Subj : Re: race
To   : Nightfox
From : Boraxman
Date : Sun Jun 01 2025 12:12 pm

-=> Nightfox wrote to Boraxman <=-

Ni> @MSGID: <[email protected]>
Ni> @REPLY: <[email protected]>
Ni>   Re: Re: race
Ni>   By: Boraxman to poindexter FORTRAN
Ni> on Sat May 31 2025 02:23 pm

Ni>  >> I suppose we'll have white folks clinking to what used to be
Ni> the status quo
>> and the rest of the county integrating cultures and ethnicities for some
>> time.

Ni>  Bo> Very simply put.  This "mixing" is occuring in white
Ni> countries.  If you go
Bo> to Nigeria, Korea, Japan, China, Cameroon, Nepal, you won't see that.

Ni>  Bo> See other nations will be able to maintain their identity.
Ni> White nations
Bo> become a "mix".  So white people, and only white people disappear.

Ni> What identity, specifically, are you referring to?  I'm not sure a
Ni> country's identity is mainly defined by the skin color of its
Ni> residents.  It's maybe a statistical factor, but I think the main
Ni> identity of a country is its cultural beliefs, norms, history, etc.

Maybe this is a speficially American thing, where you are taught that
you have no identity?  Elsewhere around the world, this is not a
question.  I'm in Australia, but from Southern European heritage, and I
can tell you in my ancestral country, there is utterly no question at
all of who "we" are.  They consider me one of them, even though I was
born in Australia.

I'm thinking you are in the USA?  Empires tend to think like this.

Ni>  Bo> This "the world will mix" is a pernicious and evil lie, a lie
Ni> that needs
Bo> to die.

Ni>  Bo> The world will NOT become one race.  East Asians, Indians, Sub
Ni> Saharan
Bo> africans will remain as they are.  The end result is one group of people
Bo> going. That is why it is horrendous.

Ni>  Bo> Anyone still advocating this should really be forced to look
Ni> at themselves
Bo> hard in the mirror.
Ni> 
Ni> I've visited Brazil a few times, and while there are groups of certain
Ni> ethniticies there, one thing I thought was interesting is that it seems
Ni> there are a lot more mixed-race people in Brazil than there are in the
Ni> US. Also, I felt like race/skin color isn't really talked about a whole
Ni> lot there.  It's like they just don't really make it an issue.  In some
Ni> ways, I feel like all the talk about race in the US only draws focus to
Ni> it, and perhaps contributes to people of different ethniticites staying
Ni> apart.  The US ended segregation decades ago, but I feel like there's
Ni> still a perhaps unconscious desire people have to stay around people of
Ni> their own skin color.  But I believe in Martin Luther King Jr.'s
Ni> message, that skin color shouldn't matter, and I think everyone should
Ni> be able to live together and mix.  Though I know that isn't necessarily
Ni> the reality today.


Middle and South America was colonised by Iberians. Spanish and
Portuguese.  They had a very different approach to the British.  The
Spanish and Portoguese approach was "assimilation".  Maybe this is a
Catholic thing?  But those colonists made it a point to assimilate with
the native popultion, hence why these countries are very mixed.  The
British did not have this.  Australia actually had a White Australia
policy up until the 1960s.  The British approach was to remain seperate.
So the original Spanish colonists are largely gone in central America,
whereas all the British colonies, remained British up until the "1960s"
ideological poison set in.

The difference then is that countries like Mexico, Brazil, Peru,
Nicaragua, all those central American countries which people seem to be
seeking to flee to go to the USA illegally, are "Blended".  You may not
have seen much focus on race, but I've heard differently, including from
people who lived there.  I think it is clear which approach is better.
You can tell from where people are moving from, and where they want to
move to.  The British approach is clearly better.

Australia though, up until it decided to become "multicultural" was
still distinctly Anglo-Saxon, and maintained its original colonial
identity.

As for MLK, he was a product of his time.  This post WWII ideal is in my
view, dead, and should be buried.  I still cannot believe people are
pushing for this social message.  I put it down to people who just haven't
realised the world has changed, and still think its the late 20th century.

Ask the Whites in South Africa how things are going.   Ask Australias
how the mass immigration is working out.  Or the English.


... BoraxMan
--- MultiMail/DOS v0.52
� Synchronet � MS & RD BBs - bbs.mozysswamp.org