Subj : RE: Language to Transitio
To   : Lizard King
From : Nightfox
Date : Mon Oct 22 2018 10:02 am

 Re: RE: Language to Transitio
 By: Lizard King to ptaylor on Sat Oct 20 2018 01:08 am

LK> I think Ruby should be used to teach object oriented programming. It is SO
LK> object-oriented that it's almost awkward to write procedural code in it
LK> (exactly the opposite of most languages that had objects grafted on after
LK> the fact).

That's not necessarily ideal though.  Some types of projects might lend
themselves better to a more procedural style of coding, and some people might
prefer one or the other.  I'm not sure I like languages that force one style on
the programmer.  I do tend to write most things in an object oriented way
though.  It seems a bit silly in languages that force object-oriented
programming, that their main function has to be a static function that's part
of a class.  :P  Java is like that, at least..

Nightfox

---
� Synchronet � Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

You are viewing proxied material from bbs.kd3.us. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.