL syntax for Gopher+ items
Historical note: Gopher+ was uncommon even when Gopher was popular.
URLs for Gopher+ items have a second encoded tab (%09) and a Gopher+
string. Note that in this case, the %09<search> string must be
supplied, although the <search> element may be the empty string.
The <gopher+_string> is used to represent information required for
retrieval of the Gopher+ item. Gopher+ items may have alternate
views, arbitrary sets of attributes, and may have electronic forms
associated with them.
To retrieve the data associated with a Gopher+ URL, a client will
connect to the server and send the Gopher selector, followed by a tab
and the search string (which may be empty), followed by a tab and the
Gopher+ commands.
2.4 Default Gopher+ data representation
When a Gopher server returns a directory listing to a client, the
Gopher+ items are tagged with either a "+" (denoting Gopher+ items)
or a "?" (denoting Gopher+ items which have a +ASK form associated
with them). A Gopher URL with a Gopher+ string consisting of only a
"+" refers to the default view (data representation) of the item
while a Gopher+ string containing only a "?" refer to an item with a
Gopher electronic form associated with it.
Hoffman Expires July 2, 2005 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft The gopher URI Scheme January 2005
2.5 Gopher+ items with electronic forms
Gopher+ items which have a +ASK associated with them (i.e. Gopher+
items tagged with a "?") require the client to fetch the item's +ASK
attribute to get the form definition, and then ask the user to fill
out the form and return the user's responses along with the selector
string to retrieve the item. Gopher+ clients know how to do this but
depend on the "?" tag in the Gopher+ item description to know when to
handle this case. The "?" is used in the Gopher+ string to be
consistent with Gopher+ protocol's use of this symbol.
2.6 Gopher+ item attribute collections
To refer to the Gopher+ attributes of an item, the Gopher URL's
Gopher+ string consists of "!" or "$". "!" refers to the all of a
Gopher+ item's attributes. "$" refers to all the item attributes for
all items in a Gopher directory.
2.7 Referring to specific Gopher+ attributes
To refer to specific attributes, the URL's gopher+_string is
"!<attribute_name>" or "$<attribute_name>". For example, to refer to
the attribute containing the abstract of an item, the gopher+_string
would be "!+ABSTRACT".
To refer to several attributes, the gopher+_string consists of the
attribute names separated by coded spaces. For example,
"!+ABSTRACT%20+SMELL" refers to the +ABSTRACT and +SMELL attributes
of an item.
2.8 URL syntax for Gopher+ alternate views
Gopher+ allows for optional alternate data representations (alternate
views) of items. To retrieve a Gopher+ alternate view, a Gopher+
client sends the appropriate view and language identifier (found in
the item's +VIEW attribute). To refer to a specific Gopher+
alternate view, the URL's Gopher+ string would be in the form:
+<view_name>%20<language_name>
For example, a Gopher+ string of "+application/postscript%20Es_ES"
refers to the Spanish language postscript alternate view of a Gopher+
item.
2.9 URL syntax for Gopher+ electronic forms
The gopher+_string for a URL that refers to an item referenced by a
Gopher+ electronic form (an ASK block) filled out with specific
Hoffman Expires July 2, 2005 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft The gopher URI Scheme January 2005
values is a coded version of what the client sends to the server.
The gopher+_string is of the form:
+%091%0D%0A+-1%0D%0A<ask_item1_value>%0D%0A
<ask_item2_value>%0D%0A.%0D%0A
To retrieve this item, the Gopher client sends the following text to
the Gopher server.
<a_gopher_selector><tab>+<tab>1<cr><lf>
+-1<cr><lf>
<ask_item1_value><cr><lf>
<ask_item2_value><cr><lf>
.<cr><lf>
3. Security Considerations
There are many security considerations for URI schemes discussed in
[2396bis]. The gopher protocol uses passwords in the clear for
authentication, and offers no privacy, both of which are considered
extremely unsafe in current practice.
4 Informative References
[RFC1738] Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L. and M. McCahill, "Uniform
Resource Locators (URL)", RFC 1738, December 1994.
[RFC2396] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396,
August 1998.
[2396bis] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", work in
progress, draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-nn.txt.
[RFC1436] Anklesaria, F., McCahill, M., Lindner, P., Johnson, D.,
Torrey, D. and B. Alberti, "The Internet Gopher Protocol
(a distributed document search and retrieval protocol)",
RFC 1436, March 1993.
Hoffman Expires July 2, 2005 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft The gopher URI Scheme January 2005
Author's Address
Paul Hoffman
VPN Consortium
127 Segre Place
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
US
EMail:
[email protected]
Hoffman Expires July 2, 2005 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft The gopher URI Scheme January 2005
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
[email protected].
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Hoffman Expires July 2, 2005 [Page 7]
