IFRAME: [1]https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-PL33XX4

  [2]Skip to main content

  [3](BUTTON) Subscribe[4] (BUTTON) Latest Issues (BUTTON) Menu
  [5]Scientific American
    * [6]Cart 0
    * (BUTTON) Sign In (BUTTON) Email *: ____________________Password *:
      ____________________[7]Forgot password? (BUTTON) Login Loading
      [8]Not yet registered?
    * |[9]Stay Informed

  (BUTTON) Search[10] (BUTTON) Subscribe
  (BUTTON) Close
  ____________________ (BUTTON) Search (BUTTON) Close
  (BUTTON) Search
  [11]Advanced Search
    * [12]Coronavirus
    * [13]The Sciences
    * [14]Mind
    * [15]Health
    * [16]Tech
    * [17]Sustainability
    * [18]Video
    * [19]Podcasts
    * [20]Opinion
    * [21]Publications

    * [22]Subscribe
    * [23]Current Issue
    * [24]Cart0
    * [25]Sign In
    * [26]Stay Informed

    * Share
    * Latest

    *
    *
    *
    *

  Download our New and Improved App
  [27](BUTTON) Learn More

  Download our New and Improved App
  [28](BUTTON) Learn More
  [29]Biology

Animals Use Social Distancing to Avoid Disease

  Lobsters, birds and some primates use quarantine to ward off infections
    * By [30]Dana M. Hawley, [31]Julia C. Buck | [32]Scientific American
      August 2020 Issue

    * Share on Facebook
    * Share on Twitter
    * Share on Reddit
    * Share on LinkedIn
    * Share via
    * Print

  Animals Use Social Distancing to Avoid Disease
  Credit: Nick Kilner
  Advertisement

In Brief

    * Despite how unnatural social distancing may feel to people, it is
      very much a part of the natural world, practiced by mammals,
      fishes, insects and birds.
    * Social animals stay apart, changing behaviors such as grooming to
      stop the spread of diseases that could kill them.
    * Strategies vary from shunning a sick animal to maintaining
      interactions with only the closest relatives.

  On a shallow reef in the Florida Keys, a young Caribbean spiny lobster
  returns from a night of foraging for tasty mollusks and enters its
  narrow den. Lobsters usually share these rocky crevices, and tonight a
  new one has wandered in. Something about the newcomer is not right,
  though. Chemicals in its urine smell different. These substances are
  produced when a lobster is infected with a contagious virus called
  Panulirus argus virus 1, and the healthy returning lobster seems
  alarmed. As hard as it is to find a den like this one, protected from
  predators, the young animal backs out, into open waters and away from
  the deadly virus.

  The [33]lobster’s response to disease—seen in both field and laboratory
  experiments—is one we have become all too familiar with this year:
  social distancing. People’s close interactions with family and friends
  have been cut off to reduce the spread of COVID-19. It has been
  extremely hard. [34]And many have questioned the necessity. Yet despite
  how unnatural it may feel to us, social distancing is very much a part
  of the natural world. In addition to lobsters, animals as diverse as
  monkeys, fishes, insects and birds detect and distance themselves from
  sick members of their species.

  This kind of behavior is common [35]because it helps social animals
  survive. Although living in groups makes it easier for animals to
  capture prey, stay warm and avoid predators, it also leads to outbreaks
  of contagious diseases. (Just ask any human parent with a child in day
  care.) This heightened risk has favored the evolution of behaviors that
  help animals avoid infection. Animals that social distance during an
  outbreak are the ones most likely to stay alive. That, in turn,
  increases their chances to produce offspring that also practice social
  distancing when confronted with disease. These actions are what disease
  ecologists such as ourselves term “[36]behavioral immunity.” Wild
  animals do not have vaccines, but [37]they can prevent disease by how
  they live and act.

  Immunity through behavior does come with costs, though. Social
  distancing from other members of your species, even temporarily, means
  missing out on the numerous benefits that favored social living in the
  first place. For this reason, researchers have learned that complete
  [38]shunning is just one approach animals take. Some social species
  stay together when members are infected but change certain grooming
  interactions, for example, whereas others, such as ants, limit
  encounters between individuals that play particular roles in the
  colony, all to lower the risk of infection.

Worth the Sacrifice

  The [39]ability of spiny lobsters to detect and avoid infected group
  mates has been key to their persistence in the face of Panulirus argus
  virus 1, which kills more than half of the juvenile lobsters it
  infects. Young lobsters are easy pickings for the virus because the
  animals are so social, at times denning in groups of up to 20. Safe
  homes in sponges, corals or rocky crevices along the ocean floor—and a
  mass of snapping claws—help the group of creatures defend against
  hungry predators such as triggerfish. Nevertheless, in the early 2000s
  researcher Don Behringer of the University of Florida and his
  colleagues noticed that some young lobsters were denning solo, even
  though it left them vulnerable. Most of these lonely lobsters, the
  researchers found, were infected with the contagious virus. These
  lobsters did not choose to den alone, the scientists suspected: they
  were being shunned. To confirm their hunch, the investigators placed
  several lobsters in aquarium tanks, allowing healthy crustaceans to
  choose an empty artificial den or one occupied by either a healthy or a
  diseased compatriot. In a 2006 article in Nature, the scientists
  reported that when disease was absent, healthy lobsters preferred being
  social and chose dens with a healthy lobster over empty ones. And
  lobsters strongly avoided the dens containing virus-infected lobsters,
  even though it meant they had to go it alone.

  In a follow-up study published in 2013 in Marine Ecology Progress
  Series, Behringer and his colleague Joshua Anderson showed that healthy
  lobsters spot afflicted ones by using [40]a sniff test. It turns out
  that infected lobsters have chemicals in their urine that serve as a
  danger signal to healthy group mates. When scientists used Krazy Glue
  to block the urine-releasing organs of infected lobsters, healthy
  animals no longer avoided the sick ones.

  When lobsters detect an afflicted animal, they are willing to take
  considerable risks to stay disease-free. When Mark Butler of Old
  Dominion University and his colleagues tethered a sick lobster to the
  home den of healthy lobsters in the Florida Keys, they saw that healthy
  animals often abandoned safe havens for open waters, where they were at
  much higher risk of getting eaten. When Butler’s team repeated the
  experiment with a tethered healthy lobster, there was no mass exodus.
  In their research, [41]published in 2015 in PLOS One, the scientists
  used mathematical models to show that avoidance, while not without
  costs, prevents viral outbreaks that would otherwise devastate lobster
  populations.
  Garden ants and House finches STRATEGIC DISTANCE: Garden ants (top)
  stay away from their colony when exposed to a fungus. House finches
  (bottom) avoid other birds that appear ill. Credit: Aditya Vistarakula
  Getty Images (top); Getty Images (bottom)

Protect the Valuable and Vulnerable

  Lobsters are far from the only animals that have found the benefits of
  social distancing sometimes outweigh the costs. Some other creatures,
  in fact, have developed ways to boost the payoff by practicing social
  distancing strategically, in ways that protect the most valuable or
  vulnerable in their group. The most impressive examples occur in social
  insects, where different members of a colony have distinct roles that
  affect the colony’s survival.

  In work led by Nathalie Stroeymeyt of the University of Bristol in
  England and published in 2018 in the journal Science, researchers used
  tiny digital tags to [42]track the movements of common garden ant
  colonies during an outbreak of a lethal fungus, Metarhizium brunneum.
  The spores of this fungus are passed from ant to ant through physical
  contact; it takes one to two days for the spores to penetrate the ant’s
  body and cause sickness, which is often fatal. The delay between
  exposure and sickness allowed Stroeymeyt and her colleagues to see
  whether ants changed their social behaviors in the 24 hours after they
  first detected fungal spores in their colony but before fungus-exposed
  ants showed signs of sickness.

  To measure how ants respond when disease first invades their colony,
  the researchers applied fungal spores directly to a subset of the
  forager ants that regularly leave the colony. The foragers are most
  likely to inadvertently encounter fungal spores while out searching for
  food, so this approach mimicked the natural way this fungus would be
  introduced. The behavioral responses of ants in 11 fungus-treated
  colonies were then compared with the same number of control colonies,
  where foragers were dabbed with a harmless sterile solution. Ants in
  fungus-exposed colonies started rapid and strategic social distancing
  after treatment. Within 24 hours those forager ants self-isolated by
  spending more time away from the colony compared with control-treated
  foragers.

  Healthy ants in fungus-treated colonies also strongly reduced their
  social interactions, but the way they did so depended on their roles.
  Uninfected foragers, which interact frequently with other foragers that
  might carry disease, kept their distance from the colony when disease
  was present. This prevents them from inadvertently putting the
  reproductively valuable colony members (the queen and “nurses” that
  care for the brood) at risk. The nurses also took action, moving the
  brood farther inside the nest and away from the foragers once the
  fungus was detected in the colony. The cues that the ants use to detect
  and rapidly respond to fungus exposure are still unknown, but this
  strategic social distancing was so effective that all queens and most
  nurses from the study colonies were still alive at the end of the
  experimental outbreaks.

  Garden ants protect the most valuable members of their colony, but some
  birds use a different strategy, perhaps [43]guided by the strength of
  their own immune responses and resistance to infection. Maxine
  Zylberberg and her colleagues placed house finches in three adjacent
  cages. Each central bird was flanked on one side by a healthy finch and
  on the other side by a finch that appeared sick. (It got an injection
  that made it act lethargic.) By observing the amount of time that the
  central bird spent on each side of its cage, the researchers showed
  that finches generally avoid birds that appear sick, but the degree of
  avoidance varied with the power of their own immune systems. Birds with
  higher bloodstream levels of antibodies and of one other protein that
  may signal broader immune activation showed less aversion. But birds
  with weaker levels of immunity avoided sick birds most strongly, the
  investigators reported in Biology Letters in 2013.

  [44]A similar pattern was detected in guppies affected by a contagious
  and debilitating worm called Gyrodactylus turnbulli. In work published
  in 2019 in Biology Letters, Jessica Stephenson of the University of
  Pittsburgh placed individual guppies that did not yet have worm
  infections in a central aquarium flanked by two tanks. One was empty,
  and one contained a group of three guppies that represented potential
  contagion risk. Many guppies preferred the side of the tank near other
  guppies, as expected for a social species. But some male guppies
  strongly avoided the side of the tank near the other fish, and these
  distancing guppies were later shown to be highly susceptible to worm
  infections. It makes sense that evolution would favor a strong
  expression of distancing behavior in those most at risk.
  Mandrills and mongooses RELATIVE RISK: Mandrills (left) groom close
  relatives even if they have parasites but avoid other contagious group
  mates. Banded mongooses (right), heavily dependent on group
  cooperation, groom both ill and healthy animals in their troop.
  Credit: Ralf Gelfand Getty Images (left); Mike Hill Getty Images
  (right)

The Ties That Bind

  Strategic social distancing sometimes means maintaining certain social
  ties even when they raise disease risk. Mandrills, highly social
  primates with strikingly colorful faces, illustrate this approach. This
  species can be found in groups of tens to hundreds of individuals in
  the tropical rain forests of equatorial Africa. Groups typically have a
  mix of extended family members that frequently groom one another;
  grooming improves hygiene and cements social bonds. [45]But they adjust
  their grooming behaviors in particular ways to avoid contagious group
  mates, Clémence Poirotte and his colleagues noted in a report published
  in 2017 in Science Advances. The scientists observed the daily grooming
  interactions of free-ranging mandrills in a park in Gabon and
  periodically collected fecal samples to learn which animals were
  heavily infected with intestinal parasites. Other mandrills actively
  avoided grooming those individuals. The mandrills could detect
  infection status based on smell alone: mandrills presented with two
  bamboo stalks rubbed in feces strongly avoided a stalk rubbed with
  droppings from another mandrill that had lots of parasites.

  And yet [46]mandrills sometimes forgo social distancing in the face of
  contagion. In a follow-up study, also led by Poirotte, mandrills
  continued to groom certain close relatives that had high levels of
  parasites, even while distancing from other parasitized group members.
  In their 2020 publication in Biology Letters, the researchers said that
  maintaining strong and unconditional alliances with certain relatives
  can have numerous long-term benefits in nonhuman primates, just as in
  humans. In mandrills, females with the strongest social ties start
  breeding earlier and may have more offspring over their lifetimes. Such
  evolutionary gains associated with maintaining some social ties may be
  worth the risk of potential infection.

  The social ties of some group-living animals may be so critical that
  avoidance will never be favored, even when group mates are obviously
  sick. For example, work led by Bonnie M. Fairbanks and published in
  2015 in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology showed that [47]banded
  mongooses do not avoid group members, even when they exhibit clear
  signs of disease. Banded mongooses are a highly social species native
  to sub-Saharan Africa and live in stable groups of up to 40 family
  members and nonrelatives. Group members engage in close physical
  interactions by resting on top of one another and taking turns grooming
  each other in a quid pro quo manner.

  Kathleen A. Alexander of Virginia Tech, another author on the paper,
  first noted that many mongooses in her study area in Botswana get
  visibly sick with a novel form of tuberculosis that takes months to
  kill them. Fairbanks then spent months closely tracking six troops
  affected by this disease, observing all social interactions between
  troop members. Surprisingly, healthy mongooses continued to engage in
  close interactions with visibly sick troop members. In fact, they
  groomed them to the same extent that they groomed their healthy troop
  mates, even though sick mongooses were far less likely to reciprocate.
  Distancing from sick group members may simply not be sustainable in
  species where close cooperation with other individuals for hunting and
  defense can make the difference between life and death.

Following Nature’s Lead

  Like other animals, humans have a long evolutionary history with
  infectious diseases. Many of our own forms of behavioral immunity, such
  as feelings of disgust in dirty or crowded environments, are likely the
  results of this history. But modern humans, unlike other animals, have
  many advantages when plagues come to our doors. For instance, we can
  now communicate disease threats globally in an instant. This ability
  allows us to institute social distancing before disease appears in our
  local community—a tactic that has saved many lives. We have advanced
  digital communication platforms, from e-mail to group video chats, that
  allow us to keep our physical distance while maintaining some social
  connections. Other animals lose social ties with actual distance. But
  perhaps the biggest human advantage is the ability to develop
  sophisticated nonbehavioral tools, such as vaccines, that prevent
  disease without the need for costly behavioral changes. Vaccination
  allows us to maintain rich, interactive social lives despite contagious
  diseases such as polio and measles that would otherwise ravage us.

  When it comes to stopping novel diseases like COVID-19, however, [48]we
  are in much the same boat as other animals. Here, as in nature,
  tried-and-true behaviors such as social distancing are our best tools
  until vaccines or treatments can be developed. But just like other
  animals, we have to be strategic about it. Like mandrills and ants, we
  can maintain the most essential social interactions and distance
  farthest from those who are most vulnerable and who we could infect by
  accident. The success of spiny lobsters against a devastating virus in
  the Caribbean shows that short-term costs of social distancing, while
  severe, have long-term payoffs for survival. As unnatural as it may
  feel, we need only follow nature’s lead.

  This article was originally published with the title "Animals Apart" in
  Scientific American 323, 2, 36-41 (August 2020)

  doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0820-36

MORE TO EXPLORE

  Infection-Avoidance Behaviour in Humans and Other Animals. Valerie A.
  Curtis in Trends in Immunology, Vol. 35, No. 10, pages 457–464; October
  2014.

  No Evidence for Avoidance of Visibly Diseased Conspecifics in the
  Highly Social Banded Mongoose (Mungos mungo). Bonnie M. Fairbanks, Dana
  M. Hawley and Kathleen A. Alexander in Behavioral Ecology and
  Sociobiology, Vol. 69, No. 3, pages 371–381; March 2015.

  Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Parasite Avoidance. J. C.
  Buck, S. B. Weinstein and H. S. Young in Trends in Ecology and
  Evolution, Vol. 33, No. 8, pages 619–632; August 2018.

FROM OUR ARCHIVES

  The Social Lives of the Amboseli Baboons. Lydia Denworth; January 2019.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

  author-avatar

Dana M. Hawley

  Dana M. Hawley is a professor at Virginia Tech who studies social
  behavior and disease among animals.

  Credit: Nick Higgins
  author-avatar

Julia C. Buck

  Julia C. Buck is an assistant professor at the University of North
  Carolina at Wilmington, where she runs a disease ecology laboratory.

  Credit: Nick Higgins

Read This Next

  Behavior & Society

Racism in Health Care Isn't Always Obvious

  3 hours ago — Joseph V. Sakran, Ebony Jade Hilton and Chethan Sathya |
  [49]Opinion
  Space

Aliens Could Have a Hundred Eyes

  3 hours ago
  Public Health

Viral Learning Curve

  4 hours ago — Andrea Gawrylewski
  Physics

Hidden Neutrino Particles May Be a Link to the Dark Sector

  5 hours ago — William Charles Louis and Richard G. Van de Water
  Space

Comet NEOWISE Could Be Spectacular: Here's How to See It

  6 hours ago — Scott Hershberger
  Medicine

COVID-19 Is Forcing Us to Rethink Clinical Trials for Cancer Treatments

  7 hours ago — Pat Basu and Maurie Markman | [50]Opinion
  Advertisement
  [51]Scientific American Volume 323, Issue 2
  In the store
  Scientific American
  [52]Scientific American Volume 323, Issue 2
  [53]$6.99

Newsletter

Get smart. Sign up for our email newsletter.

  [54]Sign Up

Support Science Journalism

  Discover world-changing science. Explore our digital archive back to
  1845, including articles by more than 150 Nobel Prize winners.
  [55]Subscribe Now! Support Science Journalism

  Follow us
    * [56]instagram
    * [57]soundcloud
    * [58]youtube
    * [59]twitter
    * [60]facebook
    * [61]rss

  Scientific american arabic
  [62]العربية

    * [63]Return & Refund Policy
    * [64]About
    * [65]Press Room

    * [66]FAQs
    * [67]Contact Us
    * [68]Site Map

    * [69]Advertise
    * [70]SA Custom Media
    * [71]Terms of Use

    * [72]Privacy Policy
    * [73]California Consumer Privacy Statement
    * [74]Use of Cookies
    * [75]International Editions

  Scientific American is part of Springer Nature, which owns or has
  commercial relations with thousands of scientific publications (many of
  them can be found at [76]www.springernature.com/us). Scientific
  American maintains a strict policy of editorial independence in
  reporting developments in science to our readers.

  © 2020 Scientific American, a Division of Springer Nature America, Inc.

  All Rights Reserved.

  [77]Scroll To Top (BUTTON)

  You have free articles left.
  (BUTTON)
  Temp Paywall Img

  Support our award-winning coverage of advances in science & technology.
  [78](BUTTON) See Subscription Options

  Already a subscriber? [79]Sign in.

  Subscribers get more award-winning coverage of advances in science &
  technology.
  [80](BUTTON) Sign In

  [81]See Subscription Options

References

  Visible links
  1. https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-PL33XX4
  2. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/#sa_body
  3. https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/subscribe/scientific-american-magazine/
  4. https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/archive/?magazineFilterID=all
  5. https://www.scientificamerican.com/
  6. https://www.scientificamerican.com/checkout/#/cart
  7. https://www.scientificamerican.com/my-account/forgot-password/
  8. https://www.scientificamerican.com/my-account/register/
  9. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/newsletter-sign-up/?origincode=2019_sciam_StayInformed_NewsletterSignUp
 10. https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/subscribe/scientific-american-magazine/
 11. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/#advanced-search
 12. https://www.scientificamerican.com/tag/The+Coronavirus+Outbreak/
 13. https://www.scientificamerican.com/the-sciences/
 14. https://www.scientificamerican.com/mind/
 15. https://www.scientificamerican.com/health/
 16. https://www.scientificamerican.com/tech/
 17. https://www.scientificamerican.com/sustainability/
 18. https://www.scientificamerican.com/video/
 19. https://www.scientificamerican.com/podcasts/
 20. https://www.scientificamerican.com/section/opinion/
 21. https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/
 22. https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/subscribe/scientific-american-magazine/
 23. https://www.scientificamerican.com/magazine/sa/2020/07-01/
 24. https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/shopping-cart/
 25. https://www.scientificamerican.com/my-account/login/
 26. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/newsletter-sign-up/
 27. https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/offer/scientific-american-app-information/?utm_source=site&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=app-launch&utm_content=banner&utm_term=homepage-banner
 28. https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/offer/scientific-american-app-information/?utm_source=site&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=app-launch&utm_content=banner&utm_term=homepage-banner
 29. https://www.scientificamerican.com/biology/
 30. https://www.scientificamerican.com/author/dana-m-hawley/
 31. https://www.scientificamerican.com/author/julia-c-buck/
 32. https://www.scientificamerican.com/magazine/sa/2020/08-01/
 33. https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v474/p191-200/
 34. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/why-some-people-resist-advice-on-how-to-behave-in-the-pandemic/
 35. https://www.cell.com/trends/immunology/fulltext/S1471-4906(14)00148-3?_returnURL=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1471490614001483?showall=true
 36. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01004/full
 37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169534718301083
 38. https://www.cell.com/trends/immunology/fulltext/S1471-4906(14)00148-3
 39. https://www.nature.com/articles/441421a
 40. https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v474/p191-200/
 41. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126374
 42. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/362/6417/941
 43. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0856
 44. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0557
 45. https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/4/e1601721.short
 46. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0869
 47. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00265-014-1849-x
 48. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-behavioral-immune-system/
 49. https://www.scientificamerican.com/section/opinion/
 50. https://www.scientificamerican.com/section/opinion/
 51. https://www.scientificamerican.com/magazine/sa/2020/08-01/
 52. https://www.scientificamerican.com/magazine/sa/2020/08-01/
 53. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/
 54. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/newsletter-sign-up/?origincode=2016_sciam_ArticleFooter_NewsletterSignUp&category=subjects/the-sciences/biology
 55. https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/subscribe/scientific-american-magazine/
 56. https://www.instagram.com/scientific_american/?hl=en
 57. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/
 58. https://www.youtube.com/user/SciAmerican
 59. https://twitter.com/sciam
 60. https://www.facebook.com/ScientificAmerican
 61. http://rss.sciam.com/ScientificAmerican-Global
 62. https://www.scientificamerican.com/arabic/
 63. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/return-refund-policy/
 64. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/about-scientific-american/
 65. https://www.scientificamerican.com/pressroom/
 66. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/frequently-asked-questions/
 67. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/contact-us/
 68. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/sitemap
 69. https://www.scientificamerican.com/mediakit/
 70. https://partnerships.nature.com/product/nature-research-custom-media/
 71. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/terms-of-use/
 72. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/privacy-policy/
 73. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/california-consumer-privacy-statement/
 74. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/use-of-cookies/
 75. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/international/
 76. http://www.springernature.com/us
 77. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/#sa_body
 78. https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/subscribe/scientific-american-magazine/
 79. https://www.scientificamerican.com/my-account/login/?s=1
 80. https://www.scientificamerican.com/my-account/login/?s=1
 81. https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/subscribe/scientific-american-magazine/

  Hidden links:
 83. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/
 84. https://m.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/
 85. https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/?amp;text=Animals%20Use%20Social%20Distancing%20to%20Avoid%20Disease&via=sciam
 86. http://www.reddit.com/submit?url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/
 87. https://www.scientificamerican.com/email-this-article/?contentid=77BE7D47-D27F-41D5-913DCF9CA02C4FB1
 88. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/
 89. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/
 90. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/
 91. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/
 92. https://www.scientificamerican.com/email-this-article/?contentid=77BE7D47-D27F-41D5-913DCF9CA02C4FB1
 93. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/animals-use-social-distancing-to-avoid-disease1/?print=true
 94. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/racism-in-health-care-isnt-always-obvious/
 95. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/aliens-could-have-a-hundred-eyes/
 96. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/viral-learning-curve/
 97. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/hidden-neutrino-particles-may-be-a-link-to-the-dark-sector/
 98. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/comet-neowise-could-be-spectacular-heres-how-to-see-it/
 99. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/covid-19-is-forcing-us-to-rethink-clinical-trials-for-cancer-treatments/
100. https://www.scientificamerican.com/page/newsletter-sign-up/?origincode=2019_sciam_adblockers_newsletter
101. https://www.scientificamerican.com/store/offer/july-4th/?utm_source=site&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=July-4th&utm_content=banner&utm_term=LP_25poff_v1_display_toaster