Subj : Re: 3d printing
To : Vk3jed
From : Moondog
Date : Mon Sep 23 2019 02:32 pm
Re: Re: 3d printing
By: Vk3jed to Moondog on Mon Sep 23 2019 11:12 am
> -=> On 09-22-19 16:06, Moondog wrote to Vk3jed <=-
>
> Mo> The company making the claims would support their quality claims by
> Mo> showing loads of graphs depicting frequency reponse and attenutation,
> Mo> however Randi said that was immaterial since he wanted a human
> Mo> "expert"to tell them apart in a blind test, not an oscilloscope. They
>
> Well, the product is marketed for use by humans, so actual double blind
> listening tests makes the most sense.
>
> Mo> may have been better in the ways of materials and manufacturing,
> Mo> however the doubt was if their $500 cable was more noticeable than a
> Mo> $25 cable. The audio guy I worked with said price was no concern,
> Mo> since a guy spending $10k on a set of speakers isn't going to bother
> Mo> with nickle and diming over the price of a cable.
>
> Yes, I reckon they would easily sell them. Me? I have too much Scots in my
> ancestry. I'm prepared to spend money for quality, but I'd still pay $50-$1
> for decent electrical cable (copper is still somewhat expensive) than wastin
> $500 on something of dubious benefit.
>
>
> ... A wholesome mind is wasted potential.
You pay extra for the fancy braided cable sheathing and direction arrows
embossed in the connectors.
---
� Synchronet � The Cave BBS - Since 1992 - cavebbs.homeip.net
