Liberal Democrats
https://www.ldp.org.au/

* I skimmed over them very quickly before the federal election. They seem to
 have put plenty of work into the state election, with a well-written set of
 state policies.

* There's a bit of venting over the lockdowns and government's response to
 corresponding protests in their first policies. They want a bill of rights
 to protect individual freedoms, and a list of "safeguards" covering the
 government's capacity to use emergency powers. In principle some of this might
 be good, but I doubt it would really have much practical effect.

* They want to boost the powers of the IBAC anti-corruption body. They're also
 keen that it takes on the role of investigating misconduct complaints against
 Victoria Police, with a curiously specific funding boost of $43.1 million
 between 2022-26 just for policing the police. I'm not entirely sure where
 they're coming from on the latter stuff, but increased power and transparancy
 for IBAC would be good.

* Without attempting many specifics, they want to "End the Nanny State" by
 repealing laws against "victimless crimes". Cannabis possession and vaping,
 as well as some increased speed limits, are their two examples. Hard to say
 how much I'd be with them on this based on what little they say, but those
 two aren't big things for me either way.

* Their favour of personal liberties extends to energy, promising to remove
 bans on gas extraction and nuclear energy while scrapping renewable energy
 targets and subsidies. They'll get their electricity however they damn well
 choose, and they ain't choosing renewables.

* Housing costs will be brought down by scrapping stamp duty tax, plus easing
 planning and zoning regulations. I think things like the recent floods suggest
 developers may be getting away with too much already regarding these
 regulations.

* One of their big points is small government, and they've got a fairly brutal
 plan for achieving it. 10% off the budget of all State departments
 immediately, excluding critical frontline workers. Then 1% cut per year until
 state government debt is repaid. Without adding extra oversight into the
 use of current funding, I expect departments would react to such a hardline
 policy by simply cutting services while maintaining existing wasteful
 practices, but at least I agree on the underlying problem. I do fully support
 their scrapping Labor's Suburban Rail Loop project.

* They want more spending in regional victoria, as well as 25% of the public
 sector workforce working there by 2026. I certainly like the sound of that.
 Though I wonder whether it would really trickle down to the more rural areas,
 or would it mainly just involve a few big cities ouside of Melbourne?



On personal freedoms, many of my strongest views apply to topics like internet
censorship and privacy which are mainly federal topics (and not obviously
represented by them there either). They're another party that's big on broad
aspirations, and from their few specifics I don't find much that particularly
enthuses me.

-----------------------