Subj : Re: DOVEnet
To : Arelor
From : Boraxman
Date : Tue Jun 10 2025 12:59 pm
-=> Arelor wrote to Jcurtis <=-
Ar> @MSGID: <
[email protected]>
Ar> @REPLY: <
[email protected]>
Ar> [1m[34mRe[0m[34m: [1m[36mRe: DOVEnet
Ar> [34mBy[0m[34m: [1m[36mJcurtis [34mto [36mGAMGEE [34mon
Ar> [36mFri Jun 06 2025 01:53 pm[0m
> I don't have to prove God exists. You can't prove He doesn't.
>
Ar> Well, that is not how logic arguments are arranged.
Ar> I could tell you there is an invisible horse spirit orbiting the moon
Ar> whose spiritual charactereistics make him undetectable and you could
Ar> not disprove that either. I could also tell you a mystical horse from
Ar> heaven walked down and told me and other 5 people about this horse
Ar> spirit and you could not disprove it. You'd be a fool to believe it,
Ar> but I could claim "I don't have to prove The Horse exists. You can't
Ar> prove He doesn't."
If someone wants to convince me of something, and they fail to make
their case, then that is not my problem, that is their problem. I
see many atheists who think this is a shared problem to solve. It
isn't.
I'm perfectly OK with someone having this demented notion that I'm
not "entitled" to not believe". Because I don't care, that problem
is entirely borne on their shoulders.
... BoraxMan
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.49
� Synchronet � MS & RD BBs - bbs.mozysswamp.org