#[1]Loic Dachary » Feed [2]Loic Dachary » Comments Feed [3]Loic Dachary
  » How the cancel culture was leveraged against RMS Comments Feed
  [4]recovering from lost partition table: a use case [5]alternate
  [6]alternate

  [7]Skip to content

  Loic Dachary

  [8]Loic Dachary

  Free Software developer journey

  Posted on [9]February 10, 2020 by [10]admin

How the cancel culture was leveraged against RMS

  Starting in August 2019, [11]MIT was being put on the spot for
  accepting money from [12]Jeffrey Epstein and accusations against the
  late [13]Marvin Minsky for having sex with one of his victims
  resurfaced. In a call for protest, someone even wrote that Marvin
  Minsky assaulted her. In reaction Richard Stallman replied in an email
  that [14]“the word “assaulting” presumes that [Marvin Minsky] applied
  force or violence, in some unspecified way, but the article itself says
  no such thing”. The rise of the [15]“cancel culture” makes it very
  hazardous to publicly say or write anything regarding sexism,
  prostitution or racism. Despite this, Richard Stallman has published a
  number of blog entries on those topics over the years, ignoring people
  urging him to stop or become a target. But this time he caught the
  attention of someone.

  After reading Richard Stallman email, [16]Selam G. published an article
  and commented: “[Richard Stallman] says that an enslaved child could,
  somehow, be “entirely willing””. What Richard Stallman actually wrote
  is: “We can imagine many scenarios, but the most plausible scenario is
  that she presented herself to him as entirely willing. Assuming she was
  being coerced by Epstein, he would have had every reason to tell her to
  conceal that from most of his associates”. More tabloid articles
  followed, further mischaracterising Richard Stallman statements. A
  [17]photo of Richard Stallman office door at MIT labeled “Richard
  Stallman: Knight for Justice (also: hot ladies)” was also included in
  Selam G.’s article as a proof against Richard Stallman.

  In response, Richard Stallman commented on his blog: [18]“headlines say
  that I defended Epstein. Nothing could be further from the truth. I’ve
  called him a “serial rapist”, and said he deserved to be imprisoned.”
  As for the label on Richard Stallman office door, it was added by an
  unknown person, over a decade ago. In a [19]documentary shot in
  2017/2018, it only reads “Richard Stallman: Knight for Justice” (at
  6:22) because Richard Stallman removed the ending: (also: hot ladies).
  The content and the tone of Selam G.’s article is archetypal of the
  cancel culture and she was joined by [20]people sharing the same faith
  to demand the resignation of Richard Stallman.

  Any effort to establish the truth was a loss of time: Richard Stallman
  participating in a discussion about rape and prostitution was
  blasphemy. He was not attacked for what he wrote, he was attacked for
  writing on a forbidden topic. Another similar and well documented
  instance is [21]what happened to Bret W. in 2017 at the Evergreen
  College when he wrote [22]“one’s right to speak –or to be– must never
  be based on skin color” in an email. In both cases there were many
  witness who did not intervene for fear of being the next target. I also
  stayed silent and horrified while Richard Stallman was shamed publicly.
  I wanted to believe it would blow over after a few days. I trusted the
  Free Software community to be rational and eventually disregard this
  episode. I was sorely mistaken.

  Two days after Selam G. article was published, Software Freedom
  Conservancy who is run by some of the most influential people in the
  Free Software movement, published a statement [23]demanding Richard
  Stallman’s resignation from the FSF. Neil McGovern, executive director
  of GNOME, also [24]asked for Richard Stallman resignation and links to
  a tabloid article grossly mischaracterising Richard Stallman. They
  endorsed the attacks and [25]legitimized them in the eye of the Free
  Software community. The next day [26]Richard Stallman resigned from his
  position as president of the FSF.

  It all happened very quickly but the roots of Richard Stallman’s
  dispute with other members of the Free Software community are deep.
  Software Freedom Conservancy states that [27]“when considered with
  other reprehensible comments [Richard Stallman] has published over the
  years, these incidents form a pattern of behavior that is incompatible
  with the goals of the free software movement” and Neil McGovern wrote
  something similar. Although they did not reference any specific event,
  there are some publicly available records of past disputes. For
  instance, in September 2018, Richard Stallman wrote a [28]blog entry
  very similar to the defense of Marvin Minsky. He rewrote it in the
  following weeks because, in his own words: [29]“some people reading
  earlier versions of this note seem to have got the idea that I condone
  enslavement of prostitutes”.

  I can only assume the respected members of the Free Software community
  who leveraged the cancel culture and tabloid journalism felt justified
  because of years of frustrating disputes with Richard Stallman. But
  they made a terrible mistake. Richard Stallman was unjustly and
  severely punished. He no longer has a position at the FSF, which he
  founded 34 years ago, he also lost his position at MIT, his scheduled
  talks could be canceled and he [30]lost his home.

  History will remember that in 2019 Richard Stallman took a major hit
  from the cancel culture and tabloid journalists. And also that
  respected members of the Free Software community endorsed the cancel
  culture and tabloid journalists. They sent an ominous message to all
  their opponents: we fight dirty. They negated the benefit of dialog,
  any sense of rational thinking and threw away years of debate with
  Richard Stallman. Leveraging [31]someone who had no clue about the past
  disputes to get rid of their opponent proved to be much more efficient.
  We should now expect that some Free Software activists will use the
  cancel culture as a mean to an end. But what they should do instead is
  to ignore the furor, wait until it passes and resume a discussion based
  on truth and logic. It takes longer but it is the only way to build a
  safe and inclusive community.

  Categories[32]Uncategorized

Post navigation

  [33]Previous PostPrevious recovering from lost partition table: a use
  case

  Search for: ____________________ (BUTTON) Search

Recent Posts

    * [34]How the cancel culture was leveraged against RMS
    * [35]recovering from lost partition table: a use case
    * [36]Why I deleted my GitHub account
    * [37]Running tests on a Nextcloud app
    * [38]From a SecureDrop talk to the first edition of the privacy
      devroom at FOSDEM

Recent Comments

    * Florent B on [39]HOWTO nginx & letsencrypt on Debian GNU/Linux
      stretch/9
    * [40]Loic Dachary on [41]Removing potential backdoors from Tails 3.0
    * Marcel on [42]Removing potential backdoors from Tails 3.0
    * [43]Loic Dachary on [44]Predicting Ceph PG placement
    * Ben England on [45]Predicting Ceph PG placement

Archives

    * [46]February 2020
    * [47]August 2018
    * [48]July 2018
    * [49]April 2018
    * [50]February 2018
    * [51]January 2018
    * [52]December 2017
    * [53]September 2017
    * [54]August 2017
    * [55]June 2017
    * [56]May 2017
    * [57]April 2017
    * [58]March 2017
    * [59]November 2016
    * [60]April 2016
    * [61]November 2015
    * [62]October 2015
    * [63]September 2015
    * [64]August 2015
    * [65]July 2015
    * [66]June 2015
    * [67]May 2015
    * [68]April 2015
    * [69]March 2015
    * [70]February 2015
    * [71]January 2015
    * [72]December 2014
    * [73]November 2014
    * [74]October 2014
    * [75]September 2014
    * [76]August 2014
    * [77]July 2014
    * [78]June 2014
    * [79]May 2014
    * [80]April 2014
    * [81]March 2014
    * [82]February 2014
    * [83]January 2014
    * [84]December 2013
    * [85]November 2013
    * [86]October 2013
    * [87]September 2013
    * [88]August 2013
    * [89]July 2013
    * [90]June 2013
    * [91]May 2013
    * [92]March 2013
    * [93]February 2013
    * [94]January 2013
    * [95]December 2012
    * [96]November 2012
    * [97]October 2012
    * [98]September 2012
    * [99]November 2011
    * [100]October 2011
    * [101]September 2011
    * [102]August 2011
    * [103]July 2011
    * [104]June 2011
    * [105]May 2011
    * [106]April 2011
    * [107]March 2011
    * [108]February 2011
    * [109]January 2011

Categories

    * [110]AMT
    * [111]Anonymity
    * [112]Bio++
    * [113]cardstories
    * [114]ccache
    * [115]ceph
    * [116]Code path
    * [117]crush
    * [118]debian
    * [119]Diablo
    * [120]DNS
    * [121]docker
    * [122]emacs
    * [123]Essex
    * [124]farsides
    * [125]Folsom
    * [126]FOSDEM
    * [127]FSF
    * [128]game
    * [129]gamequery
    * [130]ganeti
    * [131]gerrit
    * [132]git
    * [133]gitlab
    * [134]gource
    * [135]grizzly
    * [136]Havana
    * [137]jenkins
    * [138]jerasure
    * [139]lacie-nas
    * [140]Legal
    * [141]libcrush
    * [142]libreoffice
    * [143]licensing
    * [144]Liquid Democracy
    * [145]magit
    * [146]marionnet
    * [147]mercurial
    * [148]Nextcloud
    * [149]nginx
    * [150]OpenSceneGraph
    * [151]openstack
    * [152]openstreetmap
    * [153]osgjs
    * [154]packaging-farm
    * [155]paste3d
    * [156]pidgin
    * [157]pokersource
    * [158]political memory
    * [159]PostegreSQL
    * [160]puppet
    * [161]Raring
    * [162]razor
    * [163]redmine
    * [164]rhel
    * [165]SecureDrop
    * [166]shorewall
    * [167]symfony
    * [168]tails
    * [169]tinc
    * [170]turnkeylinux
    * [171]twisted
    * [172]Ubuntu
    * [173]Uncategorized
    * [174]Upstream University
    * [175]videoshell
    * [176]VNC
    * [177]voozanoo
    * [178]vPro
    * [179]webkit
    * [180]Wheezy
    * [181]xine
    * [182]XiVO

Meta

    * [183]Log in
    * [184]Entries RSS
    * [185]Comments RSS
    * [186]WordPress.org

  [187]Proudly powered by WordPress

References

  1. https://blog.dachary.org/feed/
  2. https://blog.dachary.org/comments/feed/
  3. https://blog.dachary.org/2020/02/10/how-the-cancel-culture-was-leveraged-against-rms/feed/
  4. https://blog.dachary.org/2018/08/28/recovering-from-lost-partition-table-a-use-case/
  5. https://blog.dachary.org/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed?url=https://blog.dachary.org/2020/02/10/how-the-cancel-culture-was-leveraged-against-rms/
  6. https://blog.dachary.org/wp-json/oembed/1.0/embed?url=https://blog.dachary.org/2020/02/10/how-the-cancel-culture-was-leveraged-against-rms/&format=xml
  7. https://blog.dachary.org/2020/02/10/how-the-cancel-culture-was-leveraged-against-rms/#content
  8. https://blog.dachary.org/
  9. https://blog.dachary.org/2020/02/10/how-the-cancel-culture-was-leveraged-against-rms/
 10. https://blog.dachary.org/author/admin/
 11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_Computer_Science_and_Artificial_Intelligence_Laboratory
 12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein
 13. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvin_Minsky
 14. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6405929/09132019142056-0001.pdf
 15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call-out_culture
 16. https://medium.com/@selamie/remove-richard-stallman-fec6ec210794
 17. https://miro.medium.com/max/6528/1*lDSkAjF1958TpEafxuJsLg.jpeg
 18. https://stallman.org/archives/2019-jul-oct.html#14_September_2019_(Statements_about_Epstein)
 19. https://youtu.be/nZEoi2LOfVY?t=359
 20. https://areomagazine.com/2018/12/18/postmodern-religion-and-the-faith-of-social-justice/
 21. https://areomagazine.com/2019/03/15/teaching-to-transgress-rage-and-entitlement-at-evergreen-college/
 22. https://i0.wp.com/areomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Picture1.png?w=939&ssl=1
 23. https://sfconservancy.org/news/2019/sep/16/rms-does-not-speak-for-us/
 24. https://blog.halon.org.uk/2019/09/gnome-foundation-relationship-gnu-fsf/
 25. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Richard_Stallman#Stepping_down_from_CSAIL_at_MIT,_Resignation_from_FSF
 26. https://www.fsf.org/news/richard-m-stallman-resigns
 27. https://sfconservancy.org/news/2019/sep/16/rms-does-not-speak-for-us/
 28. https://web.archive.org/web/20180924231708/https://stallman.org/archives/2018-jul-oct.html#23_September_2018_(Cody_Wilson)
 29. https://stallman.org/archives/2018-jul-oct.html#23_September_2018_(Cody_Wilson)
 30. https://web.archive.org/web/20190928065701/https://stallman.org/archives/2019-jul-oct.html#27_September_2019_(Urgent:_Seeking_housing)
 31. https://medium.com/@selamie/remove-richard-stallman-appendix-a-a7e41e784f88
 32. https://blog.dachary.org/category/uncategorized/
 33. https://blog.dachary.org/2018/08/28/recovering-from-lost-partition-table-a-use-case/
 34. https://blog.dachary.org/2020/02/10/how-the-cancel-culture-was-leveraged-against-rms/
 35. https://blog.dachary.org/2018/08/28/recovering-from-lost-partition-table-a-use-case/
 36. https://blog.dachary.org/2018/07/29/why-i-deleted-my-github-account/
 37. https://blog.dachary.org/2018/04/29/running-tests-on-a-nextcloud-app/
 38. https://blog.dachary.org/2018/02/06/from-a-securedrop-talk-to-the-first-edition-of-the-privacy-devroom-at-fosdem/
 39. https://blog.dachary.org/2017/08/15/howto-nginx-letsencrypt-on-debian-gnulinux-stretch9/#comment-209
 40. http://dachary.org/
 41. https://blog.dachary.org/2017/06/18/removing-potential-backdoors-from-tails-3-0/#comment-205
 42. https://blog.dachary.org/2017/06/18/removing-potential-backdoors-from-tails-3-0/#comment-204
 43. http://dachary.org/
 44. https://blog.dachary.org/2017/03/29/predicting-ceph-pg-placement/#comment-197
 45. https://blog.dachary.org/2017/03/29/predicting-ceph-pg-placement/#comment-196
 46. https://blog.dachary.org/2020/02/
 47. https://blog.dachary.org/2018/08/
 48. https://blog.dachary.org/2018/07/
 49. https://blog.dachary.org/2018/04/
 50. https://blog.dachary.org/2018/02/
 51. https://blog.dachary.org/2018/01/
 52. https://blog.dachary.org/2017/12/
 53. https://blog.dachary.org/2017/09/
 54. https://blog.dachary.org/2017/08/
 55. https://blog.dachary.org/2017/06/
 56. https://blog.dachary.org/2017/05/
 57. https://blog.dachary.org/2017/04/
 58. https://blog.dachary.org/2017/03/
 59. https://blog.dachary.org/2016/11/
 60. https://blog.dachary.org/2016/04/
 61. https://blog.dachary.org/2015/11/
 62. https://blog.dachary.org/2015/10/
 63. https://blog.dachary.org/2015/09/
 64. https://blog.dachary.org/2015/08/
 65. https://blog.dachary.org/2015/07/
 66. https://blog.dachary.org/2015/06/
 67. https://blog.dachary.org/2015/05/
 68. https://blog.dachary.org/2015/04/
 69. https://blog.dachary.org/2015/03/
 70. https://blog.dachary.org/2015/02/
 71. https://blog.dachary.org/2015/01/
 72. https://blog.dachary.org/2014/12/
 73. https://blog.dachary.org/2014/11/
 74. https://blog.dachary.org/2014/10/
 75. https://blog.dachary.org/2014/09/
 76. https://blog.dachary.org/2014/08/
 77. https://blog.dachary.org/2014/07/
 78. https://blog.dachary.org/2014/06/
 79. https://blog.dachary.org/2014/05/
 80. https://blog.dachary.org/2014/04/
 81. https://blog.dachary.org/2014/03/
 82. https://blog.dachary.org/2014/02/
 83. https://blog.dachary.org/2014/01/
 84. https://blog.dachary.org/2013/12/
 85. https://blog.dachary.org/2013/11/
 86. https://blog.dachary.org/2013/10/
 87. https://blog.dachary.org/2013/09/
 88. https://blog.dachary.org/2013/08/
 89. https://blog.dachary.org/2013/07/
 90. https://blog.dachary.org/2013/06/
 91. https://blog.dachary.org/2013/05/
 92. https://blog.dachary.org/2013/03/
 93. https://blog.dachary.org/2013/02/
 94. https://blog.dachary.org/2013/01/
 95. https://blog.dachary.org/2012/12/
 96. https://blog.dachary.org/2012/11/
 97. https://blog.dachary.org/2012/10/
 98. https://blog.dachary.org/2012/09/
 99. https://blog.dachary.org/2011/11/
100. https://blog.dachary.org/2011/10/
101. https://blog.dachary.org/2011/09/
102. https://blog.dachary.org/2011/08/
103. https://blog.dachary.org/2011/07/
104. https://blog.dachary.org/2011/06/
105. https://blog.dachary.org/2011/05/
106. https://blog.dachary.org/2011/04/
107. https://blog.dachary.org/2011/03/
108. https://blog.dachary.org/2011/02/
109. https://blog.dachary.org/2011/01/
110. https://blog.dachary.org/category/amt/
111. https://blog.dachary.org/category/anonymity/
112. https://blog.dachary.org/category/bio/
113. https://blog.dachary.org/category/cardstories/
114. https://blog.dachary.org/category/ccache/
115. https://blog.dachary.org/category/ceph/
116. https://blog.dachary.org/category/code-path/
117. https://blog.dachary.org/category/crush/
118. https://blog.dachary.org/category/debian/
119. https://blog.dachary.org/category/diablo/
120. https://blog.dachary.org/category/dns/
121. https://blog.dachary.org/category/docker/
122. https://blog.dachary.org/category/emacs/
123. https://blog.dachary.org/category/essex/
124. https://blog.dachary.org/category/farsides/
125. https://blog.dachary.org/category/folsom/
126. https://blog.dachary.org/category/fosdem/
127. https://blog.dachary.org/category/fsf/
128. https://blog.dachary.org/category/game/
129. https://blog.dachary.org/category/gamequery/
130. https://blog.dachary.org/category/ganeti/
131. https://blog.dachary.org/category/gerrit/
132. https://blog.dachary.org/category/git/
133. https://blog.dachary.org/category/gitlab/
134. https://blog.dachary.org/category/gource/
135. https://blog.dachary.org/category/grizzly/
136. https://blog.dachary.org/category/havana/
137. https://blog.dachary.org/category/jenkins/
138. https://blog.dachary.org/category/jerasure/
139. https://blog.dachary.org/category/lacie-nas/
140. https://blog.dachary.org/category/legal/
141. https://blog.dachary.org/category/libcrush/
142. https://blog.dachary.org/category/libreoffice/
143. https://blog.dachary.org/category/licensing/
144. https://blog.dachary.org/category/liquid-democracy/
145. https://blog.dachary.org/category/magit/
146. https://blog.dachary.org/category/marionnet/
147. https://blog.dachary.org/category/mercurial/
148. https://blog.dachary.org/category/nextcloud/
149. https://blog.dachary.org/category/nginx/
150. https://blog.dachary.org/category/openscenegraph/
151. https://blog.dachary.org/category/openstack/
152. https://blog.dachary.org/category/openstreetmap/
153. https://blog.dachary.org/category/osgjs/
154. https://blog.dachary.org/category/packaging-farm/
155. https://blog.dachary.org/category/paste3d/
156. https://blog.dachary.org/category/pidgin/
157. https://blog.dachary.org/category/pokersource/
158. https://blog.dachary.org/category/political-memory/
159. https://blog.dachary.org/category/postegresql/
160. https://blog.dachary.org/category/puppet/
161. https://blog.dachary.org/category/raring/
162. https://blog.dachary.org/category/razor/
163. https://blog.dachary.org/category/redmine/
164. https://blog.dachary.org/category/rhel/
165. https://blog.dachary.org/category/securedrop/
166. https://blog.dachary.org/category/shorewall/
167. https://blog.dachary.org/category/symfony/
168. https://blog.dachary.org/category/tails/
169. https://blog.dachary.org/category/tinc/
170. https://blog.dachary.org/category/turnkeylinux/
171. https://blog.dachary.org/category/twisted/
172. https://blog.dachary.org/category/ubuntu/
173. https://blog.dachary.org/category/uncategorized/
174. https://blog.dachary.org/category/upstream-university/
175. https://blog.dachary.org/category/videoshell/
176. https://blog.dachary.org/category/vnc/
177. https://blog.dachary.org/category/voozanoo/
178. https://blog.dachary.org/category/vpro/
179. https://blog.dachary.org/category/webkit/
180. https://blog.dachary.org/category/wheezy/
181. https://blog.dachary.org/category/xine/
182. https://blog.dachary.org/category/xivo/
183. https://blog.dachary.org/wp-login.php
184. https://blog.dachary.org/feed/
185. https://blog.dachary.org/comments/feed/
186. https://wordpress.org/
187. https://wordpress.org/