Subj : Desired Living Document (section): Author Compliance

From : mark lewis
Date : Fri Apr 19 2019 02:52 pm


On 2019 Apr 19 20:20:30, you wrote to me:

ml>>>> no, not annoying but it is against spec...

BF>>> What spec?

ml>> the one that says

BF>    blah blah blah. FTS number please, after all this is where we are.

who is this "we" you speak of? are both of you that lazy? ;)

ml>> ok... what version, please? can you capture packets coming in and
ml>> those generated after and take a look to see if the message body is
ml>> being modified by removal of the (blank) line in question?

BF>    Negatory. That's the beauty of my system. I have absolutely no means to
BF> intercept any message on passthru here. Most importantly -- and far less
BF> importantly echomail -- netmail. I take real pride in that and have done
it
BF> this way for a quarter of a century. YMMV.

oh good grief... all that's being asked for is to capture the PKT with these
echomail messages so they can be studied... other than a packet level password
that should be X'd out, a hex dump of the PKT would be just fine... this is for
the smooth operation of the network, ya know...

)\/(ark

Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it
wrong...
... Anger makes dull men witty, but it keeps them poor. -Francis Bacon
---
* Origin:  (1:3634/12.73)