2020-06-10 - On the Abolition of Policing
-----------------------------------------

In the  interests of encouraging  discourse, I thought I'd  spend a
short  amount  of  time  outlining  what  "Defund the  Police"  and
"Abolish the Police" means, in the context of the present situation
in the United States.

To listen to some on  the right, in  print and TV, you'd  think the
two had the  same meaning, viz. an absence of  any policing at all.
Fact is,  neither of the  phrases actually mean that. That's a "ten
word answer", and should be rejected by everyone as such.

Instead,  both refer  to  *Reform* of  the  Police, neither  phrase
implies an *absence* of policing.

"Defunding the Police"  is in fact the lesser reform.  Its a phrase
designed  to catch  attention,  and  to draw  the  listener into  a
discourse. It  refers, rather, to  the ludicrous levels  of funding
which policing  currently enjoys in  the United States. To  take an
example,  fully 4%  of  all US  GDP is  spent  on Law  Enforcement,
compared to less  than 1% in the EU27. Policing  outcomes, in terms
of crimes solved, police brutality,  deaths of suspects, any metric
you can choose, are far better in the EU for that 1%.

To take  another example,  the Police  Budget for  the city  of Los
Angeles (population  4m) is twice  the size of the  entire Japanese
National Police Force (126m).

Why is this the case? Primarily,  its because since the election of
Richard  Nixon  in  1972,  social services  in  the  United  States
have  been   stripped  of  funding.  Mental   healthcare,  housing,
youth  interventions, drug  awareness  programs, domestic  violence
interventions,  public transportation,  everything was  defunded in
the interests of "fiscal rectitude."

Fact  is, none  of  that money  was  saved, it  just  got spent  on
policing! And  police are the  _last_ people who should  be dealing
with mental  health victims,  domestic violence, the  homeless, the
addicted.

"Defund the  Police" means  taking some of  that money  *back*, and
spending  it where  is *should*  be spent.  That's all.  The Police
would still  continue, maybe with a  little less money to  spend on
tanks and darth vader cosplay.

"Abolish the  Police" is a far  deeper reform, and one  which has a
scary-ass name, one given to it  by right wingers. Like "Defund the
Police", the  phrase covers over  a sea of competing  and disparate
views on  what policing _should_  be, but  they all start  from the
same position - the Disestablishment  of Current Police Forces, and
their replacement with a Community-Based System.

This has  happened many  times, in many  places. Most  famously, it
happened on  this Island, in  2001. Following the Peace  Process in
Northern Ireland, the Royal Ulster  Constabulary was a force out of
time and  place. It was  associated strongly  with one side  of the
conflict,  and  was literally  *lousy*  with  corrupt officers  and
extremists.

So, in  2001, they were  all sacked - every  man and jack  of them.
They were all invited  to apply to a new Police  Force - the Police
Service of Northern Ireland - a force which has community relations
and representation in its DNA.  Has it been an unqualified success?
Lol, no, this  is Northern Ireland, sonny! But it  _is_ better than
what  went before,  costs  massively less  and  has massively  more
community support.

Or, in an american context, the best example is Camden, New Jersey.
That was  routinely named as the  most violent city in  the US, and
its police force had a long history of corruption and infiltration.
Taking the example  of the PSNI, they abolished the  old force, and
invited  the officers  to join  a new  one. The  results speak  for
themselves.  City  crime dropped  in  *half*.  The conviction  rate
increased 2,000%, drug addiction rates plummeted. Deaths in custody
are  now almost  unheard  of, brutality  reports  are minimal,  and
result in automatic suspensions and investigations.

That's what "Abolish the Police" can do. It is the reform which the
United States  is crying out  for. Don't let  propagandists deceive
you,  the  phrases are  cover  for  a  deeper and  more  principled
approach to how lives are lived.

Something I think everyone can get behind.