Subj : Re: Quid Pro Quo - Joe
To : Dale Shipp
From : Gregory Deyss
Date : Wed Dec 25 2019 08:20 am
On 25 Dec 2019, Dale Shipp said the following...
DS> GD> It is obvious, the prosecutor that was fired was investigating Hunter
DS> GD> and the gas and oil company that Hunter was serving on the board on.
DS>
DS> Nope -- the investigation of Burisa had been concluded and put on the
DS> shelf. Plus, Hunter Biden was not under investigation. That prosecutor
DS> was fired because he was corupt.
Ukraine is the most corrupt place on the planet.
Follow the money and it will lead to the truth.
If the prosecutor was corrupt as you have suggested, then why was a billion
dollars used in typical Quid Pro Quo fashion.
This is not open for debate when there is video-graphic evidence of Joe Biden
talking about what transpired.
You can't change the time line of these events to evade responsibility for
the Democratic Candidate for President.
What if this was Donald Trump Jr. and Donald Trump Sr. the media would lose
their minds, and would propel their political counterparts in the Democratic
Party to call for a massive conflict of interest, and you know this....
DS> Hunter is a lawyer. Needs to know the law, not oil and gas.
The fact that he knows nothing about the subject matter from the business
that he was serving on, smells like corruption to me.
He is a lawyer and needs to know the law. What law is it that you are
referring to? His license to practice law is from the bar within the United
States, it does not extend to laws outside of these United States where it
would be equal to a prize at the bottom of a box of cracker jacks.
