Subj : Re: Most memorable modern
To : phigan
From : Arelor
Date : Thu May 22 2025 01:57 pm
Re: Re: Most memorable modern
By: phigan to Boraxman on Wed May 21 2025 06:58 pm
> Freedom of speech is about someone
> being arrested or somehow legally
> impacted by their speech. Meaning, the
> government shouldn't be able to stop
> you from saying things.
>
> Now, it's your choice to say things
> that other people may not like. And
> it's your employer's choice to employ
> you. Your employer is other people and
> if they don't like what you say, they
> should also have the right to have
> nothing to do with you. Being employed
> is not a right. What if you were the
> employer? Do you want someone telling
> you who you can't fire? Seems silly.
Fundamentally, there is a big difference between recognizing somebody has a right and aproving of the way the right is used.
I may have the fundamental right of hitting my knee with a sledgehammer, that does not mean you have to accept it is a wise course of action.
In the same way, an employer has the fundamental right of not employing people he disagrees with in things that are absolutely not related to the job. And, just the same way, that does not mean I have to believe it is a wise way of managing a firm.
For all the calls we get to diversify the workforce and people is pushing for the notion that we have to eject anybody who does not follow the uniparty out of the workforce. Good job, diversifiers.
--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
---
� Synchronet � Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
