From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 20:50
To: Anders Damsgaard <[email protected]>
Subject: FAKING THE SCIENCE FOR PUPILS - PART III

FAKING THE SCIENCE FOR PUPILS - PART III

I would like to mention from start that this newsletter is not discussing
about black holes and the 2020 noble prize in physics! I cannot spoil
the party and deny to these laureates a bit of fame they are craving
for long time, so this topic is postponed for the following newsletter.

Anyway, after solving the enigma of gravitational waves faked signal, now
it is high time to speak about 2019 nobel prize in physics. Consequently,
this newsletter has some sections dedicated to Mr. Peebles, although
I do not think he deserves so much! Maybe someone would like to help
me finding one of his original contribution to the modern science
because I found none!  I would like to advise the nobel committee
that prizing imbecility is fun, but they should pay also some speech
writers for helping the laureates to deliver some more consistent and
nicer presentations during the festivities.  In case of Mr. Peebles, it
was painful to see a nobel laureate who has achieved nothing in science
and the only relevant information from his presentation were some photo
with other nobel laureates or how he reinvented the wheel.  Coming back
to more serious things, the present newsletter is still insisting on
thermodynamic topics because this fake branch of science has brought
humanity on the dangerous slope of autodestruction and for any common
sense mind this has to be the starting point of any renaissance.

Section one presents an experiment advanced by me about a decade ago and
performed by a team from Museum Geneve. They used an old Watt engine
to be powered by compressed air instead of steam, and the engine is
producing mechanical work in absence of any source of heat. This is
going to remain one of the most representative experiment in the XXI
century science because it rules out the entire thermodynamic science
with zero costs for the experiment. My old article with some grammatical
correction is added to the newsletter too and one can make a comparison
with the original article kept on the website.  The second section is
about early atmospheric steam engines and there, it is demonstrated in
a simple but elegant manner how an entire class of steam engines, the
so called atmospheric steam engines, are ruling out again the entire
imbecility of second law of thermodynamics and of course the rest of
modern thermodynamics.

For close to a century, the so called atmospheric steam engines were the
only available type of steam engines used in producing mechanical work.
Although the idea of the first piston engine conceived by Denis Papin
before 1690 was sound, the performances of his first model were not
suitable for implementation in production. Yet, some improvements,
increased dramatically the performance of this engine.  The first
improvements regards the separation of boiler from engine and the
internal condensation of steam. These invention have been fraudulently
attributed to Thomas Newcomen. As described in a previous newsletter
(the process of information faking part I), Denis Papin was killed
and his documents stolen in order to have the plans for his latest
steam engine. It is going to be a further detective work to uncover
(if possible!) how Thomas Newcomen got the plans for this advanced
steam engine and the implication of Isaac Newton and his acolytes in
these events.  Other relevant invention was made much later by James
Watt, who separate the condensation of steam from the cylinder engine.
A detailed discussion about the atmospheric steam engines is provided
because it is high time to refurbish and put them at work again! There
are many technological processes in a lot of industries where steam is
usually a byproduct and  it is condensed to liquid with heat release
into atmosphere, without any gain...

The third section analysis how the steam from a common power plant (coal,
petrol, nuclear) can be used for generating another surplus of electric
energy by using the condensation of steam effect to produce mechanical
work. Here it is very important to be underlined that mechanical work is
generated by the fact that steam is condensed and the atmospheric pressure
is in fact generating the work in order to compensate the variation
of pressure in the cylinder.  The heat of condensation or the heat of
evaporation is going to be used as a tool in establishing the relationship
between heat and mechanical work.  For a pupil understanding things are
very simple; not so simple for some theoreticians in the field, though!
Assuming that 1 mole of water and one mole of acetone are either vaporized
or condensed, the heat consumed or recovered is much different, but the
variation of volume is quite the same.  The molar heat of vaporization for
water is 40.7 kJ/mol, but for acetone this is 31.0 kJ/mol. By evaporating
a mole of water and a mole of acetone the variation of volume is quite
the same. In gaseous state, a mole of any substance occupies a volume
of 22,4 litres. Of course this volume is considered for ideal conditions
and real conditions are a bit different from the ideal one.  By taking in
consideration the departure from ideal conditions for water and acetone,
and by taking in consideration the fact that in liquid state the volume
occupied by one mole of each substance is a bit different, there is
a flagrant discrepancy between the mechanical effect generated by one
mole of each substance and the heat of evaporation or condensation of
these substances.  In a laymen words, the consume for vaporization of
a water mole needs about one third more energy as for acetone, but the
mechanical work generated is quite the same.  The same thing happen
in condensation. By condensing a mole of water more heat is recovered
as for acetone, but the amount of mechanical work is quite the same.
This line of research like many others, has to wait until some imbeciles
having key position in science die and they are replaced by some new
intelligent ones. If the process is going to continue as in present days
(imbeciles replacing other imbeciles), then the humanity is condemned
to wait longer.....

The forth section shows how to put at work the nuclear garbage produced
by present day nuclear reactors. When fuel rods in a nuclear reactor
are no longer usable because the heat released is less than optimal
heat for the reactor needs, they are removed from the reactor core and
replaced with fresh fuel rods. The spent fuel rods are still highly
radioactive and continue to generate significant heat for decades. The
fuel assemblies, which consist of dozens to hundreds of fuel rods each,
are moved to pools of water to cool.  This newsletter advocates that
such garbage as far it is still producing thermal energy can be used for
producing electrical energy.  Well, instead of storing these spent fuel
material in water, a better solution is to store them in chloroform or
another convenient freon with a lower boiling point and a lower heat
of vaporization.  Instead of consuming energy to remove the heat from
the spent nuclear material, in this new design the heat is used to boil
the chloroform which further is used to produce mechanical work.

The fifth section demonstrates the imbecility of mass energy conversion
formula based on some nuclear reactions. In fact, for a laymen
understanding the nuclear physicists have to turn back to the drawing
board because entire particles (electrons) are missing in case of both
alpha and beta decay reactions. These theoreticians have to learn how
to write a chemical or nuclear reaction first and after that they can
discuss about thermal effects.  A new postulate is exemplified here too.
Postulate: Mass and energy are completely different physical units.
The sixth section presents the first nuclear incident in the Universe,
which took place immediately after the Big Bang, i.e. the deuterium
bottle neck. This is a parody to the imbecility of Big Bang theory and
in the same time a special dedication to Mr. Jim Peebles - the 2019
nobel laureate for his contribution to cosmology, mainly Big Bang theory
and other smaller imbecilities.  The seventh section is about nuclear
stability and an introduction to nuclear reactions. It is a parody to the
boys farm for whom a special units was introduced in physics, i.e. the
barn. The section demonstrates for a boy farm understanding that things
are out of control and another path has to be find for the future.

The eighth section describes a new effect and only its title is going
to scare the GR fanatics, because it describes static and dynamic
time delay in GR.  A new postulate is presented and exemplified here:
Postulate: Any change in space metric affects the measured distances
and the temporal order of the events in that region of space.  The ninth
section dedicated to Mr. Peebles, analyses his remarkable presentation
at the nobel prize gala.

The last section is a copy carbon from the previous newsletter (Old game,
same scene, new actors and figureheads ….), because it is important
for people to get in touch with the expected unexpected...

The link to this newsletter:
https://www.pleistoros.com/en/newsletters

Sincerely,

Sorin Cezar Coșofreț