Subj : Re: Objection
To   : Michiel van der Vlist
From : Dan Clough
Date : Sun Mar 24 2019 09:26 pm

-=> Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Dan Clough <=-

DC> Are you saying now that you are not going to tell the reason?

MvV> No, I am not saying that. What I am saying is that I did not say
MvV> when.

Yeah, OK.  Just read your reason in the new FidoNews.

Seems to me that not voting doesn't accomplish anything, save
perhaps making you feel better or that you "took a stand".

If you really were not in favor of some/all of the candidates,
wouldn't a "NO" vote have sent a better message, and perhaps had
an influence on the outcome?

Is it allowable for somebody (you) to actively "campaign" against
somebody?  Like do some public advertisements stating why you feel
they should not be elected?

Certainly some private Netmails to other RCs could have been sent,
right?

Perhaps you didn't want others to know that you were against
particular candidates?

Anyway... it's over until the next election.  Thanks for at least
writing up the reason for publication.



... Forbidden fruit is responsible for many a bad jam.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.51
--- SBBSecho 3.07-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)

You are viewing proxied material from vert.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.