Subj : Judge halts USAID cuts
To   : Jimmy
From : Accession
Date : Fri Mar 21 2025 06:49 pm

Hey Jimmy!

On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 09:38:06 -0400, you wrote:

Ji> This is actually very common. Depedning on the type of case and the
Ji> charges, the term is "preponderence of the evidence", and the "burden of
Ji> proof" is not "beyond a reasonable doubt".  If the burden needs to be
Ji> beyond doubt, then the only two answers are yes/no.  Otherwise (in about
Ji> 80% of all cases), the burdenis lower and the ruling only needs to be it
Ji> "likely happened".

If it's very common, that's probably why they get replaced and/or voted out so often.

That said, I'll "likely" not believe rulings like this, or take them seriously.

Regards,
Nick

... Sarcasm: because beating people up is illegal.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20240604
* Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (723:1/1)
� Synchronet � _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)

You are viewing proxied material from bbs.kd3.us. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.