[1]Home
> [2]Anti-Piracy > [3]Site Blocking >
The Dutch pirate site blocklist has expanded with two new targets,
shadow libraries Anna's Archive and Library Genesis. The court order
was obtained by local anti-piracy group BREIN, acting on behalf of
major publishers. Interestingly, Z-Library isn't listed in the blocking
order, despite explicit warnings previously issued by BREIN.
stop Pirate site blocking is one of the entertainment industry’s
favorite enforcement tools. In recent years, it’s become a common
practice in many countries around the world.
In the Netherlands, it took over a decade for the first order to be
approved. After detours through the Supreme Court and the EU Court of
Justice, the final order was issued in 2020, [4]targeting The Pirate
Bay.
With all the legal paperwork in order, the doors were open to more
blocking requests, especially after rightsholders and local ISPs
[5]signed a covenant to streamline the process. If a court orders one
company to block pirate sites, by agreement the other ISPs will follow
suit.
After the initial Pirate Bay blockade, a follow-up order targeted
[6]YTS, EZTV and other torrent sites in 2022. Last year, Lookmovie and
Flixtor were singled out in yet another case, despite a challenge to
the [7]‘dynamic’ nature of these orders, which allows new domains to be
added continuously.
Blocking Shadow Libraries
All blocking requests were submitted by local [8]anti-piracy group
BREIN, which acts on behalf of rightsholders. These include the major
Hollywood studios but BREIN’s purview is much broader. Last week, it
obtained the latest blocking order, this time on behalf of the
publishing industry.
Issued by the Rotterdam District Court, the order requires a local
Internet provider to block two well-known shadow libraries; “Anna’s
Archive” and “Library Genesis” (LibGen).
News of this new court order was shared by BREIN which notes that both
sites were found to make copyright infringing works available on a
large scale. At the time of writing, a published copy is not available
but, based on the covenant, all large Internet providers are expected
to implement the blockades.
“These types of illegal shadow libraries are very harmful. The only
ones who benefit are the anonymous owners of these illegal services.
Authors and publishers see no return on their efforts and investments,”
BREIN comments.
“Copyright holders deserve an honest living. There are numerous legal
ways to obtain ebooks. If desired, this can also be done very cheaply;
through the library for example.”
Dynamic Order
The Rotterdam court issued a so-called ‘dynamic’ blocking order,
meaning that rightsholders can update the targeted domains and IP
addresses if the sites switch to new ones in the future. This also
applies to mirrors and increases the blockades’ effectiveness, as there
is no need to return to court.
Previously, Internet provider KPN challenged these ‘dynamic’ orders,
suggesting that they are too broad. The court rejected this argument,
however, noting that the process [9]hasn’t led to any major problems
thus far.
BREIN further reports that Google is voluntarily offering a helping
hand. As [10]reported in detail previously, the search engine removes
blocked domains from its local search results after being notified
about an ISP blocking order.
“The effectiveness of the blocking measure is increased because Google
cooperates in combating these infringements and, at the request of
BREIN, completely removes all references to websites that are blocked
by order of the Dutch court from the search results,” BREIN writes.
Elephant in the Room
The blockade of the two shadow libraries is a key victory for BREIN;
Anna’s Archive and LibGen are the largest sites of their kind along
with a similar platform, Z-Library. Interestingly, however, the latter
is not part of this blocking order.
Z-Library is the target of an [11]ongoing criminal investigation by the
U.S. Government, an enforcement effort in which BREIN also [12]played a
role. It is not clear why the site isn’t part of the blocking request,
however.
This ‘omission’ is notable considering the anti-piracy group’s earlier
stance. After Z-Library’s initial shutdown, [13]BREIN explicitly warned
that it would obtain a court order to block Z-Library if it came back
online.
Instead of going after Z-Library, BREIN’s latest blocking request
targets two other shadow libraries. BREIN must have its reasons not to
include Z-Library in this legal effort but the group didn’t immediately
respond to our request for clarification.
References
1.
https://torrentfreak.com/
2.
https://torrentfreak.com/category/anti-piracy/
3.
https://torrentfreak.com/category/anti-piracy/site-blocking/
4.
https://torrentfreak.com/dutch-isps-must-block-pirate-bay-proxies-and-mirrors-again-court-rules-201015/
5.
https://torrentfreak.com/brein-signs-landmark-pirate-site-blocking-agreement-with-dutch-isps-211105/
6.
https://torrentfreak.com/dutch-pirate-site-blocklist-expand-with-rarbg-yts-eztv-220331/
7.
https://torrentfreak.com/isps-dynamic-injunction-fears-fail-to-prevent-lookmovie-flixtor-blocking-230601/
8.
https://stichtingbrein.nl/
9.
https://torrentfreak.com/isps-dynamic-injunction-fears-fail-to-prevent-lookmovie-flixtor-blocking-230601/
10.
https://torrentfreak.com/google-removes-pirate-bay-domains-from-search-results-citing-dutch-court-order-211130/
11.
https://torrentfreak.com/u-s-indicts-two-russians-for-running-the-z-library-piracy-ring221117/
12.
https://torrentfreak.com/brein-plans-to-have-z-library-blocked-by-isps-if-it-resurfaces-221126/
13.
https://torrentfreak.com/brein-plans-to-have-z-library-blocked-by-isps-if-it-resurfaces-221126/