Many thanks to SWLing Post contributor, Nick Hall-Patch, who shares the
following article originally published in the IRCA’s DX Monitor:
__________________________________________________________________
by William Scott, WE7W
DXing the mediumwaves promises to be an exciting event on April 8
during the 2024 total solar eclipse. I’ve been mulling over the DX
possibilities a lot lately and have come to some conclusions. I think
it boils down to three promising DX scenarios:
* Scenario 1. For those who live within or very near the path of
totality (see Figure 1), I believe best chances of DX would be
first to listen to your southwest, along the path where totality is
approaching. Darkness will already have happened in that direction,
and a certain amount of residual de-ionization of the ionosphere
will still remain. After the point of totality passes your
location, I would swing my attention to the northeast.
* Scenario 2. For those living within about 800 km (or about 500
miles) of the path of totality I believe best chance would be a
perpendicular path across the totality path to a point roughly
equidistant on the other side. This puts the signal reflection
point right at the center of the totality path, or the deepest
point of darkness.
* Scenario 3. For those living more than about 800 km from the path
of totality I believe best chance would be along a line from your
receiving site to a perpendicular intersection to the totality
path. This should define the greatest shaded path.
I think that scenarios #1 and #2 have the best possibility for DX.
Figure 1 (Click to enlarge)
Across the U.S. and Canada, from its entry at Texas to its exit through
NE Canada and into the Atlantic Ocean, the totality path width varies
from a maximum of 199 km at U.S. entry to about 160 km at Atlantic
exit, or 123 to 99 miles.
Important to keep in mind – skywave signal strength analysis is based
almost entirely on the condition of the ionosphere at the reflection
point, not at the receiving site. For single hop propagation, normally
the reflection point is at the halfway point to the station along the
great circle route. That 800 km distance from the totality center I
wouldn’t hold as gospel. I’m throwing that figure out as a point where
scenario #2 may start to transition to scenario #3.
Timing is of the essence for DXing. The shadow velocity exceeds 1000
mph, increasing from 1587 miles per hour at Eagle Pass, Texas to 3176
mph at Houlton, Maine. You may have only minutes to DX. I’ll be in
Rochester, NY at the time of totality, and we are right at dead center.
I’ll be scenario #1. My plan is to listen to my southwest initially,
where totality is approaching. I’ll be listening particularly for
WLW-800 in Cincinnati, OH, WHAS-840 in Lexington, KY, and others along
or near that path.
Scenario #2 possibly holds the most promise. Calculate your distance to
the path center line and look for stations on a direct line across the
totality path and at an equal distance on the opposite side of the path
from you. One such scenario might be WSB-750, Atlanta to a reception
point in northwestern Illinois, central Iowa, or southern Wisconsin or
southern Minnesota. Many possibilities on cross-paths exist here. I
feel best results would be with a signal path that crosses the path of
totality closest to 90 degrees.
A question was raised about the possibility of DX from Spokane,
Washington, an extreme distance from the path of totality. That
particular scenario would be scenario #3, more than 800 km to the path
of totality. Maximum obscurity should be when northeast Texas (let’s
say the Dallas area) is experiencing full totality, as the great circle
line to the totality path intersects at approximately 90 degrees to the
line at that point. This would be at about 1848 UTC. I would listen for
any signals along a great circle path between Spokane to anywhere from
the Dallas area and northward. Obviously, Spokane to Dallas is an
extremely long one hop path, at about 2450 km. At that distance, the
reflection point is near Denver, which will have a solar obscuration of
65.1% at maximum.
A Dallas area reception would be next to impossible I would think, but
there are many more stations along that great circle path one could try
for. Closer stations will obviously move the reflection point closer
and start to reduce the solar obscurity. I did a scan along that path
and there are some 340 stations within 200 km either side of the line
of the great circle path between Spokane and Dallas.
A presumed Scenario #4.
Another scenario was suggested by Nick Hall-Patch, that of reception
parallel to the path of totality and outside the 100% totality band.
The 2017 solar eclipse across the northern part of the U.S. was DXed
extensively and produced some interesting results, which are well
documented in IRCA Reprints. Check their document repository here:
[1]
http://dxer.ca/images/stories/2019/irca-reprint-index.pdf
Nick reports: “The receptions of KSL-1160 described in IRCA Reprint
[2]# G-096 showed the results of 3 DXers listening across the path of
the eclipse (Scenario #2), but the fourth, Dave Aichelman, was
monitoring KSL from a location parallel to the eclipse path ( sort of
Scenario #1?) and got very good enhancement as well.” We might name
this “Scenario #4”.
I checked out [3]# G-096, that documents the KSL reception from the
solar eclipse of 2017. It looks like the Dave Aichelman (at Grants
Pass, OR) reception of KSL had a mid-path reflection point of about 95%
solar obscurity. The distance was 971 km (602 miles). Graphing KSL, I
see it has a nice fat low angle takeoff and impressive skywave strength
at 900 km, some 1.3 mV/m for that distance. (ed. note: A map of
fractional solar obscuration is in Figure 2, easily converted to the
percentage figures quoted in this article. )
Better yet, the article indicated Aichelman also received XEPE-1700
across the Mexican border from San Diego too. That was a mid-point
reflection obscurity of only about 83% as far as I can deduct from the
maps. The distance was 1238 km (769 miles). The mid-path reflection
point there was in the neighborhood of 700 km from the central path of
totality.
So, DX is indeed possible where both the station and the receiver are
off center from the totality path. It’s looking like anything from at
least 80% obscurity at mid-path reflection may have some real
possibilities, particularly if you are at the end nearest the path of
totality. Lower obscurities, perhaps down to 50% or so may even produce
results.
Check out these links.
[4]
https://nationaleclipse.com/cities_partial.html
[5]
https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEpath/SEpath2001/SE2024Apr08Tpath.htm
l
[6]
https://eclipse2024.org/eclipse_cities/statemap.html
Using my pattern mapping program which has extensive area search
capability, I’ve compiled a list of all US and Canadian stations that
fall within the 2024 Solar Eclipse path of ~100% totality. There are
456 stations. Results are drawn from the March 20 FCC LMS database and
Industry Canada database. Sorry I don’t have Mexico available.
If you would like this list, download from this link.
[7]
https://www.mediafire.com/file/125ih5yrmw4puib/2024-eclipse-stations
-by-longitude.zip/file
Across the US and Canada, from its entry at Texas to its exit through
NE Canada and into the Atlantic Ocean, the totality path width varies
from a maximum of 199 km at US entry to about 160 km at the Atlantic
exit off Newfoundland, or 123 to 99 miles. 456 stations are found in
this eclipse path. I purposely set the path width to 210 km from start
to finish. This gives a few km slop on both sides of the 100% totality
path for good measure.
Unzip the downloaded .ZIP file, where you will find 3 files. The
stations in each file are sorted by longitude, from west to east. This
gives us the progression of the eclipse path, with the eclipse starting
at the first station in the list and ending with the last station.
File #1 is a simple text file.
File #2 is in .CSV format. You can easily input it to an Excel file.
File #3 is in .HTML format. It includes links to each station’s Google
Map latitude-longitude coordinates for the satellite view of the
transmitter tower array.
Another link takes you to the FCC AM Query link for that station. I
hope these files are beneficial. There should be many propagation path
possibilities outside of this list as well.
(reprinted from the author’s blog at
[8]
https://radio-timetraveller.blogspot.com/ )
********
Further sources of information concerning the eclipse include the
following websites:
[9]
http://xjubier.free.fr/en/site_pages/solar_eclipses/TSE_2024_GoogleM
apFull.html?Lat=43.66400&Lng=-76.13690&Elv=88.0&Zoom=6&LC=1
(Clicking anywhere on this map page will give all the information you
need about obscuration, length of eclipse etc.at a given location).
Also:
[10]
https://www.greatamericaneclipse.com/april-8-2024
[11]
https://eclipsewise.com/2024/2024.html
Animations of the path of the eclipse versus time can be seen at:
[12]
https://eclipsewise.com/solar/SEanim400/2024_04_08_TSE_400px.gif
[13]
http://7dxr.com/4all/100km8Apr-movie–Frissell-HamSCI.mp4
The latter is particularly interesting, as it shows the moon’s shadow
at 100km height above the earth, an area of special interest to DXers,
as it is the lower edge of the E-region of the ionosphere. Note
especially that as the eclipse ends over the North Atlantic Ocean, that
there is a temporary darkness path between Europe and North America,
because night will already have fallen in Europe. So will there be
blips of TA DX in eastern North America as the eclipse passes by?
Listen, and find out!
Finally, our DX could be of interest to ionospheric physicists also.
The rapidly changing listening conditions will be indicating a
similarly turbulent ionosphere, and DXers’ documenting those listening
conditions through SDR recordings could provide information that will
be useful to scientists who want to gain a better understanding of the
Earth’s ionospheric dynamics.
HamSCI is an organization of volunteer citizen-scientists and
professional researchers who study upper atmospheric and space physics,
and will be interested in examining MW DXers’ wideband SDR recordings
made during the eclipse period, and indeed, in having DXers assist with
HamSCI’s research. (see [14]
https://hamsci.org/eclipse. Especially if
you are an amateur radio operator, there are several other ways that
you might also contribute to the project.)
(This first appeared in IRCA’s DX Monitor and is used with permission.
See [15]
https://www.ircaonline.org/default.php for club details)
References
Visible links:
1.
http://dxer.ca/images/stories/2019/irca-reprint-index.pdf
2.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AMJtjcRMjq09oqmuLhrBq5urlTQIVoGs/view?usp=sharing
3.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AMJtjcRMjq09oqmuLhrBq5urlTQIVoGs/view?usp=sharing
4.
https://nationaleclipse.com/cities_partial.html
5.
https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEpath/SEpath2001/SE2024Apr08Tpath.html
6.
https://eclipse2024.org/eclipse_cities/statemap.html
7.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/125ih5yrmw4puib/2024-eclipse-stations-by-longitude.zip/file
8.
https://radio-timetraveller.blogspot.com/
9.
http://xjubier.free.fr/en/site_pages/solar_eclipses/TSE_2024_GoogleMapFull.html?Lat=43.66400&Lng=-76.13690&Elv=88.0&Zoom=6&LC=1
10.
https://www.greatamericaneclipse.com/april-8-2024
11.
https://eclipsewise.com/2024/2024.html
12.
https://eclipsewise.com/solar/SEanim400/2024_04_08_TSE_400px.gif
13.
http://7dxr.com/4all/100km8Apr-movie--Frissell-HamSCI.mp4
14.
https://hamsci.org/eclipse
15.
https://www.ircaonline.org/default.php
Hidden links:
17.
https://swling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/spectrum-with-1886-flat.jpg
18.
https://swling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Eclipse-Figures-1.jpeg
19.
https://swling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Eclipse-Figures-2.jpeg