Subj : RE: Pandemic
To   : MRO
From : Ogg
Date : Thu Jan 07 2021 11:29 am

Philthy74 wrote to MRO:
>  >> Only there is no evidence of any major side effects that have higher
>  >> frequencies
>  >> than many other drugs. Sure, it was fast tracked by like 3 years, but
>  >> they d test like 44,000 subjects or something like that.

Arelor wrote to Philthy74:
>  Ar> The problem is not the number of test subjects, but the time spans.

>  Ar> See, if I deploy a drug that causes you to grow a second head the 36th
>  Ar> month after administration, half a million test subjects won't discover
>  Ar> the issue if the test's time span is shorter than 36 months.

MRO wrote:
> they dont even know if this will cause birth defects or cancer in people
> that got the shot.  not enough time has passed.

The last comment is a good point!  The rollout is to the "vulnerable" seniors
first, and if they die (from anything) ..well, they were old anyway, right? :/

Or if they die of other naturaly causes, any damaging effect of the drug will
not be known.

If the goal is to have 50% of the population immunized with that stuff before
there is a sense that the virus is under control, I would rather prefer to be
in the OTHER 50%.

---
� Synchronet � The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada

You are viewing proxied material from bbs.kd3.us. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.