Subj : Re: Biden Impeachment
To   : Aaron Thomas
From : Brian Klauss
Date : Tue Jan 26 2021 10:23 am

 Re: Re: Biden Impeachment
 By: Aaron Thomas to Brian Klauss on Tue Jan 26 2021 02:12 pm

>  BK> The claim against Biden is more believable?  Honesty, how or why?
>  BK> Biden did nothing illegal as Obama's Vice President and hasn't done a
>  BK> single thing illegal as our President.  Trump, on the other hand,
>  BK> violated multiple laws and has been impeached twice.
>
> Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in aid to Ukraine if Zelesnky didn't
> fire the country's top prosecutor who was about to prosecute a corruption
> scandal involving Hunter's energy company. Hunter would have never been
> involved with Burisma Holdings in the first place if Joe wasn't VP.

As a global leader in ensuring the contiunance of democracy, democratic elections, and prosecuting corruption whenever possible, the threatening to withold aide is something we can and should do.  Hunter Biden was hired onto the board of Burisma Holding to ensure corporate governance best practices (and maybe as a means for father and son to talk about what is happening).  As a lawyer, who is strong in corporate law, it was a logic position for him.  Yes, there is the consideration of a conflict of interest, but that never occurred.  Viktor Shokin was removed by the Ukrainian parliament in March 2016.

> Trump might have abused his power too, by allegedly pressuring Ukraine to
> investigate Joe. But Trump has already been tried and was found not guilty.
> Now it's time for Joe to go on trial.

Why?  What did Joe Biden do as Obama's vice president in relation to Ukraine that was illegal?  Your conspiracy theories are perplexing as they make zero logical sense.  If Hunter Biden did anything illegal, he should be tried, not the other way around.

> You should send Joe a screenshot of your vague banter because that might be
> the best thing his defense could come up with.

You continually make me laugh.  I'm not vague, I'm actually quite verbose.  The only thing Joe Biden did was be on the wrong side of Trump's conspiracy theories that hold zero water.

>  BK> Being opportunistic as payback is ridiculous.  Not only is she wasting
>  BK> the time of her colleagues, she continues to float more conspiracy
>  BK> theories just for the sake that she wants Trump to remain in office.
>
> You can't be a Kamala Harris supporter without also supporting a waste of
> time.

Again, the more time you spend floating the idea that Kamala Harris isn't suitable as a Vice President will force me to float the following: she is more qualified to be Vice President than most of Donald Trump's picks for his administration.  Come on, Betsy DeVos or any of his other millionaire/billionaire "swamp creatures".  The only advantage of putting people in power that have no idea what they are doing is to ensure they do whatever their boss says, can ensure the continued lining of their pockets, and are simply disposable as they have more than a sufficient nest egg to fall-back on.

>  BK> Anyone who can claim a stolen election when a court packed by Donald
>  BK> Trump says he has no standing and his claims are baseless is just that,
>
> I don't think you know what court-packing means. Why don't you google it and
> we'll revisit that issue once you've got a better understanding?

Definition: The practice of changing the number or composition of judges on a court, making it ore favorable to particular goals or ideologies, and typically involving an increase in the number of seats on the court. (dictionary.com - "Court Packing")

Again, changing the balance of the Supreme Court from centrist to right leaning by appointing three justices is court packing.  His purpose was to ensure the court would side with him.

Sorry, man, keep floating your conspiracy theories.  You'll lose every time.

Brian Klauss <-> Dream Master
Caught in a Dream | caughtinadream.com a Synchronet BBS
--- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux
* Origin: Caught in a Dream - caughtinadream.com (1:104/116)