Subj : Re: what if biden dies
To : DR. WHAT
From : Dumas Walker
Date : Thu Nov 30 2023 12:59 pm
> DW> Nope. Influenza <> SARS.
> Yup, it is.
Nope. The flu is caused by the influenza virus. SARS and COVID are caused
by the coronavirus.
SARS-related coronavirus was first identified in 2002 and resulted in an
epidemic of Severe Accute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) which, ironically,
was originally brushed off as "just another influenza outbreak."
> DW> Because people were isolated and took other precautions, like washing
> DW> their hands more and staying out of each other's faces.
> But isn't that what we were supposed to be doing to avoid COVID? Why did COVI
> cases skyrocket, while flu cases crater?
Because the flu <> COVID. The precautions turned out to be good against
the flu but not so much against COVID. Also, and this is big, the flu is
generally seasonal while COVID was not. People who let their guard down
once the weather got better, who mistakenly thought it was seasonal, got
sick. That was just about the time when more contagious variants took hold.
> You'd think that by taking these precautions both would have dropped.
Not when only one of them is seasonal, and when people got lazy when the
usual flu season was over.
> The fact is that COVID was just the flu and they simply changed their diagnose
> to inflate the COVID case numbers.
Nope. COVID does cause flu-like symptoms, but so do many other diseases
that are also not the flu. These include malaria, hep C, lyme disease,
rabies, polio, dengue, and several bacterial infections. None of these are
caused by the influenza virus.
> DW> These died before.
> People die from the flu every year.
They don't die in the same numbers every year like they were dying of COVID.
> DW> No, sorry, that is not correct. The Elitists may have spouted all
> DW> sorts of incorrect stuff about it after it got to the US, but it was
> DW> another SARS outbreak that eclipsed its predecessors. SARS <>
> DW> Influenza.
> SARS was another nothingburger
While SARS was a nothingburger for most of the world, it was not for the
areas it affected. Luckily, back then, the US government was able to take
measures to limit travel to the affected area, and therefore exposure,
without near as much resistance as they encountered in 2020. So, here in
the US the impact was minimal.
> and, yes, it's the flu.
Nope. Like many other diseases that cause flu-like symptoms, it is not caused
by the influenza virus and is not the flu.
> DW> This "COVID didn't exist" theory is even farther off the mark than the
> DW> "COVID was man-made" mantra, which might actually be true if it came
> DW> from the lab instead of the wet market.
> Perhaps I should be more clear.
> Yes, COVID does exist. But we're talking about the standard Elitist play:
> 1. Take a fact.
> 2. Build a false Narrative around it to push your agenda.
> 3. When people point out the Narrative is false, point to the fact and call
> them a "denier".
Yes, since you've been claiming until this point that it is the flu, being
more clear is probably a good idea.
> "COVID" is 99% false Narrative. The only part that was true is that there's a
> germ. Everything else about it is false.
I won't disagree that many built a narrative around it, including crap
about "we cannot control the spread by restricting travel to the most
affected area (i.e. China)" despite that being proven effective with the last
coronavirus epidemic. That was spun this time to be "racist" because our
politicians are even more owned by the CCP than they were 20 years ago.
The fact that there was a narrative built around it doesn't mean there was
no pandemic, that people didn't get sick, and that people didn't die from
coronavirus.
If anything, we have a "narrative" of crap that mostly assisted Democrats,
and an equally false "anti-narrative" that has been embraced by others.
* SLMR 2.1a * What goes around usually picks up momentum!
