#[1]ASCII by Jason Scott » Feed [2]ASCII by Jason Scott » Comments Feed
  [3]ASCII by Jason Scott » Preparing for the Incoming Computer Shopper
  Tsunami Comments Feed [4]alternate [5]alternate [6]alternate

                           [7]ASCII by Jason Scott

  Jason Scott's Weblog

Preparing for the Incoming Computer Shopper Tsunami — June 5, 2023

  There’s no way for me to know where your awareness starts with all
  this, so let’s just start at the beginning.

  Computer Shopper was a hell of a magazine. I [8]wrote a whole essay
  about it, which can be summarized as “this magazine got to be very
  large, very extensive, and probably served as the unofficial ‘bible’ of
  the state of hardware and software to the general public throughout the
  1980s and 1990s.” While it was just a pleasant little computer tabloid
  when it started in 1979, it quickly grew to a page count that most
  reasonable people would define as “intimidating”.

  In a world that saw hundreds of magazines and thousands of newsletters
  come and go about technology and computer-related subjects, Computer
  Shopper was its own thing entirely. Not only thick as a brick, but
  clearly opened to anyone who waved cash and covering vendors who were
  selling computer components down to the individual part level. You
  might have a good set of ads in PC Magazine but to browse over price
  lists of capacitors, power supplies and wiring, the massive monthly
  Computer Shopper issue was going to be your go-to.

  There were two other aspects to Computer Shopper that has given it a
  halo of intrigue and positive memory: First, the paper was incredibly
  cheap, newspaper tabloid level by some eyes. This seeming disposability
  infers a weird sort of honesty about the advertising contents – it is
  what it is, it represents what the actual pricing is, and what’s
  actually available. The lack of pure slickness in the printing process
  was a baggage of “look, I’m lucky if we survive another month and this
  is the straight up price we’re offering” across the many hundreds of
  ads in a given issue.

  But second, was the full-bore willingness to seemingly absorb anything
  computer adjacent into its pages. Pre-fab computers and commercially
  available software was listed inside, sure. But if you were selling
  tech clothing, clips, floppies, tapes, plugs, paper, switches and
  accessories… you had a home there as well. It gave a truly manic and
  freewheeling melee to the affair, and for those of us who wanted to
  know more than the standard 20-30 software packages everyone was
  buying, or to think about smacking together a bunch of parts to get a
  mutant-powerful system up and running, this was the place.

  To a smaller set of us, the BBS Listings in the back were also a very
  notable aspect. BBS operators across all the spectrum of cliques and
  locations thought of Computer Shopper as the BBS yellow pages, the
  phone book of the online, for almost its entire run. You flipped to the
  back, found your area code or state, and downright eye-watering levels
  of BBS listings were waiting for you. Inaccurate? Sometimes. But a
  truly unique assemblage of what was.

  That catches us all up to what Computer Shopper was. Like many
  print-based computer magazines, Computer Shopper grew in size into the
  many of hundreds of pages, some greater than 800. It thrived in the
  world before the World Wide Web took hold, and once you could do daily
  updates of parts and prices at various websites, the months-lag in
  printing schedule and the lack of responsiveness compared to websites
  made it lose curry, favor, and eventually pages. It died a quiet death
  in 2009, becoming a barely interesting site and then an uninteresting
  zombie.

  Still, it was a heck of a run.

  People often ask me the same basic questions regarding old computer
  history and access to it. One of them is to discuss potential holy
  grails, possibilities of where some effort might be afforded to acquire
  potentially lost information or artifacts before they’re gone.

  A common go-to for me was Computer Shopper, because it’s a perfect
  storm of absolute fascination and completely intolerable amounts of
  barriers towards digitizing it into something readable online.
    * It’s fantastically huge. If you scan in an issue, however you do
      it, you’re talking hundreds of pages for that month, all of them
      requiring babysitting to ensure they got through.
    * The cheap, cheap paper is a nightmare to run through a scanner –
      either a flatbed-based misery or a sheet-fed scanner that’s one
      molecule of damage away from crunching pages up.
    * The gutters (space between the spine and the information on the
      page) is offensively small – millimeters where there should be a
      half-inch. Especially towards the 1990s era, the instructions to
      advertisers about layout clearly didn’t make many bones about
      informing folks about margins. This means the books have to be
      split apart, a despicable sin that strikes against the heart of the
      pure.
    * These myriad, no-gutter, cheaply-printed pages are both tabloid
      size and never considered text too small to allow. This means that
      not only is the page size not going to fit in 95% of the consumer
      scanners out there, but they’re going to need to be scanned at the
      highest level you can, to not miss anything. The page size,
      digitized, is going to be offensively huge.

  So, the prospect this would ever happen was basically zero. You needed
  someone who had the time, inclination, and support to do what was going
  to be one of the more painful scanning projects extant.

  It turned out to be me.

  So, there I was whining online about how it was 2023 and nobody seemed
  to be scanning in Computer Shopper and we were going to be running into
  greater and greater difficulty to acquire and process them
  meaningfully, and I finally, stupidly said that if we happened on a
  somewhat-complete collection, I’d figure out how to do it.

  And then an ebay auction came up that seemed to fit the bill.

  Out in Ohio, someone decided to sell nearly 200 issues of Computer
  Shopper for a few thousand bucks.

  It’s important to understand the usual per-issue prices for Computer
  Shopper, and that usual per-issue price can get as high as $50 an
  issue. Obviously, at some large scale, this becomes an untenably large
  price. But in this case, they were being sold for about $13 an issue,
  which is not zero, but somewhere in the realm of manageable: About
  $3,000 for the lot.

  Now, I’m not going to have $3,000 to throw around like that. So I put
  the challenge out there: If people get together and give me $3,000,
  I’ll buy this lot and scan it it.

  It hit goal in about 3 hours.

  As you might have figured out, delivery/mail was not an option. To make
  that happen, I reached out for a volunteer, and a few people came
  forward, including Wes Kennedy, who made this his main project for a
  few days. He’d left one job and was starting another a week later, and
  “picking up all the issues, packaging them carefully, and putting them
  in the mail to Jason” became his fun-cation. He deserves all the kudos
  for this.
  When 14 large boxes arrived, they included all the issues, put inside
  large paper envelopes and wrapped in blue plastic that definitely
  didn’t look like cocaine to the storage unit guys I cruised past.
  So all of the issues were now safely within my control.
  One might be inclined to say “Well, that’s only half the problem.” and
  you’d be off, because it’s actually less than a quarter of the problem.
  Acquisition, after all, was just money – buying issues in bulk and
  ending up with a good amount of them was just a case of assembling some
  cash.

  No, it was definitely the scanning that was going to be the big ….
  issue.

  If not obvious, the pages of this tabloid-sized periodical are not just
  big, they’re over the bounds of pretty much every scanner out there, at
  least in the consumer space. (There’s plenty of large-format scanners
  past the $5,000 range, and they’re also gargantuan affairs, meant to
  handle blueprints and posters.)
  But I did find one commercial scanner that could do the work: A Fujitsu
  fi-7480 wide-size sheet-feed scanner, which tops out at about $3,500.
  I’ll simply say a kind anonymous donor bought it outright so I wouldn’t
  have to crowdfund for it, and for that I’m eternally grateful.

  Here’s what dealing with that process looks like, with the scanner
  software (Vuescan) set carefully to neutral and pulling in the massive
  pages through the fi-7480:

  …which brings up the situation involving the pages.

  Now, about 12 years ago, I really [9]raked someone over the coals for
  destroying copies of BYTE magazine to scan them. He was not happy about
  this at all, and there’s a chance he may have stopped his project just
  not wanting to deal with such criticism. I hope not, but I do stand by
  the fact that he indicated he was immediately disposing of the pages
  after scanning them, which meant any mistakes or oversights were
  permanent. (At one point, he mentioned having to fish a page out of the
  trash when he discovered he’d skipped it.)
  At that point, I made a declaration of my standards for
  debinding/pulling apart a magazine to scan it:

  “IF I have a document or paper set that requires some level of
  destruction to scan properly AND IF I have three copies of it AND IF
  there is no currently-available digital version of the document AND IF
  there is a call or clamor for this document set THEN AND ONLY THEN I
  will split the binding and scan at a very high resolution and
  additionally apply OCR and other modern-day miracles to the resulting
  document so that the resulting item is, if not greater than the
  original, more useful to the world.”

  …I should have added an OR.

  “…OR if there’s very little chance of anyone ever being able to
  assemble issues to scan in the foreseeable future.”
  Because that’s rapidly what was happening with the Computer Shoppers.
  $13 an issue is perhaps quite a bit, but people want even more for
  individual issues and it will be a bit of a stretch to actually acquire
  them all. So, even though I don’t own 3 copies personally, I also know
  the other two potential copies are passing among collectors at this
  point, so they’re being held, in some way, in trust. It’s my hope that
  I’ll eventually have a chance to do this work for all the issues, but
  until then, I work with what I got.

  Debinding, the taking apart of a bound issue of a magazine to turn it
  into a stack of papers to scan in, turns out to be a process. A
  painful, time consuming, involved process. One which I knew would be
  involved but not as involved as it has definitely turned out to be.

  Luckily, people have come before me. [10]There is a rather beautiful
  documentation out there, about the best practices in debinding
  magazines, from Retromags. They walk through the pros and cons, the
  potential issues, the considerations while doing it, and the most
  common pitfalls that will befell your project if you don’t stay on top
  of them. I read this like the Book of Life before setting off on
  dealing with Computer Shoppers, because their “how to ski” primer was
  going to be critical as I skied backwards down a double-black-diamond
  slope of these bible-sized monsters.
  In this case, I have to use a heat gun, aiming them at the glued issues
  of Computer Shopper, warming them up until the glue starts to become
  slightly liquid and then carefully pulling the pages apart from each
  other, placing them on a large table I’m working on. If the glue comes
  too close to the pages after I pull them apart, it actually sticks them
  back again. It’s a huge mess, and with hundreds of pages in a typical
  issue, hours of work.

  There are banger groups out there working tirelessly to debind
  magazines, scan them in carefully, fix any issues with the looks, and
  upload them to various locations. One of them is [11]Gaming Alexandria
  and it’s been a pleasure to fall in with them and discuss the
  nitty-gritty of this process. They’re scanning in obscure periodicals
  at scale and they know what they’re up to.

  In fact, we’ve made a deal, where I’m just focusing on the “Raw Scans”,
  and these raws will go to them for post-processing, creating a more
  readable or functional set of final readable versions of Computer
  Shopper for people to appreciate. The Raws will always be available, of
  course – 600dpi TIFF files scanned neutrally of the original pages,
  placed together in mothra-sized .ZIP files that number up into the many
  gigabytes, for people to pull down when needed.

  A scanned page of a typical issue looks like this (with a little size
  reduction for this essay):

  You can see immediately the difficulties and intricacies of this
  project.

  Like I indicated, there was very little care for margins, and none for
  minimum size of text. Computer Shopper advertisers did whatever they
  wanted, however they wanted, and into newsprint, which further made
  things whacky because bleed is a major issue, pulling the other side’s
  ink into the current one. And all of this on a massive piece of paper –
  so in total, the original TIFF file of this image is a full-on 20
  megabytes – and this issue has over 400 pages.

  And before I forget to mention… I did a test scan with an issue that I
  had two copies of, to work out any major bugs and problems. And one
  major problem was that there was a roller at the top of the feed
  scanner meant to separate a stack of pages into single ones and feed
  them in properly. Well, that roller grips the page so tightly, it
  started to pick up ink and put it on later pages, leaving streaks on
  the page. A quick browse through the service manual, and I had to
  remove that roller entirely. This means that I have to feed the pages
  in, one by one, since otherwise it’ll stick them together and jam.

  Through all of this, we’re talking hours of work to do a single issue,
  and I have to do it a couple hundred times at least. This is going to
  be quite an epic task… which is, again, why we’re down to me doing it
  because the combination of cost, time and effort leaves almost nobody
  else who’d be in a position to be able to do, much less want to.

  We did one issue, [12]February 1986, “all the way through”. I debinded
  it, cropped it, scanned it, handed it to Gaming Alexandria to process,
  got it processed, and then put it on Internet Archive, resulting in
  three sets of images: The Raw Scans, a “Readable” version and an
  “Aesthetic” version.

  The “Readable” version has been heavily processed and contrasted. It
  makes it very easy to read a page because it has a really nice
  dependable color setup for it:

  Contrasted with the “Aesthetic” version, that looks more like you would
  expect the newsprint and bleed-through original to look:

  I personally prefer the “Aesthetic” – it brings me back to the way
  things were when I would buy Computer Shoppers at the local Microcenter
  and scour them for information and inspiration. But a researcher, and
  more importantly an Optical Character Recognizer prepping things for
  searches by researchers, will much prefer working with the Readable
  version.

  Now, Here Comes The Pitch.

  So, I live here now.

  For the next however-long-it-takes, I’ll be debinding issues, doing
  careful scans of them, then putting the resulting piles of pages into
  baggies and sending them into cold storage for permanent holding,
  awaiting the next time they might have use, or to redo a problematic
  scan. That’s happening. I’m just going to be on this all year, when I
  can.

  But this effort of mine is rather meaningless unless there are real
  humans and smart scripts going over what’s being produced.

  By a back of the napkin calculation, there will be at least 100,000 and
  more likely 150,000+ pages of Computer Shopper issues scanned during
  this project. There’s going to be a lot of them, and they’re going to
  be jammed full of information, imagery, embarrassment and glory.

  I really hope that a group of people, together or separately, start
  using this bounty to rip out BBS listings, find trends in pricing and
  nomenclature, in tracking down humble beginnings and finding other
  amazing tidbits throughout computing history.

  It’s nice to drop 400-800 pages at once into an item, but unless I get
  some of those nerds out there scouring the pages for interesting
  things, it’s just me scanning into a void.

  If you know people will be interested, help them become aware. And if
  you see something interesting, bring it out and make it part of
  sharing, wherever you want to.

  This will be an incredible amount of work. Folks threw thousands of
  dollars into acquisitions of hardware and paper and I’m going to blast
  a lot of my personal time into scanning these.

  Make it worth it.

  Addendum:

  This entry got a lot of attention. Two questions arose, and I’ll answer
  them both here:

  Are There Missing Issues?

  Yes, there are. Here’s the list. If people want to donate or buy good
  quality copies for me, mail me at [email protected]. Here’s the
  missing issues as far as I can tell:
    * Everything before November 1983
    * 1984: January, October, November
    * 1985: October
    * 1986: December
    * 1988: June, November
    * 1989: April
    * 1994: April, May, August, November
    * 1995: February, March
    * 1996: April, May, June
    * 1997: July, September
    * 1998: January, May
    * 1999: April, July, August

  If people send them to me, I’ll take them off this list. So if this
  list is here, I’m still missing them.

  Can I Help Support You?

  [13]Just enjoy the Podcast. I spend a lot of time on it.

Share this:

    * [14]Share
    *

    * [15]Email
    * [16]Facebook
    * [17]Reddit
    * [18]Twitter
    *
    __________________________________________________________________

  Categorised as: [19]Uncategorized
    __________________________________________________________________

35 Comments

   1. [20]Kirkland says:
      [21]June 5, 2023 at 3:49 am
      I second how awesome Hubz at Gaming Alexandria is. I worked with
      him a bit on his old scanning guide before dropping out to work on
      my SNES and PS2 manual scans. If they are helping with processing
      scans, I should see if they are up to fixing my PS1 raws- editing
      is slowing progress down.
      I collected Computer Shoppers throughout the 80s and 90s- my uncle
      sold computers when I was a kid and I built easily 50+ systems as a
      sideline during my college years. Every month I would dig through
      the Computer Shopper looking for deals and tracking prices. I think
      I had about 12 feet of them stacked on my bookshelves before the ex
      cleaned house and chucked them all.
      [22]Reply
   2. [23]Trevor Edwards says:
      [24]June 5, 2023 at 5:04 am
      Godspeed, man!
      I remember sitting in the back of a local used bookstore scouring
      the pages of Computer Shopper back issues when I was a kid. Great
      times!
      [25]Reply
   3. Peter says:
      [26]June 5, 2023 at 5:59 am
      This is awesome.
      [27]Reply
   4. Carlos says:
      [28]June 5, 2023 at 6:59 am
      Incredible work there, as always Jason. Thank you and Gaming
      Alexandria (and other groups interested in preserving print
      history)
      [29]Reply
   5. marianek says:
      [30]June 5, 2023 at 7:38 am
      What else to say, Thank You!
      Such magazines, frequently discarded initially, now are saving
      everyone who want to assemble computer from some specific time
      span. So that’s not only a “window” to the history.
      And, if the de-binding is done specific way, it can be re-bound.
      The heat-melting glue is the best thing here as pages can be
      re-glued back. The polivinyl glue requiring chemistry to
      disassemble is worse, but the re-binding will work when done like
      bookbinder does.
      [31]Reply
   6. [32]sound.and.vision says:
      [33]June 5, 2023 at 8:51 am
      great read, some useful tips here as someone who has a number of
      automotive and car magazines which can also be difficult to scan
      in. good luck with the project 😀
      [34]Reply
   7. [35]Dan Q says:
      [36]June 5, 2023 at 9:17 am
      Not all heroes wear capes.
      [37]Reply
         + phuzz says:
           [38]June 7, 2023 at 10:46 am
           Although Jason does strike me as the sort of person who would
           wear a cape.
           [39]Reply
   8. [40]Hanan Cohen says:
      [41]June 5, 2023 at 10:38 am
      I just purchased a scanner for my project and chose a smaller one
      than yours but from the same series – Fujitsu fi-8150. I chose it
      for it’s mechanics, not for it’s electronics. It “eats” EVERYTHING.
      From thin pages to conference badges. I have spent a few days with
      it and I am in love.
      [42]Reply
   9. [43]Digital Mark says:
      [44]June 5, 2023 at 2:22 pm
      I’ve been trawling the completed couple issues for articles I’m
      interested in, gonna be pulling out pages for subsets to upload
      later; mostly non-DOS/Windows compilers and such.
      It’s kind of hilarious that this, that we treated like disposable
      trash at the time, is such a useful historical record. Great
      project!
      [45]Reply
  10. Steve Stroh says:
      [46]June 5, 2023 at 3:21 pm
      One of the gems of CS was Stan Vein’s microcomputer history column,
      that was titled “Whatever Happened to… (insert name of company,
      product, etc.”. That was a great, informative read.
      [47]Reply
  11. Steve Stroh says:
      [48]June 5, 2023 at 3:25 pm
      I was mentioning this daunting project to my wife, especially the
      heat gun technique and she had heard of an alternate technique –
      freeze the magazine and the glue binding becomes brittle enough to
      pull the pages apart.
      Was glad to hear you’re using a sheet feeder instead of a flatbed –
      that will make it a little easier and more efficient.
      [49]Reply
  12. [50]Syeed Ali says:
      [51]June 5, 2023 at 3:39 pm
      Do also note the number of hours an issue takes, because some
      people calculate that into dollar value of your time.
      [52]Reply
  13. [53]Michael Clark says:
      [54]June 5, 2023 at 5:07 pm
      Wow, very cool. I need to dredge out from my memory when my BBS was
      active. It would be very cool to run some scripts on the rise and
      fall of BBSes based on the directory in those thousands of pages. A
      fun weekend project!
      [55]Reply
  14. Liam Busey says:
      [56]June 6, 2023 at 2:11 am
      What a treasure. I’m in awe. I have but 3 from the mid to early
      ’90s. They are a window into a time past.
      You do us all a great service in this.
      [57]Reply
  15. Ben Bradley says:
      [58]June 6, 2023 at 2:32 am
      I bought those every once in a while. The one thing I remember was
      an early-mid 80s issue that had an article (yes, in between all the
      pages of ads were a few articles!) on the latest Comdex or some
      such computer convention at which there was an influx of Asian
      PC-compatible components suppliers. One guy said to another “I bet
      I can buy the parts for a PC-XT including 20MB hard drive for under
      $1,000 [way under street price at the time] and it’ll work. After
      scrounging on the sales floor he had spent about $990, assembled
      it, powered it up and it worked.
      [59]Reply
  16. Isaac Eiland-Hall says:
      [60]June 6, 2023 at 3:21 am
      I don’t have anything truly intelligent to say except thank you.
      This is going to be an amazing resource. And a heck of a lot of
      work. I spent hours as a kid poring over these.
      [61]Reply
  17. Mark Sanders says:
      [62]June 6, 2023 at 4:05 am
      Absolutely astonishing! Somebody will study this repository for a
      PhD dissertation on something like the pricing volatility of
      computer printer ribbons correlated with OPEC energy production
      caps or something. Absolute gift to humanity.
      [63]Reply
  18. Shawn says:
      [64]June 6, 2023 at 4:18 am
      This is an amazing endeavor. I still have many of my computer
      shoppers, but tossed a bunch due to mouse damage. I would
      absolutely pay for access to an archive of old issues. In terms of
      the time for scanning, I haven’t thought this through carefully,
      but, I would say that I would be interested to understand if a
      sharp blade or jig could not be used to simply slice the binding
      clean off, maybe 0.25-0.375″ (6-8mm) from the edge. In this case,
      no more glue, no more binding, pages already in a stack, no
      waiting. There is, due to the binding, typically nothing on the
      inner 10-12mm of the pages anyway. Would that work at all?
      [65]Reply
  19. [66]bigger.bio says:
      [67]June 6, 2023 at 6:49 am
      There was so many PC magazines at that time but Computer Shopper
      made you feel if you didn’t buy it you were mising out on a deal.
      You got a good work out just carrying the thing home.
      [68]Reply
  20. Border Prepper says:
      [69]June 6, 2023 at 2:23 pm
      My eternal gratitude for your hard and excellent work. Rest assured
      that your effort is not wasted, and there are those of us who
      remember the magazine and the era fondly and will use your scans
      for nostalgia, for research and for educational purposes. How else
      are future generations going to know that this publication, nay –
      institution existed than if we preserve it for them? Good job, sir.
      Good job!
      [70]Reply
  21. jamison abbott says:
      [71]June 6, 2023 at 7:14 pm
      A (woodworking) bandsaw, with a fine-pitch (high count of teeth per
      inch/cm, like: 24TPI) blade is a MUCH faster way to de-bind bound
      items; in comparison to using a box cutter or similar to cut out
      2-3 pages at a time. The main downside is that even with a good
      blade, the cut edge is more-or less ragged. Possibly a ‘toothless’
      (rubber/foam cutting blade) installed on the same bandsaw would
      avoid that downside, but I haven’t tried it myself. A similar, but
      slower, and likely size-limited, possibility would be using a
      (stationary) scroll saw.
      [72]Reply
         + [73]geneb says:
           [74]June 7, 2023 at 7:05 pm
           The issue is the margins, or lack thereof. There’s commercial
           binding “shears” that will cleanly remove the spine of a
           paperback book or magazine, but when you’re dealing with the
           kinds of margin issues described here, you run the risk of
           slicing off actual content. That’s a problem.
           [75]Reply
  22. [76]Quag7 says:
      [77]June 6, 2023 at 9:19 pm
      I feel like I should say a prayer for you, Jason. In any case, I
      find Computer Shopper to be extremely important to computer history
      and am extremely grateful for the effort. Thank you so much for all
      you do.
      [78]Reply
  23. Bob Lindstrom says:
      [79]June 7, 2023 at 4:56 am
      I am absolutely gob-stopped by your dedication, Jason, and the fond
      memories that several of you have posted here. I was
      editor-in-chief of Computer Shopper 1989-1991 immediately following
      the reign of the late and much loved Stan Veit (who I had the
      delight of working with and calling a friend.) Scanning that many
      years of Shopper is an utterly Herculean task. During my tenure, I
      think the single largest issue we published was around 920 pp.! As
      I used to say, “We are not responsible for any physical injury you
      may incur while reading Computer Shopper.” And although the ads
      were predominent in the book, people often didn’t realize that 25%
      of those pages had to be editorial content to make the postal
      shipping rate. As a result, we had to produce A LOT of content each
      month: 200+ tabloid-sized pages worth. Stan got around this with
      features like the BBS listings. I had a larger budget to work with
      so I nixed the BBS (apologies to those who loved that feature) and
      increased reviews, columns, and added the product index. During
      that time, humble, “ugly” Shopper–almost every IT department’s
      bible–was the best-selling monthly computer magazine on the market.
      (PC Mag was published every fortnight so it didn’t qualify for that
      metric.) Anyway, thanks to all of you for remembering.
      [80]Reply
  24. Arby says:
      [81]June 7, 2023 at 2:09 pm
      Just thinking out loud about debinding. What about clamping the mag
      tightly between two sheets of plywood, like a press. Then run the
      binding edge over a planer set to remove a thin layer. A couple of
      passes and you will have removed the glue layer entirely.
      I found it fascinating to track the rise and fall of Gateway
      computers through their ads in CS. They set the standard for all
      others to follow. Each computer in its own box with its specs
      listed in bullet form.
      [82]Reply
  25. David says:
      [83]June 7, 2023 at 3:47 pm
      Offset printers used a constarch or talcum powder duster on output
      rollersto stop ink pickup.’ Addressograph/Multigraph or A. B Dick
      accessories might be found that could be adapted. Good luck, and
      thanks for doing this.
      [84]Reply
  26. Jeff says:
      [85]June 8, 2023 at 5:22 pm
      I thought old Computer Shoppers were lost to the ages. Thanks and
      good luck!
      [86]Reply
  27. Geoff says:
      [87]June 9, 2023 at 1:34 pm
      In the later years there was a column called “The Hard Edge” by a
      duo of writers named Alice and Bill. Bill operated what was called
      the “Lab of Doom and Pepsi Cola”, and it was a witty, sarcastic
      commentary on the industry back in the 1990s and early 2000s. It
      would be cool to create a web archive of those articles once
      they’ve been scanned. After the column was canceled circa 2004,
      Alice and Bill were going to go it alone online. Alas, their
      website is now 404.
      [88]Reply
  28. Ken Stuart says:
      [89]June 9, 2023 at 4:04 pm
      Curious… why not use a book scanner (such as the ones at
      [90]https://www.czur.com/) that allow scanning of open books (no
      need to unbind, automatically flatten text and images on curving
      pages), work via foot pedal, have good resolution, can be set at
      elevations that allow scanning of large-format publications?
      [91]Reply
         + [92]Jason Scott says:
           [93]June 9, 2023 at 6:00 pm
           Only some of those things are true for this purpose.
           [94]Reply
              o Ken Stuart says:
                [95]June 9, 2023 at 6:35 pm
                Hi Jason – I’ve used those scanners quite a bit and read
                your article. Which ones are not true? In my experience a
                book can be opened as far as it can be, and still have
                small text near the spine, which these scanners can
                extract. Also, some books I have scanned have been too
                big for the default height view of the scanner, so I have
                raised it by placing other books under it, so that its
                field of view is then large enough to grab the
                double-page spread in one image. The foot pedal control
                allows both hands to be used to hold pages open, if
                necessary, and plastic finger tabs are provided for that
                reason. The resolution of the native images has been
                sufficient for my needs. I’ve got no affiliation with the
                company but find their products work well, and I’ve used
                only low-end models, so would think that their higher-end
                ones would work well for your project at much lower cost
                than the flatbed and offer those other advantages.
                [96]Reply
                   # [97]Jason Scott says:
                     [98]June 9, 2023 at 6:39 pm
                     I will be happy to respond in more detail later
                     today after some things are done, but there is no
                     situation I was going to end up with me using a CZUR
                     scanner.
                     [99]Reply
                        @ [100]Jason Scott says:
                          [101]June 10, 2023 at 2:50 am
                          I have taken mercy and will not be responding
                          here. I’m doing it the way I am doing it.
  29. Rob F says:
      [102]June 9, 2023 at 9:01 pm
      This is crazy. I remember this magazine, but then remembered that
      I’m in the UK so how could that be. Turns out there was a UK
      version. So I guess that’s a whole other project!
      [103]Reply

Leave a Reply [104]Cancel reply

  IFRAME: [105]jetpack_remote_comment
    __________________________________________________________________

  Jason Scott's weblog of computer history, punditry and trivia, from the
      creator of the [106]BBS Documentary, [107]GET LAMP, and proprietor
      of the [108]textfiles.com family of sites. Available to chit-chat
      at [109][email protected].
  Search for: ____________________ Search

  [110][sjshot1.jpg] [111]Jason's Presentations [112]The BBS Documentary
                    [113]The Archive Team [114]GET LAMP

Recent Posts
         + [115]Preparing for the Incoming Computer Shopper Tsunami
         + [116]The Great Aboveground Empire
         + [117]Discord, or the Death of Lore
         + [118]The Grind a Day
         + [119]Priority and Process

Archives
         + [120]June 2023
         + [121]May 2023
         + [122]March 2023
         + [123]February 2023
         + [124]January 2023
         + [125]August 2020
         + [126]January 2018
         + [127]September 2017
         + [128]May 2017
         + [129]March 2017
         + [130]February 2017
         + [131]December 2016
         + [132]November 2016
         + [133]September 2016
         + [134]August 2016
         + [135]June 2016
         + [136]May 2016
         + [137]March 2016
         + [138]February 2016
         + [139]January 2016
         + [140]November 2015
         + [141]September 2015
         + [142]August 2015
         + [143]July 2015
         + [144]May 2015
         + [145]April 2015
         + [146]February 2015
         + [147]January 2015
         + [148]December 2014
         + [149]November 2014
         + [150]October 2014
         + [151]September 2014
         + [152]August 2014
         + [153]July 2014
         + [154]June 2014
         + [155]May 2014
         + [156]April 2014
         + [157]January 2014
         + [158]December 2013
         + [159]November 2013
         + [160]October 2013
         + [161]September 2013
         + [162]August 2013
         + [163]July 2013
         + [164]May 2013
         + [165]April 2013
         + [166]March 2013
         + [167]January 2013
         + [168]December 2012
         + [169]November 2012
         + [170]October 2012
         + [171]September 2012
         + [172]July 2012
         + [173]June 2012
         + [174]May 2012
         + [175]April 2012
         + [176]March 2012
         + [177]January 2012
         + [178]December 2011
         + [179]November 2011
         + [180]October 2011
         + [181]September 2011
         + [182]August 2011
         + [183]July 2011
         + [184]June 2011
         + [185]May 2011
         + [186]April 2011
         + [187]March 2011
         + [188]February 2011
         + [189]January 2011
         + [190]December 2010
         + [191]November 2010
         + [192]October 2010
         + [193]September 2010
         + [194]August 2010
         + [195]July 2010
         + [196]May 2010
         + [197]April 2010
         + [198]February 2010
         + [199]January 2010
         + [200]December 2009
         + [201]November 2009
         + [202]October 2009
         + [203]September 2009
         + [204]August 2009
         + [205]July 2009
         + [206]June 2009
         + [207]May 2009
         + [208]April 2009
         + [209]March 2009
         + [210]February 2009
         + [211]January 2009
         + [212]December 2008
         + [213]November 2008
         + [214]October 2008
         + [215]September 2008
         + [216]August 2008
         + [217]July 2008
         + [218]June 2008
         + [219]May 2008
         + [220]April 2008
         + [221]March 2008
         + [222]February 2008
         + [223]January 2008
         + [224]December 2007
         + [225]November 2007
         + [226]October 2007
         + [227]September 2007
         + [228]August 2007
         + [229]July 2007
         + [230]June 2007
         + [231]May 2007
         + [232]April 2007
         + [233]March 2007
         + [234]February 2007
         + [235]January 2007
         + [236]December 2006
         + [237]November 2006
         + [238]October 2006
         + [239]September 2006
         + [240]August 2006
         + [241]July 2006
         + [242]June 2006
         + [243]May 2006
         + [244]April 2006
         + [245]March 2006
         + [246]February 2006
         + [247]January 2006
         + [248]December 2005
         + [249]November 2005
         + [250]October 2005
         + [251]September 2005
         + [252]August 2005
         + [253]July 2005
         + [254]June 2005
         + [255]May 2005
         + [256]April 2005
         + [257]March 2005
         + [258]February 2005
         + [259]January 2005
         + [260]December 2004
         + [261]November 2004
         + [262]October 2004
         + [263]September 2004
         + [264]August 2004
         + [265]July 2004
         + [266]June 2004
         + [267]May 2004
         + [268]April 2004
         + [269]March 2004
         + [270]February 2004
         + [271]January 2004
         + [272]December 2003
         + [273]November 2003
         + [274]October 2003
         + [275]May 2000

  © 2023 ASCII by Jason Scott | powered by [276]WordPress
  [277]Entries (RSS) and [278]Comments (RSS).


  Loading Comments...

  Write a Comment...
  ____________________________________________________________
  ____________________________________________________________
  ____________________________________________________________
  ____________________________________________________________

  Email (Required) ____________________

  Name (Required) ____________________

  Website ____________________

  Post Comment

References

  Visible links
  1. http://ascii.textfiles.com/feed
  2. http://ascii.textfiles.com/comments/feed
  3. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543/feed
  4. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/5543
  5. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed?url=http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543
  6. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed?url=http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543&format=xml
  7. http://ascii.textfiles.com/
  8. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1835
  9. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/2672
 10. https://www.retromags.com/guides/debinding/
 11. https://www.gamingalexandria.com/wp/
 12. https://archive.org/details/computer-shopper-february-1986
 13. https://www.patreon.com/textfiles
 14. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543
 15. mailto:?subject=[Shared Post] Preparing for the Incoming Computer Shopper Tsunami&body=http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543&share=email
 16. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?share=facebook
 17. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?share=reddit
 18. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?share=twitter
 19. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/category/uncategorized
 20. http://www.evilbadman.com/
 21. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583607
 22. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583607#respond
 23. https://www.trevoedwards.com/
 24. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583608
 25. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583608#respond
 26. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583610
 27. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583610#respond
 28. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583611
 29. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583611#respond
 30. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583612
 31. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583612#respond
 32. http://computer-legacy.com/
 33. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583613
 34. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583613#respond
 35. https://danq.me/
 36. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583614
 37. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583614#respond
 38. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583637
 39. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583637#respond
 40. https://archive.org/details/@hananc
 41. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583616
 42. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583616#respond
 43. https://appdot.net/@mdhughes
 44. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583619
 45. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583619#respond
 46. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583620
 47. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583620#respond
 48. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583621
 49. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583621#respond
 50. http://syeedali.com/
 51. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583622
 52. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583622#respond
 53. http://planetmike.wordpress.com/
 54. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583623
 55. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583623#respond
 56. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583624
 57. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583624#respond
 58. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583625
 59. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583625#respond
 60. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583627
 61. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583627#respond
 62. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583628
 63. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583628#respond
 64. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583629
 65. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583629#respond
 66. https://bigger.bio/
 67. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583630
 68. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583630#respond
 69. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583631
 70. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583631#respond
 71. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583634
 72. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583634#respond
 73. https://www.f15sim.com/
 74. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583642
 75. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583642#respond
 76. https://frostwarning.com/
 77. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583635
 78. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583635#respond
 79. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583636
 80. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583636#respond
 81. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583638
 82. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583638#respond
 83. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583639
 84. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583639#respond
 85. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583643
 86. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583643#respond
 87. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583644
 88. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583644#respond
 89. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583645
 90. https://www.czur.com/
 91. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583645#respond
 92. http://ascii.textfiles.com/
 93. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583646
 94. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583646#respond
 95. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583647
 96. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583647#respond
 97. http://ascii.textfiles.com/
 98. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583648
 99. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583648#respond
100. http://ascii.textfiles.com/
101. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583650
102. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#comment-583649
103. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543?replytocom=583649#respond
104. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543#respond
105. https://jetpack.wordpress.com/jetpack-comment/?blogid=5825197&postid=5543&comment_registration=0&require_name_email=1&stc_enabled=1&stb_enabled=1&show_avatars=1&avatar_default=mystery&greeting=Leave+a+Reply&jetpack_comments_nonce=6d1d3b5bbb&greeting_reply=Leave+a+Reply+to+%s&color_scheme=light&lang=en_US&jetpack_version=12.2&show_cookie_consent=10&has_cookie_consent=0&token_key=;normal;&sig=7d2d7abe33fb00c553c8cedcd22a24c9180cf578#parent=http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543
106. http://www.bbsdocumentary.com/
107. http://www.getlamp.com/
108. http://www.textfiles.com/
109. mailto:[email protected]
110. http://ascii.textfiles.com/about
111. http://ascii.textfiles.com/speaking
112. http://www.bbsdocumentary.com/
113. http://www.archiveteam.org/
114. http://www.getlamp.com/
115. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543
116. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5528
117. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5509
118. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5498
119. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5483
120. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2023/06
121. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2023/05
122. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2023/03
123. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2023/02
124. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2023/01
125. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2020/08
126. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2018/01
127. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2017/09
128. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2017/05
129. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2017/03
130. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2017/02
131. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2016/12
132. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2016/11
133. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2016/09
134. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2016/08
135. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2016/06
136. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2016/05
137. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2016/03
138. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2016/02
139. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2016/01
140. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2015/11
141. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2015/09
142. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2015/08
143. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2015/07
144. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2015/05
145. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2015/04
146. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2015/02
147. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2015/01
148. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2014/12
149. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2014/11
150. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2014/10
151. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2014/09
152. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2014/08
153. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2014/07
154. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2014/06
155. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2014/05
156. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2014/04
157. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2014/01
158. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2013/12
159. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2013/11
160. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2013/10
161. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2013/09
162. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2013/08
163. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2013/07
164. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2013/05
165. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2013/04
166. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2013/03
167. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2013/01
168. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2012/12
169. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2012/11
170. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2012/10
171. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2012/09
172. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2012/07
173. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2012/06
174. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2012/05
175. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2012/04
176. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2012/03
177. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2012/01
178. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2011/12
179. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2011/11
180. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2011/10
181. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2011/09
182. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2011/08
183. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2011/07
184. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2011/06
185. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2011/05
186. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2011/04
187. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2011/03
188. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2011/02
189. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2011/01
190. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2010/12
191. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2010/11
192. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2010/10
193. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2010/09
194. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2010/08
195. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2010/07
196. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2010/05
197. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2010/04
198. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2010/02
199. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2010/01
200. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2009/12
201. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2009/11
202. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2009/10
203. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2009/09
204. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2009/08
205. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2009/07
206. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2009/06
207. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2009/05
208. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2009/04
209. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2009/03
210. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2009/02
211. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2009/01
212. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2008/12
213. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2008/11
214. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2008/10
215. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2008/09
216. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2008/08
217. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2008/07
218. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2008/06
219. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2008/05
220. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2008/04
221. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2008/03
222. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2008/02
223. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2008/01
224. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2007/12
225. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2007/11
226. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2007/10
227. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2007/09
228. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2007/08
229. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2007/07
230. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2007/06
231. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2007/05
232. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2007/04
233. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2007/03
234. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2007/02
235. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2007/01
236. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2006/12
237. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2006/11
238. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2006/10
239. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2006/09
240. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2006/08
241. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2006/07
242. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2006/06
243. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2006/05
244. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2006/04
245. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2006/03
246. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2006/02
247. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2006/01
248. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2005/12
249. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2005/11
250. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2005/10
251. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2005/09
252. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2005/08
253. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2005/07
254. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2005/06
255. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2005/05
256. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2005/04
257. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2005/03
258. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2005/02
259. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2005/01
260. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2004/12
261. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2004/11
262. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2004/10
263. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2004/09
264. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2004/08
265. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2004/07
266. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2004/06
267. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2004/05
268. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2004/04
269. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2004/03
270. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2004/02
271. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2004/01
272. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2003/12
273. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2003/11
274. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2003/10
275. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/date/2000/05
276. http://wordpress.org/
277. http://ascii.textfiles.com/feed
278. http://ascii.textfiles.com/comments/feed

  Hidden links:
280. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/3344549422_d8139b83bc_k.jpg
281. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/3343713557_8c06e34719_k.jpg
282. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/3343711433_2dff897c89_k.jpg
283. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/s-l1600-6.jpg
284. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20230404_114538-scaled.jpg
285. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/ebay.png
286. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20230405_111156-scaled.jpg
287. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20230405_184249-scaled.jpg
288. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/signal-2023-06-03-014223_002.jpeg
289. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/signal-2023-06-03-014221_002.jpeg
290. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/ecc7b373b76594c8.png
291. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/choices.png
292. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Computer_Shopper_February_1986_Readable_0018.jpg
293. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Computer-Shopper_February_1986_Aesthetic_0018.jpg
294. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/s-l1600-3.jpg
295. http://ascii.textfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/3344545122_707f8df2d5_k.jpg
296. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543
297. http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/5543