Subj : Re: Off-duty cop shoots 3 unarmed shoppers at my neighborhood Costco
To   : Nightfox
From : Vk3jed
Date : Thu Jun 20 2019 11:07 am

-=> On 06-19-19 17:12, Nightfox wrote to Vk3jed <=-

Ni> He shouldn't have been driving alone without a license, either.  I'm

If he didn't have one at all, that's correct, another big fine here.  And once
you've obtained your license, you have to carry it with you when you're
riving.

Ni> sure there was a fine for that, and I'm not sure how insurance here
Ni> works in that situation either.  Where I am, if you don't have a

Well, I suspect insurance wouldn't cover him, Insurance companies are pretty
picky about who's driving.  Here, we also have "no fault compulsory third
party", which is paid as part of your car registration, but covers ALL road
users for road related injury, regardless of who's at fault.  The CTP does not
cover property damage, you have to insure for that yourself privately.

Ni> license but have a learner's permit, there must be a licensed driver at
Ni> least a certain age (18, maybe?) in the car with the driver.  I don't
Ni> know if he had his learner's permit..

Same here too.

The confusing term was "didn't have his license", which is actually ambiguous,
"unlicensed" would have been 100% clear, because not being in possession of
one's license while on the road is also an offence here (i.e. leaving it at
home).


... Activity is the politician's substitute for achievement.
--- MultiMail/Win v0.51