Subj : services
To : Digital Man
From : Mcmlxxix
Date : Fri Oct 09 2009 07:06 pm
Re: services
By: Digital Man to Mcmlxxix on Thu Oct 08 2009 10:59 pm
> Um, I just wrote that "documentation" in the post. :-) Think of it like a
> Wiki. :-)
>
well it was so neatly printed, I figured you cut and pasted it. It made me
panic, since that last thing I want to be is another Phil.
> You could have dynamic service instances communicate with eachother as well
> (using Queues, Sockets, or disk I/O). You don't *have* to use a static
> service.
well, it seems that would be more of a hacky way of doing it. I've done enough
things the "less right" way, so I'd like to avoid that if I can. It's starting
to look more and more like I should try to work this all into qengine.js and
run it as a static service, since that wuold keep everything together a lot
better.
I've got a hell of a lot of code in chateng.js and qengine.js already, so if
I've done something the wrong way it's going to suck a major set of balls to
have to rework everything.
---
� Synchronet � My Brand-New BBS (All the cool SysOps run STOCK!)
