Subj : RE: Off-duty cop shoots 3
To : DIGITAL MAN
From : Dumas Walker
Date : Wed Jun 19 2019 07:50 pm
>And the first thing you do when you wake up from being "knocked out" is to star
>shooting people?
If he really was knocked down and out, I wonder if he was concussed.
> The story is just so suspicious and it really bothers me how t
>he facts are portrayed differently when the shooter is a cop. The killed-man's
>arents were "injured" (not "shot", though they were shot, and are in critical c
>ndition) and "an argument insued which resulted in a shot being fired" instead
>f "6 to 8 shots being fired" (according to many witnesses present). It's alread
>spun in defense of the cop.
That does sound fishy. Some of it could be explained away by an inaccurate
first report, but not all of it.
On an unrelated note, I am reading this message in a QWK mail reader.
While other people's messages seem to be line wrapping fine, yours are
breaking mid-word. In the first & second line of the second quote above, the
"t" and the "he" are quoted back as received here. Same with "p" "arents",
"co" "ndition", etc.
