2019-10-28 - Ephemera, or the Consciousness of Forgetting
---------------------------------------------------------

I've  seen  some  discussion  of  the  question  of  archiving  the
gopherverse.  Solderpunk (as  is their  wont) wrote  a lengthy  and
thoughtful piece [1] which I strongly recommend reading.

(Incidentally, and  as an aside  - I've  never heard of  "the civil
right" in  this context, and  I don't really understand  the usage.
Civil, from  civilis, refers  to society, and  to public  life. The
concept  of civil  rights derives  from  that into  the 1600s,  and
refers to those rights natural  to people which are restrained only
insofar as  necessary for  the public good.  "The civil  right", in
that context, makes no sense to me)

Some of the commentary on solderpunk's piece has  shown, of course,
divided opinion. There are those who claim that all statements made
in  public are,  res  ipsa loquitor,  statements  which become  the
property  of the  public. This  claim is  as nonsensical  as it  is
legally ridiculous.

By making a statement in a public place, I do not pass ownership of
the  content I  have  "performed"  to anyone  else,  I retain  that
ownership, it is  mine, noone elses. I may have  chosen to permit a
certain  group  of people  to  read  it, or  hear  it;  I may  have
restricted that audience in a number of ways, be it my followers on
social media,  or the small  but highly-regarded phlog  audience; I
may have  structured my  comments to that  audience, such  as using
jargon on  a mailing list  which, when  quoted out of  context, can
appear to mean something quite different;  I may just have posted a
stupid or ill-judged photo to my friends.

In each of those  cases, it is specious to claim  that I have given
ownership  of my  posts to  the  public, forever,  without hope  of
retrieval. It is  not the case that I have  surrendered my right to
privacy, forever, to all 7.7bn inhabitants of this earth.

To take an apposite and contemporary example - Katie Hill, when she
consented to her  husband taking intimate photos,  did not consent,
nor  could she  consent,  to  those photos  being  spread all  over
various websites, ending her political career.

In much the same way, I reacted strongly when I realised that posts
I had  made on my phlog  were appearing on *google*  thanks to that
site's  indexing of  gopher  portals.  I did  not  ever consent  to
content  I made  available over  port 70  becoming the  property of
rapacious capitalists.

I  hold the  same  view  regarding archiving  of  gopher sites.  If
confronted with  such a putative  archivist, I would state,  in the
simplest possible terms:

"Who the hell made you the arbiter of this?"

Sysdharma posits  an archival  tag for  publication [2]  a proposal
that  is  not  without  merit.  I think,  however,  that  the  most
appropriate  solution  is  to  have  a  robots.txt  file  for  each
gopherhole, one which allows the content creator the right to say:

"You can archive the posts in the folder marked public/, but that's
all."

The content  creator, after all, is  the *only* person who  has the
right to  make that decision, they  are the only one  who knows the
audience they  are willing  to share something  with, and  the only
ones who are the arbiter of that.

Does this mean that some things will be lost? Yes.

Is this a price worth paying? Absolutely.

We cannot repeat, again, the errors which led us to the modern web.
We  must  not permit  the  same  brigading, the  same  context-free
quoting,  the  same mis-  and  dis-information  which the  web  has
facilitated. We  can start doing  that by protecting the  rights of
content creators.

Content which is ephemeral is not lost. If it has caused a reaction
within us,  then it has  served a  greater purpose than  a thousand
thousand archives of everything which  has ever been. When you read
a  phlog post  or  other  post, remembering  that  it  may be  gone
tomorrow does  not impact your enjoyment  of the post. If  the post
has meaning for  you, then reach out to the  creator, talk to them,
perhaps they  have more to  say which may  be as meaningful,  or as
important.

For  small creatures  such as  we,  the vastness  is bearable  only
thought love

-- Carl Sagan

[1]: gopher://zaibatsu.circumlunar.space/0/~solderpunk/phlog/the-individual-archivist-and-ghosts-of-gophers-past

[2]: gopher://sdf.org/1/users/sysdharma/phlog/./2019.10.28