Subj : Re: .22 SAA
To : JIMMY ANDERSON
From : Moondog
Date : Fri May 29 2020 10:00 pm
Re: Re: .22 SAA
By: JIMMY ANDERSON to MOONDOG on Fri May 29 2020 02:01 am
> -=> MOONDOG wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
>
> MO> In any hobby there will be some snobbery regards to brand recognition,
> MO> however some brands or specific models earn their reputation, good or
> MO> bad.
>
> MO> Materials and treatment processes determine cost as well as
> MO> manufacturing techniques. Quality control and manufacturing tolerances
> MO> also affect price.
>
> Agreed! In another post, I mentioned doing a polishing of the internal
> parts on my M&P Shield. I don't think it's BAD that I need to do this,
> because if S&W did it themselves on every gun... Well, I wouldn't have
> been able to get it for what I paid for it. :-)
>
> MO> I was watching an interview with the owner of Cimmaron Arms, and his
> MO> company m akes replicas of Old West era revolvers. If you were a SASS
> MO> competition shooter, you'd want a replica over a real Colt Single
> MO> Action Army because of the modern materials and construction methods.
> MO> A vintage SAA's lifespan may have been 500 rounds before requiring
> MO> parts service, while 500 rounds is a couple weeks' practice for a
> MO> modern replica.
>
> LOL - yeah, I can see that. :-)
>
>
>
>
> ... I have a mind like a steel... uh... thingy.
My Performance Center M&P C.O.R.E. shoots fine out of the box.
---
� Synchronet � The Cave BBS - Since 1992 - cavebbs.homeip.net
