Subj : file.iniGetObject()
To : Digital Man
From : MCMLXXIX
Date : Mon Sep 20 2010 09:58 pm
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: Digital Man to MCMLXXIX on Mon Sep 20 2010 15:14:14
> Re: file.iniGetObject()
> By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Tue Sep 14 2010 08:22 pm
>
> > Re: file.iniGetObject()
> > By: Digital Man to MCMLXXIX on Tue Sep 14 2010 16:32:06
> >
> > > Re: file.iniGetObject()
> > > By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Mon Sep 13 2010 10:30 am
> > >
> > > > Would it break anything if calling file.iniGetObject("section");
> > > > returned undefined instead of an empty object if the section
> > > > "section" doesn't exi in the file?
> > > >
> > > > It's kind of a pain to work around that.
> > >
> > > I just committed a change to do that, try it and let me know. Now, one
> > > cavea is that the method will return null/undefined if the specified
> > > section doesn exist in the .ini file *or* it contains no keys/values.
> > > The second condition may prove to be a problem for some scripts. We'll
> > > have to see.
> > >
> >
> > hmm. there's no way to have it both ways?
> >
> > e.g. empty object if the section exists with no keys/values, and
> > null/undefined if it's not there at all
>
> I think I would prefer that behavior. How about you?
>
