Subj : file areas // Re: Internal codes in Baja
To   : All
From : Jas Hud
Date : Wed Jul 08 2009 07:55 pm

Tegularius wrote:
>   Re: Re: Internal codes in Baja
>   By: Jas Hud to All on Sat Jul 04 2009 17:40:52

> Also by the way, I was considering the possibility of alternate file paths,
> if only because the docs say somewhere that each file area defined takes
> up RAM.  Do you know how much RAM, or at what point this might begin to
> be a problem?  Vertrauen must have well over a hundred.  I recall from
> three years ago (before my disk crash) I was offering the contents of
> at least a dozen CDs, each as a library, and most of them had at least
> thirty areas.  I don't recall that performance suffered.  The trouble with
> alternate paths is that adding more than about eighteen in scfg is a real
> pain because the window keeps bouncing back to the eighteenth.  Perhaps this
> is a bug easily fixed?
>
> ---


i dont think  you really need to use exteral file paths in this day and age.

i probably have more files on the bbs than 90% of the people out there
and i've never had a problem regarding memory or performance.

---
� Synchronet � Vertrauen � Home of Synchronet � telnet://vert.synchro.net

You are viewing proxied material from bbs.kd3.us. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.