Subj : Re: Russia's Endgame
To : Andeddu
From : Moondog
Date : Thu Oct 06 2022 10:41 pm
Re: Re: Russia's Endgame
By: Andeddu to Dumas Walker on Thu Oct 06 2022 05:24 pm
> Re: Re: Russia's Endgame
> By: Dumas Walker to BORAXMAN on Sat Oct 01 2022 09:53 am
>
> > > I'm not sure, but I'm highly skeptical of the Western narrative.
> > > According to
> > > Western press, Russia has been losing this war since the beginning, and
> > > with the annexation of four territories having occured, it seems hard t
> > > believe this analysis is accurate. Western leaders are just going to
> > > pretend it didn'
> > > happen, but that is what we do in the West now. Play make believe and
> > > excoriate anyone who doesn't go along. Americans like to declare victo
> > > when
> > > they haven't actually won. Americans think that SAYING A makes A a
> > > reality. It's really odd.
>
> Same here. The MSM keep telling us how weak and non-threatening Russia is
> however the reality is the opposite. They had only deployed a small fraction
> their serving military into this "special operation" in Ukraine. We are
> beginning to see a much larger mobilisation now with their recent draft of
> 300,000 troops. They have also been exhausting their old stock of tanks and
> weaponary to soften up the Ukrainians with the more advanced stuff becoming
> known to us soon. I am taking the threat of Russia quite seriously consideri
> the West is financially on the precipice and about to collapse under its own
> weight... just look at what happened in the UK last Monday where there was
> almost a financial and economic meltdown.
>
During the conflict Russia has been losing an average of 500 trained troops a
day. In the approach to Kherson they lost another 2500 in a day or two.
Russia's downfall was a high level of corruption over time. The taking of Kie
v was thwarted by old dry-rotted Chinese military tires that were never replac
ed . New soldiers that have been mobilized are buying their own winter r
gear and camoflage because 1.5 million uniforms are missing. They were eithe
r sold off or the generals who were given funding pocketed the money.
The Russian's anti-rocket reactive armor has been removed and sold off
several years ago, and the soldiers who stole it were long gone. The
pictures of armor on the news are of T-62 tanks, which were considered
effective in the early 1960's. During the onset of war, Russian Su-34's and
37's were ineffective on bombing roles because pilots are trained to fire
precision munitions they hard in small quantities, and were forced to use
their mk I eyeballs to drop (and miss) older dumb bombs.
If Russia was as well equipped and trained as we used to think, Russia
would've taken the Ukraine in 2 or three months. The best upgrade the new
AK12 was the optics rail to facilitate modern optics, however troops were not
issued optics because of the theft concern. The newly mobilised troops are
probably getting AK-74's made in the 70's or even 60's era AK-47's.
I wouldn't be surprised if they issued every other troop a rifle, and assign
his battle buddy with just a magazine.
---
� Synchronet � The Cave BBS - Since 1992 - cavebbs.homeip.net
