#[1]Locus Online » Feed [2]Locus Online » Comments Feed [3]Locus Online
  » Cory Doctorow: Science Fiction is a Luddite Literature Comments Feed
  [4]alternate [5]alternate [6]alternate

  [7][USEMAP:locus-header-align-left6rainbow-version4.jpg]
  [8]Locus Online

[9]Locus Online

  The Magazine of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Field

  [10]Subscribe!

    * [11]All Posts
    * [12]News
         + [13]Awards
         + [14]Announcements
         + [15]Publishing
         + [16]New Titles & Bestsellers
         + [17]Conventions
         + [18]Obituaries
    * [19]Reviews
         + [20]Books
         + [21]Short Fiction
         + [22]Films
         + [23]Index to Reviews
    * [24]Features
         + [25]Interviews
              o [26]Index to Interviews
         + [27]Spotlights
         + [28]Commentary
              o [29]Cory Doctorow
              o [30]Kameron Hurley
              o [31]Roundtable
              o [32]SF Crossing the Gulf
    * [33]Subscribe
    * [34]Advertise
    * [35]Donate
    * [36]About
         + [37]Submission Guidelines
         + [38]Contact Us
         + [39]Staff
         + [40]History of Locus Magazine
              o [41]Charles N. Brown (1937-2009)
              o [42]Locus Online
         + [43]FAQ
         + [44]Code of Conduct
         + [45]Store
    * [46]Resources
         + [47]Forthcoming Books
         + [48]Index to Interviews
         + [49]Index to Reviews
         + [50]Directories
         + [51]Science Fiction Awards Database
         + [52]Conventions List
         + [53]Links by Category
         + [54]Store
    * [55]My Account

  ____________________ (BUTTON)

  [56]Commentary [57]Cory Doctorow [58]Features [59]Slider

Cory Doctorow: Science Fiction is a Luddite Literature

  [60]January 3, 2022December 29, 2021 [61]locusmag [62]0 Comments
  [63]Cory Doctorow
  Headshot of Cory Doctorow outdoors Photo by Paula Mariel Salischiker

  From 1811-1816, a secret society styling themselves “the Luddites”
  smashed textile machinery in the mills of England. Today, we use
  “Luddite” as a pejorative referring to backwards, anti-technology
  reactionaries.

  This proves that history really is written by the winners.

  In truth, the Luddites’ cause wasn’t the destruction of technology – no
  more than the Boston Tea Party’s cause was the elimination of tea, or
  Al Qaeda’s cause was the end of civilian aviation. Smashing looms and
  stocking frames was the Luddites’ tactic, not their goal.

  In truth, their goal was something closely related to science fiction:
  to challenge not the technology itself, but rather the social relations
  that governed its use.

  The critique of Luddism as anti-technology is as shallow a reading of
  the Luddites as the critique of science fiction as nothing more than
  speculation about the design of gadgets of varying degrees of
  plausibility.

  In truth, Luddism and science fiction concern themselves with the same
  questions: not merely what the technology does, but who it does it for
  and who it does it to.

  The Luddites were textile workers – skilled tradespeople who enjoyed
  comfortable lifestyles because they commanded a hefty portion of the
  money generated by the product of their labor. What’s more, it took a
  lot of labor to weave fabric, and as a result, cloth was incredibly
  expensive, as were clothes, naturally.

  The advent of textile automation upended everything. It didn’t just
  reduce the amount of labor that went into a yard of cloth – it also
  created unprecedented demand for wool (leading to the mass eviction of
  the tenant farmers to make way for sheep) and cotton (supercharging
  global slavery).

  Textile automation also produced a lot of textiles (obviously). These
  were cheaper and often finer than the textiles they replaced, and
  transformed ready access to clothing of all sorts from a luxury for
  elites into something working people came to expect.

  You really couldn’t ask for a more science-fictional setup: someone
  invents a couple of gadgets and everything changes. A whole industry of
  skilled workers is threatened. Ancient settlements are razed and
  replaced by sheep, their residents turned into internal refugees,
  wandering the land. Slavers sail around the world, murdering and
  enslaving distant strangers to feed the machine. The entire material
  culture of a nation is transformed. Guerilla warfare breaks out.
  Machines are smashed. Factories are put to the torch. Guerrillas are
  captured and publicly executed. Blood runs through the streets.

  The Luddites weren’t exercised about automation. They didn’t mind the
  proliferation of cheap textiles. History is mostly silent on whether
  they gave thought to the plight of tenant farmers at home or enslaved
  people abroad.

  What were they fighting about? The social relations governing the use
  of the new machines. These new machines could have allowed the existing
  workforce to produce far more cloth, in far fewer hours, at a much
  lower price, while still paying these workers well (the lower per-unit
  cost of finished cloth would be offset by the higher sales volume, and
  that volume could be produced in fewer hours).

  Instead, the owners of the factories – whose fortunes had been built on
  the labor of textile workers – chose to employ fewer workers, working
  the same long hours as before, at a lower rate than before, and
  pocketed the substantial savings.

  There is nothing natural about this arrangement. A Martian watching the
  Industrial Revolution unfold through the eyepiece of a powerful
  telescope could not tell you why the dividends from these machines
  should favor factory owners, rather than factory workers.

  The Luddites did what every science fiction writer does: they took a
  technology and imagined all the different ways it could be used – who
  it could be used for and whom it could be used against. They demanded
  the creation of a parallel universe in which the left fork was taken,
  rather than the right.

  That is many things, but it is not technophobic. Using “Luddite” as a
  synonym for technophobe is an historically insupportable libel.

  We’re living in quite a Luddite moment, as it happens. Many of us are
  contesting the social relations surrounding our technologies: should we
  continue to subsidize big agriculture? Should our cities continue to be
  organized around cars? Should tech giants be permitted to continue to
  gobble up each other and their small competitors, reducing the internet
  to “five giant websites, each filled with screenshots of the other
  four?” (to quote Tom Eastman).

  Some of that contestation is taking place in the streets, some at the
  ballot-box, some in boardrooms; some is happening at high-level
  meetings like COP26 in Glasgow. To mangle William Gibson’s rallying
  cry, the street is desperately asserting its right to find its own use
  for things.

  Luddism is the key to resolving the tension in some of our most
  important labor and technology debates. For example, labor economists
  have long decried automation as “de-skilling” – a way to decompose
  skilled labor into a series of easy tasks, which weakens the bargaining
  position of workers by allowing employers to replace them more easily.

  But automation isn’t solely disempowering: it also lifts people up.
  Today, thanks to automated machining tools like CNC mills, someone with
  very little training can do a lot of fine machining for themselves,
  without having to bother a skilled machinist. Democratizing access to
  the means of production isn’t intrinsically anti-labor – it’s only bad
  for workers when the bounty of automation is disproportionally
  allocated to a small number of capital owners, and not workers.

  The history of science fiction is rife with stories of people who seize
  the means of production. The classical “problem story” – in which an
  engineer has to figure out how to repurpose some machine or system to
  make it work in ways its creator never intended – is, at root, a story
  about technological self-determination. It’s a story that says that the
  person who uses the machine matters more than the person who designed
  it or bought it.

  You don’t have to go turn to cyberpunk to find this ethic: when a
  Heinlein character like Kip Russell uses duct-tape and ingenuity to
  save his friend’s life on the lunar surface in Have Spacesuit, Will
  Travel, he’s unilaterally remapping the social relations of the
  technology he depends on, as a matter of life and death. Kip Russell is
  a Luddite, convinced that his own welfare is more important than the
  intentions and choices of the company that made his spacesuit.

  The difference between de-skilling and democratizing isn’t what the
  gadget does – it’s who it does it for and who it does it to. Imagining
  new ways of arranging those factors is profoundly science fictional.

  The Luddites weren’t merely science fictional, either. They took their
  name from King Ludd, or Captain (or General!) Ludd, a mythological
  titan who supposedly led their shadow army. The Luddites spun tall
  tales about this leader and signed his name to letters to the
  newspapers and to factory owners. King Ludd was a creature out of
  fantasy – an imaginary giant who was often depicted as towering over
  the factories that were the object of the Luddites’ rage.

  A secret society bent on remaking the social relations for technology,
  who claimed to be led by a mythological giant? That’s fannish as hell,
  a Golden Age fantasy/SF crossover worthy of an Ace Double.
    __________________________________________________________________

  Cory Doctorow is the author of Walkaway, Little Brother, and
  Information Doesn’t Want to Be Free (among many others); he is the
  co-owner of Boing Boing, a special consultant to the Electronic
  Frontier Foundation, a visiting professor of Computer Science at the
  Open University and an MIT Media Lab Research Affiliate.
    __________________________________________________________________

  All opinions expressed by commentators are solely their own and do not
  reflect the opinions of Locus.

  This article and more like it in the [64]January 2022 issue of Locus.

  [65]Locus Magazine, Science Fiction Fantasy While you are here, please
  take a moment to support Locus with a one-time or recurring donation.
  We rely on reader donations to keep the magazine and site going, and
  would like to keep the site paywall free, but WE NEED YOUR FINANCIAL
  SUPPORT to continue quality coverage of the science fiction and fantasy
  field.

  ©Locus Magazine. Copyrighted material may not be republished without
  permission of LSFF.
    * [66]Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    * [67]Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
    * [68]Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
    * [69]Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    *

    * [70]← Previous 2022 WSFA Small Press Award Open
    * [71]T.G Shenoy reviews The Year’s Best African Speculative Fiction
      by Oghenechovwe Donald Ekpeki Next →

Earlier Posts of Interest...

[72]Phenderson Djèlí Clark: Wonderful Things to Behold

  [73]October 28, 2019 [74]locusmag [75]0

[76]Ursula K. Le Guin (1929-2018)

  [77]January 23, 2018 [78]locusmag [79]5

[80]Spotlight on David Moles

  [81]July 28, 2010 [82]admin [83]1

Leave a Reply [84]Cancel reply

  Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  Comment
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________

  Name * ______________________________

  Email * ______________________________

  Website ______________________________

  [ ] Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

  Post Comment

  Δ
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________
  _____________________________________________

  [85]Issue 732 Table of Contents, January 2022
  [86]Issues

[87]Issue 732 Table of Contents, January 2022

  [88]January 1, 2022 [89]locusmag [90]0

  [91](BUTTON) Buy Current Issue: Print & Digital [92](BUTTON) See All
  Issues

Latest Posts

  [93]Weekly Bestsellers, 10 January 2022
  [94]Bestsellers [95]New Titles & Bestsellers

[96]Weekly Bestsellers, 10 January 2022

  [97]January 10, 2022 [98]LocEditor [99]0
  [100]Simon Jimenez: Resonance
  [101]Features [102]Interviews [103]Slider

[104]Simon Jimenez: Resonance

  [105]January 10, 2022 [106]locusmag [107]0
  [108]Maya C. James reviews <b>After the Dragons</b> by Cynthia Zhang
  [109]Books [110]Reviews

[111]Maya C. James reviews After the Dragons by Cynthia Zhang

  [112]January 10, 2022 [113]locusmag [114]0
  [115]Publisher Reopenings Pushed Back
  [116]News [117]Publishing

[118]Publisher Reopenings Pushed Back

  [119]January 9, 2022 [120]locusmag [121]0
  [122]Fantastika Report
  [123]Conventions [124]News

[125]Fantastika Report

  [126]January 9, 2022 [127]locusmag [128]0

  [129]Black Lives Matter

  [130]Locus Merchandise

Categories

  [131]Announcements [132]Archives [133]Awards [134]Bestsellers
  [135]Blinks [136]Blurb [137]Books [138]Bookstores [139]Classic Reprints
  [140]Commentary [141]Contests [142]Conventions [143]Cory Doctorow
  [144]Features [145]Films [146]Forthcoming Books [147]Interviews
  [148]Issues [149]Kameron Hurley [150]Legal [151]Milestones [152]New &
  Notable [153]New Books [154]New in Paperback [155]News [156]New Titles
  & Bestsellers [157]Obituaries [158]Periodicals [159]Publishing
  [160]Reviewers [161]Reviews [162]Roundtable [163]Short Fiction
  [164]Slider [165]Spotlight [166]Staff [167]Staff Picks
  [168]Uncategorized [169]Workshops

  [INS: :INS]

What they say

  [170]Blurb

[171]Charlie Jane Anders on Locus

  [172]March 7, 2010 [173]locusmag [174]0

  “The only print publication I subscribe to is Locus Magazine. It’s
  indispensable for keeping up with SF. Plus mind-expanding
  criticism/interviews!”
    * [175]Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    * [176]Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
    * [177]Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
    * [178]Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    *

  [INS: :INS]

  [INS: :INS]

Archives

  Archives [Select Month_________]

Categories

  Categories[Select Category__________________]

  All opinions expressed
  by commentators, guest bloggers, reviewers, and interviewees are solely
  their own and do not reflect the opinions of Locus magazine or its
  staff.

Contact

  Locus SF Foundation
  dba Locus Publications
  655 13th St. #100
  Oakland CA 94612
  ph. +1-510-339-9196
  [179][email protected]
  Weekdays: 9-5 Pacific Time

Suggestion, tips, typos?

  You can send news, tips, and suggestions to [180][email protected].
  If you see problems or bugs on the site, please let us know and include
  the URL and also which browser you are using.

Follow us!

           [181][birdie.gif] [182][2000px-Facebook_icon.svg.png]
             [183][Patreon_logo.svg.png] [184][instagram.png]

  Locus Magazine and Website cover science fiction, fantasy, young-adult,
  horror books, short fiction, anthologies, magazines, films, news,
  conventions, and international. Also interviews with SFF authors,
  editors, artists, and more.

  Copyright © 2022 Locus Publications. All rights reserved.

  [185]donate now button

PLEASE SUPPORT LOCUS WITH A DONATION TODAY!

  Locus is a 501(c)(3) non-profit and relies on donations and subscribers
  to stay alive. Now losing some of our last bookstores to the trials of
  2020, Locus needs your support even more to keep publishing the high
  quality reviews, book and community news, and articles you read here.
  Our online readers (there are a lot of you!) could support everything
  Locus does, if each reader donated $5 once a year. But only 1% of our
  audience pitches in. Please consider making your donation today!


  (BUTTON) CLOSE

References

  Visible links
  1. https://locusmag.com/feed/
  2. https://locusmag.com/comments/feed/
  3. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/feed/
  4. https://locusmag.com/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/128205
  5. https://locusmag.com/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed?url=https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/
  6. https://locusmag.com/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed?url=https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/&format=xml
  7. LYNXIMGMAP:https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/#image-map
  8. https://locusmag.com/
  9. https://locusmag.com/
 10. http://locusmag.com/subscribe/
 11. https://locusmag.com/recent-posts/
 12. https://locusmag.com/category/news/
 13. https://locusmag.com/category/news/awards/
 14. https://locusmag.com/category/news/announcements/
 15. https://locusmag.com/category/news/publishing/
 16. https://locusmag.com/category/newtitlesbestsellers/
 17. https://locusmag.com/category/news/conventions/
 18. https://locusmag.com/category/news/obituaries/
 19. https://locusmag.com/category/reviews/
 20. https://locusmag.com/category/reviews/books/
 21. https://locusmag.com/category/reviews/short-fiction/
 22. https://locusmag.com/category/films/
 23. https://locusmag.com/reviews/
 24. https://locusmag.com/category/features/
 25. https://locusmag.com/category/features/interviews/
 26. https://locusmag.com/interviews/
 27. https://locusmag.com/category/features/spotlight/
 28. https://locusmag.com/category/features/commentary/
 29. https://locusmag.com/category/features/commentary/cory-doctorow/
 30. https://locusmag.com/category/features/commentary/kameron-hurley/
 31. https://locusmag.com/category/features/commentary/roundtable/
 32. https://locusmag.com/sf-crossing-the-gulf/
 33. https://locusmag.com/subscribe/
 34. https://locusmag.com/advertise/
 35. https://locusmag.com/donate/
 36. https://locusmag.com/aboutlocusonline/
 37. https://locusmag.com/aboutlocusonline/submission-guidelines/
 38. https://locusmag.com/aboutlocusonline/contact/
 39. https://locusmag.com/category/staff/
 40. https://locusmag.com/our-history/
 41. https://locusmag.com/aboutlocusonline/charles-n-brown-1937-2009/
 42. https://locusmag.com/aboutlocusonline/locus-online/
 43. https://locusmag.com/aboutlocusonline/faq/
 44. https://locusmag.com/aboutlocusonline/code-of-conduct/
 45. https://subscribers.locusmag.com/store
 46. https://locusmag.com/resources/
 47. https://locusmag.com/forthcomingbooks/
 48. https://locusmag.com/interviews/
 49. https://locusmag.com/reviews/
 50. http://locusmag.com/2019-directory/
 51. http://www.sfadb.com/
 52. https://locusmag.com/conventions/
 53. https://locusmag.com/links/
 54. https://subscribers.locusmag.com/store
 55. https://subscribers.locusmag.com/
 56. https://locusmag.com/category/features/commentary/
 57. https://locusmag.com/category/features/commentary/cory-doctorow/
 58. https://locusmag.com/category/features/
 59. https://locusmag.com/category/slider/
 60. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/
 61. https://locusmag.com/author/locusmag/
 62. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/#respond
 63. https://locusmag.com/tag/cory-doctorow/
 64. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/issue-732-table-of-contents-january-2022/
 65. https://locusmag.com/donate/
 66. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/?share=facebook
 67. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/?share=twitter
 68. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/?share=tumblr
 69. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/?share=pinterest
 70. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/2022-wsfa-small-press-award-open/
 71. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/t-g-shenoy-reviews-the-years-best-african-speculative-fiction-by-oghenechovwe-donald-ekpeki/
 72. https://locusmag.com/2019/10/phenderson-djeli-clark-wonderful-things-to-behold/
 73. https://locusmag.com/2019/10/phenderson-djeli-clark-wonderful-things-to-behold/
 74. https://locusmag.com/author/locusmag/
 75. https://locusmag.com/2019/10/phenderson-djeli-clark-wonderful-things-to-behold/#respond
 76. https://locusmag.com/2018/01/ursula-k-le-guin-1929-2018/
 77. https://locusmag.com/2018/01/ursula-k-le-guin-1929-2018/
 78. https://locusmag.com/author/locusmag/
 79. https://locusmag.com/2018/01/ursula-k-le-guin-1929-2018/#comments
 80. https://locusmag.com/2010/07/spotlight-on-david-moles/
 81. https://locusmag.com/2010/07/spotlight-on-david-moles/
 82. https://locusmag.com/author/admin/
 83. https://locusmag.com/2010/07/spotlight-on-david-moles/#comments
 84. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/#respond
 85. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/issue-732-table-of-contents-january-2022/
 86. https://locusmag.com/category/issues/
 87. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/issue-732-table-of-contents-january-2022/
 88. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/issue-732-table-of-contents-january-2022/
 89. https://locusmag.com/author/locusmag/
 90. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/issue-732-table-of-contents-january-2022/#respond
 91. https://subscribers.locusmag.com/content/buy-august-2021
 92. https://subscribers.locusmag.com/back-issues
 93. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/weekly-bestsellers-10-january-2022/
 94. https://locusmag.com/category/newtitlesbestsellers/bestsellers/
 95. https://locusmag.com/category/newtitlesbestsellers/
 96. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/weekly-bestsellers-10-january-2022/
 97. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/weekly-bestsellers-10-january-2022/
 98. https://locusmag.com/author/loceditor/
 99. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/weekly-bestsellers-10-january-2022/#respond
100. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/simon-jimenez-resonance/
101. https://locusmag.com/category/features/
102. https://locusmag.com/category/features/interviews/
103. https://locusmag.com/category/slider/
104. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/simon-jimenez-resonance/
105. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/simon-jimenez-resonance/
106. https://locusmag.com/author/locusmag/
107. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/simon-jimenez-resonance/#respond
108. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/maya-c-james-reviews-after-the-dragons-by-cynthia-zhang/
109. https://locusmag.com/category/reviews/books/
110. https://locusmag.com/category/reviews/
111. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/maya-c-james-reviews-after-the-dragons-by-cynthia-zhang/
112. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/maya-c-james-reviews-after-the-dragons-by-cynthia-zhang/
113. https://locusmag.com/author/locusmag/
114. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/maya-c-james-reviews-after-the-dragons-by-cynthia-zhang/#respond
115. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/publisher-reopenings-pushed-back/
116. https://locusmag.com/category/news/
117. https://locusmag.com/category/news/publishing/
118. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/publisher-reopenings-pushed-back/
119. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/publisher-reopenings-pushed-back/
120. https://locusmag.com/author/locusmag/
121. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/publisher-reopenings-pushed-back/#respond
122. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/fantastika-report/
123. https://locusmag.com/category/news/conventions/
124. https://locusmag.com/category/news/
125. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/fantastika-report/
126. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/fantastika-report/
127. https://locusmag.com/author/locusmag/
128. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/fantastika-report/#respond
129. https://locusmag.com/black-lives-matter/
130. https://subscribers.locusmag.com/store
131. https://locusmag.com/category/news/announcements/
132. https://locusmag.com/category/archives/
133. https://locusmag.com/category/news/awards/
134. https://locusmag.com/category/newtitlesbestsellers/bestsellers/
135. https://locusmag.com/category/blinks/
136. https://locusmag.com/category/blurb/
137. https://locusmag.com/category/reviews/books/
138. https://locusmag.com/category/news/bookstores/
139. https://locusmag.com/category/newtitlesbestsellers/classic-reprints/
140. https://locusmag.com/category/features/commentary/
141. https://locusmag.com/category/news/contests/
142. https://locusmag.com/category/news/conventions/
143. https://locusmag.com/category/features/commentary/cory-doctorow/
144. https://locusmag.com/category/features/
145. https://locusmag.com/category/films/
146. https://locusmag.com/category/newtitlesbestsellers/forthcoming-books/
147. https://locusmag.com/category/features/interviews/
148. https://locusmag.com/category/issues/
149. https://locusmag.com/category/features/commentary/kameron-hurley/
150. https://locusmag.com/category/news/legal-2/
151. https://locusmag.com/category/news/milestones/
152. https://locusmag.com/category/newtitlesbestsellers/new-and-notable/
153. https://locusmag.com/category/newtitlesbestsellers/new-books/
154. https://locusmag.com/category/newtitlesbestsellers/new-in-paperback/
155. https://locusmag.com/category/news/
156. https://locusmag.com/category/newtitlesbestsellers/
157. https://locusmag.com/category/news/obituaries/
158. https://locusmag.com/category/newtitlesbestsellers/periodicals/
159. https://locusmag.com/category/news/publishing/
160. https://locusmag.com/category/staff/reviewers/
161. https://locusmag.com/category/reviews/
162. https://locusmag.com/category/features/commentary/roundtable/
163. https://locusmag.com/category/reviews/short-fiction/
164. https://locusmag.com/category/slider/
165. https://locusmag.com/category/features/spotlight/
166. https://locusmag.com/category/staff/
167. https://locusmag.com/category/staff-picks/
168. https://locusmag.com/category/uncategorized/
169. https://locusmag.com/category/news/workshops/
170. https://locusmag.com/category/blurb/
171. https://locusmag.com/2010/03/charlie-jane-anders-on-locus/
172. https://locusmag.com/2010/03/charlie-jane-anders-on-locus/
173. https://locusmag.com/author/locusmag/
174. https://locusmag.com/2010/03/charlie-jane-anders-on-locus/#respond
175. https://locusmag.com/2010/03/charlie-jane-anders-on-locus/?share=facebook
176. https://locusmag.com/2010/03/charlie-jane-anders-on-locus/?share=twitter
177. https://locusmag.com/2010/03/charlie-jane-anders-on-locus/?share=tumblr
178. https://locusmag.com/2010/03/charlie-jane-anders-on-locus/?share=pinterest
179. mailto:[email protected]
180. mailto:[email protected]
181. http://twitter.com/locusmag
182. https://www.facebook.com/Locus-Magazine-547211638785273/
183. http://www.patreon.com/locus
184. https://www.instagram.com/locusmagazine/
185. http://locusmag.com/donate/

  Hidden links:
187. http://locusmag.com/subscribe/
188. https://locusmag.com/
189. https://locusmag.com/2019/10/phenderson-djeli-clark-wonderful-things-to-behold/
190. https://locusmag.com/2018/01/ursula-k-le-guin-1929-2018/
191. https://locusmag.com/2010/07/spotlight-on-david-moles/
192. https://www.gsblaw.com/
193. https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/#masthead

[USEMAP]
https://locusmag.com/2022/01/cory-doctorow-science-fiction-is-a-luddite-literature/#image-map
  1. https://locusmag.com/
  2. https://locusmag.com/subscribe/
  3. https://locusmag.com/donate/